|
|
Fancy that, better robots winning matches... - DampRobot [more] |
 |
|
|
|
|
Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
By: Chuck Glick
New: 08-01-2008 17:20
Updated: 08-01-2008 19:48
Views: 1776 times
Dawgma's '08 drivetrain as of today. 6wd with the Andymark Toughbox. We chose to use the Toughbox because we knew that we liked the AM Single Speed's we used last year, the toughbox is an improved version of it, and most importantly, it's lighter than the AM Single Speed. We plan to have the base moving by Friday.
Questions, comments or criticisms are encouraged!
Discussion
08-01-2008 20:37
Josh Goodman
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
WOOT!! 80-20!!!
08-01-2008 21:14
VanMan
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
I dislike the kitbox, I prefer 80-20 also. Looks great!
08-01-2008 21:50
=Martin=Taylor=
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
8020 is da bomb!
But 4" of ground clearance!!!??? At least mount your pillow blocks on the upper side! There aren't any obstacles to climb this year!
08-01-2008 23:35
Chuck Glick
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hachiban VIII
8020 is da bomb!
But 4" of ground clearance!!!??? At least mount your pillow blocks on the upper side! There aren't any obstacles to climb this year!
|
Less 80/20 to be used for the upper part with clearance...and no obstacles = does it really matter? (and don't you lower CG me....lol)
Trust me, we have our reasons for the 3.75" clearance
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanMan
I dislike the kitbox, I prefer 80-20 also. Looks great!
|
Why wouldn't you like the kit gearbox?!?
We beat the snot out of our AM single speeds last year, and this years Toughbox is an IMPROVED version of the AM Single. From experiences we have had with AM products, the quality is ALWAYS top notch and can take just about ANYTHING you throw it's way.
08-01-2008 23:39
Chuck Glick
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
<edit> meant to multi quote.
09-01-2008 00:48
laultima
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
I remember at Atlanta someone looking at our bot and saying "Hmm... you used chassis metal for the manipulator and 80-20 for the chassis. I would have gone the other way."
80-20 is our favorite base material.
10-01-2008 19:30
EricLeifermann
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
How did you attach the toughbox to your frame?
13-01-2008 11:15
Rich Kressly
Re: pic: Dawgma 1712 as of January 8th at 5:10pm
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricLeifermann
How did you attach the toughbox to your frame?
|
We drilled right through the bottom of the housing and bolted it to the frame. One of our seniors last year used this method in the spring with the AM single speed and even with the shaft unsupported on the outside it ran fine without loosening. Our latest iteration is now lower to the ground with the drive bearings flipped over, which you can see here:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/img...a3f60049_l.jpg. There are two bolts through the bottom of the housing and we are also supporting the drive shaft on the outside with a bearing. We gave the drivebase a good workout on carpet on Sat 1/12 and even fully loaded to 145 lbs (simulating final weight with battery and bumpers) everything stayed tight and aligned.
previous
next
Tags
loading ...
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24.