|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is the Mecanum hub we will be using in 2009 assuming we can get someone with a 5-axis CNC to machine it. Pictures with rollers coming soon.
04-11-2008 09:38
JesseKHope you're ready to re-CAD it from scratch on kickoff day
I'm having trouble visualizing the full wheel, any chance a photo of that could be posted? It seems like the rollers would interfere with the roller-mount supports (the angled struts coming off of the roller mount flanges).
04-11-2008 09:49
NickE|
Originally Posted by R27
Prior to the Kick-off: Before the formal start of the Robot Build Season, teams are encouraged to think as much as they please about their ROBOTS. They may develop prototypes, create proof-of-concept models, and conduct design exercises. Teams may gather all the raw stock materials and COTS COMPONENTS they want. But absolutely no fabrication or assembly of any elements intended for the final ROBOT is permitted prior to the Kick-off presentation
|
04-11-2008 09:57
JesseKThe paragraph above <R27> states the spirit of the rule. Though it's not 'technically' a rule, it's still in the rulebook and still explicitly governs as such: (emphasis is mine)
| Teams can not be prevented from thinking about their hardware and software designs, and it is not our intention to do so. However, the timeline permitted for the development of the actual competition version of the ROBOT is severely, and intentionally, restricted. Pondering software issues to be resolved, researching general case solutions, discussing solutions with teammates, collecting raw materials, sketching mechanisms, preparing tools, and outlining high-level descriptions of software algorithms are all reasonable activities outside of the scheduled build periods. But completing detailed dimensioned drawings of parts, and any actual fabrication of any hardware items intended to go on the actual competition ROBOT is prohibited outside of the approved fabrication periods. |
04-11-2008 10:10
KINGOFCLUBS454
Rules aside, that is a beautiful looking hub, I can't wait to see it with rollers. I noticed you had some extra support between the spokes, what's your reasoning behind that?
04-11-2008 10:57
Lowfategg
Those are very cool looking. Hope you can find someone to machine them.
Is not andymark going to release an updated version of the mecanum wheels this year? I know a lot of teams did not like the thin sheet the old ones are made of.
04-11-2008 11:11
EricH
Rules aside (as you can argue either way), there is one other issue. Mecanum is cool, but don't make design decisions before Kickoff. You don't know what the game is, or if mecanums are going to be a good option. (Or even if you can get that 5-axis CNC...) If you lock in now, you may easily be at a competitive disadvantage come competition.
04-11-2008 13:13
Dan Richardson
Pretty! Do you have any back up solutions if you don't gain access to a 5 axis cnc?
And as far as I understand the intent of the rule and clarifications last season, if you were to make the drawings publicly available on Delphi white papers or any other viable source, then you would be able to use the same drawings. ( I.e. nothing but dewalts )
04-11-2008 16:35
AustinSchuhAny reason you are using a key instead of hex?
04-11-2008 17:01
dlavery
Pretty! Do you have any back up solutions if you don't gain access to a 5 axis cnc? |
04-11-2008 17:41
EricH
|
Of course, that may be a moot point if the new "no metal parts allowed" rule stays in play...
-dave . |
04-11-2008 18:50
IKE|
Of course, that may be a moot point if the new "no metal parts allowed" rule stays in play...
-dave . |
04-11-2008 19:08
willson.thomasI have just uploaded the hub with the rollers finished. If we do not get a 5-axis we will just use our previous mecanum design. We have had mecanums for the past three years. This is just a significantly lighter way of creating them. Will post pics of old ones soon.
We are in no way locking ourselves into these hubs. We will not request them to be manufactured until after we know the challenge and have evaluated the advantages and disadvantages. For overdrive we seriously considered not using them, but decided the maneuverability we would gain we more than make up for the speed loss when trying to pick up the ball.
04-11-2008 19:14
Andrew Schreiber|
Okay Dave,
I think I have the structures, motors and the power source worked out. The controls are going to be very interesting though. May have to check out a "Idiot's Guide to Programming with Rope" from the Library in Alexandria. |
04-11-2008 19:18
RyanCahoonNah... we'll just program dna and rat brains to control the robots this year.
Completely organic game: First alliance to eat all the food items on the field wins.
Of course some teams will opt for herbivores, some carnivores. Rule: no eating the other robots.
Better start working on getting those biomedical sponsors...
04-11-2008 19:39
Qbranch
Oooh... pretty!
I feel like this thing should be in some kind of fancy impeller assembly... wait a minute.
I know! You're fooling us! It's actually a propeller, and you're on the inside of the conspiracy trying to convince us all there won't be a water game this year! Ahah! Caught mechanum-wheel-hub in hand!
-q 
05-11-2008 00:45
willson.thomasTo answer more questions...
We are using a key rather than hex because that is what the Banebots planetary transmissions use, which are what we have used in the past.
We need a 5-axis because it has to be able to drill the hole from one side of the hub, then flip around, and drill the hole exactly on the other side. I do not believe that it could be done manually, regardless of the center design. I do not see how the center would be milled out or how we would get those holes drilled at an angle like that.
05-11-2008 02:58
dtengineering
I think it may be possible for you to create a functionally, if not aesthetically, identical hub without using a 5 axis mill. In fact, it may be possible to do without using anything more than a good lathe, turret head mill, and indexing head.
I don't say this to discourage you from trying to get time on a 5 axis machine... go for it! It may be that given current economic conditions that some machine time is an easier donation for a shop to make than financial support. Rather I suggest this because one of the things I really like about FRC is that it encourages designers to think like builders... in other words, it doesn't matter how good it looks in CAD if you can't build it (quickly and efficiently) in real life!
Just as you've found it to be an interesting and useful exercise to design this hub, working in various machining constraints ("How can we make this without a 5 axis machine?") can make it an even more beneficial exercise. Talk to some machinists about what they can do with non-CNC equipment and you may be amazed.
Ooooorrrr.... why not go all the way down the rapid prototyping track and use a 3D printer and lost wax casting to go almost directly from CAD to metal?
Oh, right... no metal allowed this year.
Jason
05-11-2008 10:45
dlavery
Wilson-
Other than the obvious problems with the "no metal" rule
I do have one serious question. How will the roller axles be attached to the hub, and have you looked at the stresses across that joint? From your hub design, it appears that the rollers will be split in the middle, with half-rollers cantilevered out on either side of the tang through which the axle passes. As the wheel rotates, (assuming a proper profile on the rollers - which many of the mechanum wheels used by FRC teams do not have) the contact patch between the wheel and the ground should start at the end of the roller and move across the entire length and off the other end. When each roller first makes contact with the ground and the contact patch is at the end of the roller, the torque applied to the axle/hub joint can be significant (for a typical ~150 pound FRC robot, 600-1000 in-oz would not be unusual). That obviously is a dynamic load as the contact patch moves from one end of the roller to the other. So expect those values to at least double as shock loads if the roller is not shaped properly and you get intermittent contact between the roller and the ground as the wheel rotates.
Many designs avoid the center joint/cantilevered roller approach and go with an axle that is supported on both ends. This can add in a different set of issues (e.g. the axle supports must be designed to avoid striking the ground when the wheel rotates), but it does avoid one of the most common failure modes. The alternative is to really beef up the axle/hub joint to make sure it can handle the loads you are going to see.
I am not familiar with the mechanum wheel design you have used previously, so you may have already addressed this. In which case - "never mind." It is just not obvious from this image how the design handles this.
-dave
05-11-2008 11:24
MrForbes
|
Talk to some machinists about what they can do with non-CNC equipment and you may be amazed.
|
05-11-2008 12:52
Brandon Holley
|
Wilson-
Other than the obvious problems with the "no metal" rule I do have one serious question. How will the roller axles be attached to the hub, and have you looked at the stresses across that joint? |
06-11-2008 12:58
Triple Bvery nice , but i will agree that a hex drive is a better choice than the key way.
mike d
06-11-2008 15:58
techtiger1Very nice design work. Gotta to agree with Studman Dan, Mike and DL in this thread though all very good points made. Also how many materials do you have available to use for roller testing. Durometer and polyurethane seems to work the best ask 357. I do love the web in between the petals of the wheel very good addition to your generic design. Good luck and I hope you get them made the way you want them to come out. Ohh and if you do make them take some pics please becuase these are sure to come out purty.
06-11-2008 17:02
willson.thomas
Above is the complete mecanum assembly. We first used mecanums in 2006 and discovered that the axle needed to be supported. Our current drive base design includes this. I will put this mecanum hub and put it on our drive base along with the old hub and upload it when I get a chance. The reason we won't build this without a 5-axis is that the time required would not really be justifiable during the six week build season when we can get the old one made really easily.