|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
A view head on of our robot as designed.
No controls are shown yet...
28-01-2008 17:53
Bob SteeleThis is our second year and our second attempt at a robot.
This one is designed in Inventor. Just thought we would see if anyone wants to speculate on it from this view.
Good luck everyone!!
We will see you in Atlanta...
Bonus points to those that can figure out the name of the robot..
Uber Stinktier....
R
28-01-2008 17:55
EricH
|
This is our second year and our second attempt at a robot.
This one is designed in Inventor. Just thought we would see if anyone wants to speculate on it from this view. Good luck everyone!! We will see you in Atlanta... Bonus points to those that can figure out the name of the robot.. Uber Stinktier.... R |
28-01-2008 17:58
Bob Steele|
Hurdler with omni drive.
Oh, and the name is German for "Skunk". I guess that's appropriate for a team known as "Skunkworks"... |
28-01-2008 18:04
Madison
Do y'all have a way of rolling tubing to make the claw? We're trying to figure out a way of doing something similar ourselves.
The machine looks good. There're some interesting things happening there with the 18" stroke, 1.5" bore piston and the peculiarly placed van door motor.
28-01-2008 18:04
thefro526
Is that an arm or an elevator all i can make out in that pic is a massive claw and a van door motor
28-01-2008 18:21
Bob Steele|
Do y'all have a way of rolling tubing to make the claw? We're trying to figure out a way of doing something similar ourselves.
The machine looks good. There're some interesting things happening there with the 18" stroke, 1.5" bore piston and the peculiarly placed van door motor. |
29-01-2008 00:30
Elgin Clock
A friend of mine commented on how it looks like "a pope hat on wheels", and that's when it hit me..
Your team is playing chess this year!!!
Bishop ftw! 
Btw, going with the tubing conversation, chromoly tubing is good if you have access to a shop that makes that kind of stuff.
(Any shops that design or fabricate chassis for race cars or bicycle frames near you by any chance?)
29-01-2008 01:21
jgannon
29-01-2008 03:19
Guy DavidsonLooks like a very cool machine, from what I can see from the picture (and that isn't much). Can't wait to see it at Portland!
29-01-2008 11:41
MrForbes
|
Do y'all have a way of rolling tubing to make the claw? We're trying to figure out a way of doing something similar ourselves.
|
29-01-2008 16:40
Bob SteeleThanks for all of the comments.
We have had success using a pipe bending machine originally designed to bend muffler pipes... a mentor just happens to have one...
It worked pretty well on 3/4 square soft aluminum tubing (wall thickness 1/8")
A pope robot eh?
interesting... perhaps the side view will explain...
It is actually a 15 " throw 1.5" diameter Bimba cylinder...
It is used for tipping back the lift to obtain a better center of gravity during flight.
We will see everyone in Portland, Seattle (Tacoma) , and at CMP.
I hope this thing works....
R
29-01-2008 16:47
jgannon
29-01-2008 16:57
rachalYou should name it after a rocket...
Just wondering, why did you angle the omnis instead of using mecanums?
29-01-2008 17:32
Bob Steele|
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there aren't any legal 1.5" bore cylinders with a stroke greater than 11". The only legal cylinders are the ones available from this page:
http://www.bimba.com/FirstFree.aspx |
29-01-2008 17:41
EricH
|
Thanks for the heads up... it looks like our engineering team goofed.
Glad you caught it... .. We will figure out something else then... the only long cylinder is the 2" 24" throw big boy... I don't think we can afford the weight of that beast... and we certainly don't need the power... |
29-01-2008 17:55
JHSmentor|
I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but there aren't any legal 1.5" bore cylinders with a stroke greater than 11". The only legal cylinders are the ones available from this page:
http://www.bimba.com/FirstFree.aspx |
29-01-2008 18:11
EricH
|
My understanding was that these are the only sizes that you can order this year. But, any Parker or Bimba cylinder is actually legal regardless of size. Am I wrong on this one? If so, then we need to re-evaluate our design as well.
|
29-01-2008 20:57
Bob SteeleWe have already changed our design to use an 11" cylinder and it works fine.
It was a small change now but would have been tougher later.
Thank you guys for giving us a heads up...
Easy redesign now because we are still to cut these parts...
THE SKUNKS THANK YOU!~!!!!!
The Chief Delphi family is nice to be in...
For anyone's information ... the ONLY cylinders you may use are cylinders identical to those in the Pneumatic manual...
30-01-2008 14:15
Madison
|
We do have a way to roll tubing but we won't be using rolled tubing.
We made up layups to make the curved components from either carbon fiber or fiberglass... looking at the merits and weights of each right now. Madison, we can roll tubing but it takes soft aluminum... it would probably have to be heat treated...we have a mock up in 3/4 X 1/8 wall that we are testing... let me know if we can help... |
We've got 1x1x1/16" on hand as well as some 3/4" round tubing. The square tubing is 6061; I'm not sure what allow the round tubing is. We bought it back in 2006 and found then that we couldn't accurately bend it in a way that suited our needs.
30-01-2008 15:32
=Martin=Taylor=|
Ah, I see. Our gripper base is designed to accept anything as large as 1x1" square tubing -- and to allow replacing it quickly when it gets mangled to Hell.
We've got 1x1x1/16" on hand as well as some 3/4" round tubing. The square tubing is 6061; I'm not sure what allow the round tubing is. We bought it back in 2006 and found then that we couldn't accurately bend it in a way that suited our needs.I'll PM you a screenshot of our claw so you can get a better idea of what we're going for. |
) with a lead time of 20 days!
30-01-2008 18:22
JHSmentor|
Re-read the pneumatics rules, and read the Q&A. They are only legal if they are an exact match to a cylinder on the current order form (or as close as possible--there is still an issue needing clarifying about part numbers having to be the same).
|