|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
2009 control system inventory
Here are the contents of our early (November) "present" from FIRST.
And to think I was complaining about Christmas decorations being up before Thanksgiving.
I like presents 
19-11-2008 12:47
Pat FairbankSo they are, in fact, having us use those huge DB-37 cables to connect the DSCs to the cRIO. 
Hopefully we will be allowed to replace them with ribbon cables.
19-11-2008 13:06
rees2001
I like seeing the 2 digital sidecars. Even though most teams won't need more than 1.
19-11-2008 13:17
GdeaverIn the past I've been a little critical of First for not providing value for the fees. I with draw my judgement. Dam those Jags are big!
19-11-2008 13:31
Mark McLeod
There is another photo pending that shows the Victor and Jaguar side-by-side. Those Jags are massive!
|
In the past I've been a little critical of First for not providing value for the fees. I with draw my judgement. Dam those Jags are big!
|
19-11-2008 13:53
EricVanWyk|
It seems to just be a fine blade. If we use a close match are there potential problems we should be wary of?
I just imagine having only one Waco tool means it will immediately be misplaced. ![]() |
19-11-2008 14:07
colin340
that is no WOGO tool guys sorry but if you look the WOGO web site it says the WOGO tool has a "Partially insulated shaft makes this tool an optimal choice for connecting terminal blocks"
link-http://www.wago.us/products/2453.htm
looks nice but man i hope they give us 5 more lbs
and the jags are shiny and nice but they big and i still have questions on there air flow
19-11-2008 14:08
Travis Hoffman
|
There is another photo pending that shows the Victor and Jaguar side-by-side. Those Jags are massive!
It seems to just be a fine blade. If we use a close match are there potential problems we should be wary of? I just imagine having only one Waco tool means it will immediately be misplaced. ![]() |
19-11-2008 14:08
Rickertsen2
That is a large number of of really big components to fit in a small space.
19-11-2008 14:11
Elgin Clock
Are the joysticks comfortable (in ergonomic terms) & interchangable, or do we have two right-handed sticks again?
I'm not familiar with that brand.
19-11-2008 14:17
Lowfategg
|
Are the joysticks comfortable (in ergonomic terms) & interchangable, or do we have two right-handed sticks again?
I'm not familiar with that brand. |

19-11-2008 14:38
Taylor|
That is a large number of of really big components to fit in a small space.
|
19-11-2008 14:42
Lowfategg
|
Nobody said they had to fit in a small space. Yet. We'll see in January.
|
19-11-2008 14:45
Joe Ross
|
That is a large number of of really big components to fit in a small space.
|
19-11-2008 15:11
Kingofl337I wonder what the cost will be for just a 2nd CRio and Power Distro Board. Seeing many teams will have a spare Digital Side car and Analog Bumper.
19-11-2008 15:11
Alan Anderson
|
Are the joysticks comfortable (in ergonomic terms) & interchangable, or do we have two right-handed sticks again?
I'm not familiar with that brand. |
19-11-2008 15:31
vivek16I have a WAGO tool. It's a screwdriver but sharp enough to cut yourself with. 
-Vivek
EDIT: accidentaly of course 
19-11-2008 15:47
Jeff Pahl
|
That is a large number of of really big components to fit in a small space.
|
Just like we face every day in industry. It's all just part of the fun.
19-11-2008 15:58
Taylor|
I wonder what the cost will be for just a 2nd CRio and Power Distro Board. Seeing many teams will have a spare Digital Side car and Analog Bumper.
|
19-11-2008 16:13
Tom Bottiglieri|
Don't hold your breath on that one. There are some very compelling reasons to keep the entire robot weight below 150 lbs.
120 + 15 [bumpers] + 13 [battery] = 148 |
19-11-2008 16:16
Jeff Pahl
19-11-2008 16:30
Alan Anderson
|
I believe the NI fellows that made the presentation at the IndianaFIRST forum said one extra package will be available to each FIRST teams for $650 (any more and you pay full price).
|
19-11-2008 16:35
IndySam
|
I believe the NI fellows that made the presentation at the IndianaFIRST forum said one extra package will be available to each FIRST teams for $650 (any more and you pay full price).
|
19-11-2008 17:02
waialua359
19-11-2008 17:14
Mark McLeod
|
NICE! Lucky you, ground shipping is fast shipping where you're located.
|

19-11-2008 17:15
Stu Bloom
|
I though they said $1000 for an the extra cRIO and each team could purchase one at that price.
I believe Andy was estimating $200-$300 for the PD, sidecar and breakouts. |
19-11-2008 18:51
Ed Sparks
Looks like I'll have plenty of parts to model this year for the FirstCadLibrary.
19-11-2008 19:25
ATannahill
E-mail to the shipping contact registered in TIMS.
19-11-2008 19:25
Vikesrock
19-11-2008 19:35
wilsonmw04
19-11-2008 19:56
yarb65Weight limit cannot be increased because of OSHA regs.That would be over the limit that 2 students are allowed to lift by reg.
19-11-2008 21:56
roboticWanderor|
That is a large number of of really big components to fit in a small space.
|
19-11-2008 22:26
Jon236|
Weight limit cannot be increased because of OSHA regs.That would be over the limit that 2 students are allowed to lift by reg.
|
19-11-2008 22:48
Coach NormWe got our confirmation email today from UPS that a package shipped from NH to Austin. We will get it on Monday. To bad, NI could not have delivered it to us since we are right down the road. We are excited to get it.
20-11-2008 00:56
comphappy|
To be clear, there is no OSHA lifting regulations. There is a NIOSH lifting equation, which has not been verified experimentally. The 75 pounds x 2 may come from UPS weight limits. On average, the NIOSH equation actually suggests a 50 pound limit per person.
So, while there is no regulatory requirement that prevents FIRST from adding 5 pounds to the robot's weight limit, good safety practices should. Besides, we always need more engineering challenges! |
20-11-2008 02:23
R.C.
|
I did it! in SolidWorks! on this chassis! The power distribution block, and the sidecar make your layout a lot simpler, routing all of the same types of wires to one place on the robot, so you can efficiently place things like the hulking jaguars without much heartache. there are also no need for arrays of spikes, or multiple breaker panels for your larger motors.
|
21-11-2008 00:37
cbale2000I'm so glad they're giving us good joysticks this year, I've got an Attack 3 that I've had for several years now and it works very well for almost anything. I actually considered using mine on the robot this year if we didn't get good ones in the kit, I guess this solves that problem. 
21-11-2008 00:40
Lowfategg
|
I'm so glad they're giving us good joysticks this year, I've got an Attack 3 that I've had for several years now and it works very well for almost anything. I actually considered using mine on the robot this year if we didn't get good ones in the kit, I guess this solves that problem.
![]() |
21-11-2008 00:53
Brandon Holley
|
I agree even though everyone says I am nuts for not liking the flight sticks!
|
21-11-2008 01:03
EricH
|
any "old timer" in FIRST is going to miss those flight sticks, nothing too flashy, just a solid piece of equipment
|
21-11-2008 01:30
Nuttyman54
|
Every REALLY old "old-timer" is going to miss the sticks before those! Yep, the single-button, single-trigger, ambidextrous ones that came pre-2004 were missed (and used at every opportunity possible by those who had them and didn't like the ones provided).
|
21-11-2008 01:38
Jeff Pahl
|
I don't actually know the name of the tan ones we've been getting recently, but very few people that have used the old standbys like them better.
|
21-11-2008 01:41
EricH
|
The pre-2004 black joysticks you refer too are these Flightsticks we speak of. I don't actually know the name of the tan ones we've been getting recently, but very few people that have used the old standbys like them better.
|
21-11-2008 06:47
Billfred
So given the cult following the Flightsticks have, has anyone tested the USB-based Flightstick Pro that CH Products still produces with the new driver's station? It seems that they've dropped the standard USB Flightstick, but it seemed like there were a lot more of them in odd shops and eBay than there were gameport ones back in 2004 and 2005 when everyone was scrambling to find the latter.
21-11-2008 09:50
Brandon Holley
|
Every REALLY old "old-timer" is going to miss the sticks before those! Yep, the single-button, single-trigger, ambidextrous ones that came pre-2004 were missed (and used at every opportunity possible by those who had them and didn't like the ones provided).
|
21-11-2008 21:47
Alan Anderson
|
I don't actually know the name of the tan ones we've been getting recently, but very few people that have used the old standbys like them better.
|
21-11-2008 23:20
wilsonmw04|
Those off-white right-hand-only joysticks are labeled "A/B". I typically called them the "POS" joysticks, though. They're capable of being modified to work well, but out of the box they are...poor.
|
22-11-2008 10:05
Qbranch
I'll be very interested to see how the new fuseblock does under high current loads... PC boards have amazed me in the past with how much current traces can handle, but... I just don't know. 4 cims running at max fuse current. That can happen for a few moments as you're accelerating... I'll be interested to see if the voltage supply to the motors drops a rediculous amount. I mean, that's 160A trying to push through a PC board... the same thing we use a giant block of gold plated copper to do now. Just seems like either we're WAY overdoing it with the current maxi block, or the PC board will be overwhelmed... anyone care to offer their opinion on this?
What are the little blue things to the right of the OI panel (there are three of them sitting on black antistatic bags)?
I can hardly wait for us to get ours... I so want to see how much of the vision tools suite they gave teams.
-q
22-11-2008 10:28
ebmonon36|
What are the little blue things to the right of the OI panel (there are three of them sitting on black antistatic bags)?
-q |
22-11-2008 13:12
Eugene Fang
|
What are the little blue things to the right of the OI panel (there are three of them sitting on black antistatic bags)?
|
|
Those are the analog and pneumatic breakouts (formerly called bumpers)
|
22-11-2008 14:26
Joe Ross
|
I'll be very interested to see how the new fuseblock does under high current loads... PC boards have amazed me in the past with how much current traces can handle, but... I just don't know. 4 cims running at max fuse current. That can happen for a few moments as you're accelerating... I'll be interested to see if the voltage supply to the motors drops a rediculous amount. I mean, that's 160A trying to push through a PC board... the same thing we use a giant block of gold plated copper to do now. Just seems like either we're WAY overdoing it with the current maxi block, or the PC board will be overwhelmed... anyone care to offer their opinion on this?
|
|
I can hardly wait for us to get ours... I so want to see how much of the vision tools suite they gave teams.
|
22-11-2008 15:09
Alan Anderson
|
I'll be very interested to see how the new fuseblock does under high current loads...
|
22-11-2008 19:58
NickE|
any "old timer" in FIRST is going to miss those flight sticks, nothing too flashy, just a solid piece of equipment
|
23-11-2008 01:26
Brandon Holley
|
You don't have to miss them. (assuming you have them or can find a place to buy them) We have been using our old flightsticks with success on our beta bot, and it gives us a faster boot up time than when using usb joysticks.
|
23-11-2008 01:36
AdamHeard
|
We have them, but from what I understand there is currently no place to purchase them, which would technically make them an illegal item, according to last years rules concerning COTS items.
|
23-11-2008 01:47
EricH
|
Why were they legal the last 4 seasons then? I agree with your reasoning, but there was a separate rule that allowed them I beleive.
|
23-11-2008 01:50
sanddrag|
Why were they legal the last 4 seasons then? I agree with your reasoning, but there was a separate rule that allowed them I beleive.
|
23-11-2008 21:17
Jeff Pahl
23-11-2008 22:30
Brandon Holley
|
Why were they legal the last 4 seasons then? I agree with your reasoning, but there was a separate rule that allowed them I beleive.
|