|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Over the past 6 years, our team has done well using a welded square tubing frame. In addition, we really haven't built a successful (or what I consider successful) non-tank-tread driven robot since '03. However, I wanted to get our students learning about alternative drivetrains & frame construction methods and push them to expand their mindset beyond welded tubing frames and tank treads. With this photo submission, I'm hoping to get some feedback/suggestions from those teams that are well-versed in successful riveted frame construction. If anyone else has questions/comments, I'd be happy to answer them as well.
This 6-wheeled drivetrain designed this summer uses 1" x 3" x 1/8" aluminum U-channel riveted together at the four primary assembly points. A piece of 7/8" x 7/8" x 1/8" 90-degree angle aluminum is located in both interior corners where the frame rail butts against the end rail. Rivets go through all three pieces (frame rail & both 90-degree angles), with the 90-degree angle pieces providing mounting tabs to rivet to the end rail. T-shaped plates are riveted to both the top and bottom for additional joint strength and stability.
Total weight including motors, wheels, chains, and fasteners (minus battery and bumpers) is just under 43 lbs.
Questions:
- I was planning on using general purpose, 5/32" stainless steel blind rivets. Are there alternative suggestions? 3/16"?
- Will rivets work for this high-impact application, or would it be better to accept the small amount of additional weight and use bolts/nuts?
- If rivets will work, are there enough rivets to do the job?
11-08-2008 17:54
artdutra04
As long as you use enough of them, rivets work just fine for holding frames together, especially since you also have the top and bottom gusset plates. For some of the more high strength areas, you may want to stick with 3/16" steel rivets (such as where the front/rear frame members intersect with the longitudinal drive train members), but for things like the top and bottom gusset plates, 1/8" steel rivets work just fine.
Unless you need something to be removable, use rivets if at all possible. It makes it so much easier when you don't have to figure out how to get a wrench into the chassis to tighten nuts. ;-)
Otherwise, this definitely looks like a good chassis and drive train design so far.
11-08-2008 18:31
bigbeezyNow I do have one question.
Is that U-channel or Rectangle Tubing where the wheels are mounted? Now someone with more experience with cantilevered wheels correct me, but don't you need a place for 2 bearings to support the axle? If it is indeed tubing then never mind.
11-08-2008 18:57
Billfred
1618 did rivets in the frame this year, 1/4" aluminum ones to match the kitbot. We ran them rivet-for-bolt, 72 in all, and had zero problems in testing and spirited running at Chesapeake. We had bumpers on three sides (the rear bumper was dropped after we realized how much of a pain in the butt it was to attach when we were already compliant), which seems to help by all indications.
Last year, we used 3/16" rivets to hold together the two members of our arm's tower. We used two on each side--you can see them on one side here, just beside the radio antenna. Even with questionable mounting of our tower, particularly in the rear, the rivets held together fine through all of Palmetto and our off-season demonstrations. The rivets sheared on one side following a particularly nasty tip at Brunswick Eruption and would've been easily fixed had I not left the team's rivet tool 700 miles away in South Carolina. (oops.) At that point, we just enlarged one hole to 1/4", stuck in a kitbot nut/bolt, and ran off to the next match.
Just two points of data--your mileage may vary, but I will note that rivets are the win. 
11-08-2008 19:52
R.C.
Team Pink this year riveted their whole frame together, we are planning to rivet the frame and then weld. Ask why?
This frame here:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/img...4fa048a3_l.jpg
If you rivet the whole frame together with 90 degree angled aluminum. We took about three weeks to weld this whole thing. If you rivet it first, the welding is a lot easier for our welders. Meaning that you can have a frame welded in about 4 days.
11-08-2008 21:41
Jonathan Norris
|
Now I do have one question.
Is that U-channel or Rectangle Tubing where the wheels are mounted? Now someone with more experience with cantilevered wheels correct me, but don't you need a place for 2 bearings to support the axle? If it is indeed tubing then never mind. |
12-08-2008 00:17
MrForbes
1726 did a riveted chassis this year, made from 1 x 4 x 1/4" pultruded fiberglass channel, and .060" sheet 3003 aluminum for the full belly pan and top gussets. We used 3/16" rivets from the hardware store. It worked just fine. Also we used cantilevered axles, mounted directly to the fiberglass, and had no problem with them. There was quite a bit of design work in this chassis, so fabrication and assembly was straightforward.
The cantilevered axles worked because they were mounted with flange nuts with a 1" diameter bearing surface, and the fiberglass is thick enough that it would not flex or be damaged by the load. There were no lightening holes in any of it. Fiberglass is about half the density of aluminum, so the weight of 1/4" thick fiberglass is about the same as 1/8" thick aluminum of the same size.
I think there are some pictures on the NERDS photo gallery...
12-08-2008 01:54
M. Mellott|
Now I do have one question.
Is that U-channel or Rectangle Tubing where the wheels are mounted? Now someone with more experience with cantilevered wheels correct me, but don't you need a place for 2 bearings to support the axle? If it is indeed tubing then never mind. |
|
From this picture it looks to me like they are cantilevered, which worries me. Also it looks like the wheels are height adjustable in some way, I would love to have a closer look at how you are approaching it. Hopefully there is more support on those cantilevered then it looks...
|
12-08-2008 02:03
M. Mellott|
1726 did a riveted chassis this year, made from 1 x 4 x 1/4" pultruded fiberglass channel, and .060" sheet 3003 aluminum for the full belly pan and top gussets. We used 3/16" rivets from the hardware store. It worked just fine. Also we used cantilevered axles, mounted directly to the fiberglass, and had no problem with them. There was quite a bit of design work in this chassis, so fabrication and assembly was straightforward.
I think there are some pictures on the NERDS photo gallery... |
12-08-2008 03:24
s_forbes|
I took a look at the pictures and noticed you notched the U-channel to insert the end into the end rail similar to this design. However, there appeared to be nothing joining the four fiberglass frame members together except for the bellypan and the four sheetmetal gusset plates on top of the four corners, with nothing actually inside the corners. Is that correct?
|
12-08-2008 08:50
MrForbes
In the design M. Mellott posted, it appears that the attachment at the web of the channel is probably not necessary, since most of the web between the wheel and the end of the frame has been cut away. Also the bending load is highest at the flange of the channel.
I'd suggest not cutting out the side frame members for lightening...leave them strong, and you should be able to eliminate the corner pieces that connect the webs of the channels, while enlarging the top and bottom gussets so that they make good-sized triangles.
12-08-2008 15:32
Madison
Our frames are typically assembled with a sort-of combination of press-fit construction held with rivets. In 2008, we inserted 1.5" square tube into channel with a 1.5" inside width; a tight fit. We then fixed it in place with four 1/4" rivets -- two on top and two below.
It holds very well.
Are you concerned about the torsional stiffness of the channel that contains the axle mounts? Rectangular tubing in the same application would be quite a bit stiffer.
12-08-2008 16:17
MrForbes
The open channel seems to me to be easier to work with than tubing....and any twisting of the main side members could also be reduced by adding a lightweight channel crossmember across the middle of the chassis. This could be integrated into the structure that holds the electronics, or placed right next to the transmissions.
12-08-2008 16:29
M. Mellott|
Are you concerned about the torsional stiffness of the channel that contains the axle mounts? Rectangular tubing in the same application would be quite a bit stiffer.
|
12-08-2008 16:52
IKE|
You make a good point. I'm always concerned about the overall strength of the frame. I believe that the base frame is the foundation of the robot, and a team should never have to worry about it as far as maintenance--too many other things need attention and, barring a catastrophy, should be rock solid. We've always had solid frames, but often "solid" translated to "heavy".
I suppose we were trying to be a little different (as far as our past designs go), not only with the use of U-channel, but also the added weight savers. This is why we were hoping to develope the design over the summer, then construct and test/abuse during the fall once school starts up. |
12-08-2008 17:25
MrForbes
Using fiberglass for the main frame members is really nice....no dents....
(although some of the team members are talking about using wood next year!)
12-08-2008 17:48
M. MellottEveryone,
Thank you very much for the comments/questions--keep 'm coming!!
12-08-2008 18:57
Mike Nawrot|
Using fiberglass for the main frame members is really nice....no dents....
|
12-08-2008 23:58
s_forbesI might also want to mention that we also used rivets on our mechanisms this year, and we did have several shake loose. These were mostly in the high stress points in our launching mechanism and lifting mechanism (which took a severe beating). They were all easy to replace, but it took us a couple of attempts to realize that if the plates aren't clamped together very well when you rivet them, they will shake loose again in no time.
All the rivets in the frame stayed tight all season though!
(a mild escapade off topic)
|
The one issue we ran into with it (apart from the constant irritation of the fiberglass dust), was the fibrous nature of the material. Since fiberglass is a series of glass fibers held together by an epoxy, drilling holes in the material leaves exposed fiber ends, allowing the material to be pulled apart.
|
13-08-2008 01:40
Mike Nawrot|
This is interesting, where did you get your fiberglass from? The stuff we use drills and cuts very cleanly, and I've never experienced any irritation from it (though I think some team members found it to be itchy). We get ours from creative pultrusions, http://www.creativepultrusions.com/ )
|
) is to remember that fiberglass is just different from aluminum, and to design accordingly.
13-08-2008 09:00
MrForbes
I can easily imagine having problems with attaching hardware to fiberglass tube...we have only used channel, angle, and I beam shapes, which are much easier to deal with.
You do have to be careful with design, taking into account the properties of the material you are using.
For round tubing, clamping might be a safer way of attaching it.
13-08-2008 12:27
Mike Nawrot|
For round tubing, clamping might be a safer way of attaching it.
|
13-08-2008 14:19
Tom Line|
We have been doing a folded sheet metal riveted frame for 3 years now. While in general I really like it, this years game was particularly rough on it. The high-speed nature of overdrive combined with the less than compliant barrier wall made for some interesting bends in the frame this year. Our material is also a lot thinner as we use mostly 0.060 and 0.050 AL to make our frame.
If you do riveted joints, make sure that you check them periodically after major impacts and/or the end of the day. After a lot of wear and tear, then tend to loosen. Not that I would stop using them, but they do become a maintenance item. Also don't use the largest rivet that will package because having an up size option at competition is handy should they become loose. |