|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
More Solid Works wizardry. a nice reduction on a bane bots motor. I haven't finished what it goes onto, but this turned out well, so i decided to throw it up here. Delrin sides, steel gears, and a really sweet animation. I wish y'all could see this thing turn it is awesome!
01-12-2008 09:52
R.C.
Hey dude,
Any specs on it, reductions? Output Torque and fps would be nice. If you want, send me the animation and I could upload it for you.
-RC
01-12-2008 10:12
Tom LineI'm curious - why use the delrin on the sides rather than aluminum? Sure, it's half as dense, but it's also not as stiff and requires a thicker piece and is (in my experience) more expensive.
01-12-2008 10:56
AdamHeard
I'm curious why the sprocket is on the motor side.
Also, what are the specs of the initial reduction; with the commonality between the various Banebots motors and the FP motors, it seems it would be ideal to make this accept any motor (standardized pinion) and possibly multiple. What are you using as the motor pinion? The 15T 32DP from AndyMark seems to be the best choice on the market.
|
I'm curious - why use the delrin on the sides rather than aluminum? Sure, it's half as dense, but it's also not as stiff and requires a thicker piece and is (in my experience) more expensive.
|
01-12-2008 12:19
AndyB
01-12-2008 17:38
ducttapedudeIMO Delrin a solid delrin plate ends up being about the same weight as a heavily machined plate of aluminum but not nearly as rigid. I've seen a few delrin gearboxes and you can seem them flex pretty easily, not anything horrible or dangerous, but noticeable. Also, the threading the in the delrin does not last as well, you can use a nut of course, but, just another con in my opinion.
|
I've found delrin to be uniformly less expensive than aluminum plate of equal thickness. Delrin actually works out rather well, you can leave it nice and thick (1/4" for example), not pocket it out, and still be rather lightweight (equivalent to a about the weight of a 3/32" aluminum plate). If the gearbox is designed correctly for the material, it is plenty stiff. A nicely pocketed 1/4" Aluminum plate is usually in the ballpark of a solid delrin counterpart, and the delrin will take less time to produce (you can cut it faster, and by leaving it solid, have less to cut as well). |
01-12-2008 17:51
Travis Covington|
IMO Delrin a solid delrin plate ends up being about the same weight as a heavily machined plate of aluminum but not nearly as rigid. I've seen a few delrin gearboxes and you can seem them flex pretty easily, not anything horrible or dangerous, but noticeable. Also, the threading the in the delrin does not last as well, you can use a nut of course, but, just another con in my opinion.
|
01-12-2008 20:29
No material is a miracle material; especially not delrin. Each material choice has advantages in specific applications, and thus should be chosen appropriately. Delrin, like aluminum is on the lighter end of the material spectrum. Like Travis said, high torque and heavy reduction applications are best done with something with a little more torsional stiffness.
Delrin does carry certain advantages. Exhibit A: Weight. For most light duty applications in FIRST, such as drive gearbox plates, and lower torque systems, delrin is quite well suited. Its a fairly soft material, which makes machining the plates incredibly easy and fast. It can be less expensive than aluminum of equal size if you know where to look. Exhibit B: Style. Admit it, a lot of teams care about this. Far more than will openly say so. Delrin can be found in nice clean colors, which can add aesthetics to a robot when chosen wisely. Exhibit C: Machine time. Less units of work for more than satisfactory strength make Delrin a mighty tempting material.
However, if a team doesn't spend their time doing some math and stress calculations, the weight gains will be for naught when a major component shears.
Team 114 had great success in building our drive gearbox sideplates out of Delrin. A few tips from what we learned: Washers. If you don't put washers on your bolts, you'll dent the delrin and lose strength. Machining wise, it's a joy to work with. We were able to produce all of our gearbox plates in house on a tiny little desktop CNC. Weight wise, they turned out insanely light.
01-12-2008 22:51
roboticWanderorThis is not that heavy of a reduction, just 24:1. the only thing i am really worried about is the mount of the actual motor, I had to bore into the delrin a bit to get the motor pinion far enough out the other side, making the material that holds in the motor is 1/8 thick instead of 1/4 like the rest of the gearbox. However, it's a pretty high rpm, low torque motor, so I wouldn't expect it to be taking much force, plus it has thicker material surrounding it...
Oh, and i cant show the video because solidworks does not like to encode it correctly... =(
01-12-2008 22:53
|
This is not that heavy of a reduction, just 24:1. the only thing i am really worried about is the mount of the actual motor, I had to bore into the delrin a bit to get the motor pinion far enough out the other side, making the material that holds in the motor is 1/8 thick instead of 1/4 like the rest of the gearbox. However, it's a pretty high rpm, low torque motor, so I wouldn't expect it to be taking much force, plus it has thicker material surrounding it...
|
02-12-2008 00:08
=Martin=Taylor=We saw the 254 gearboxes in 2007 and were like: "ABS! Of course! Why didn't we think of that!?"
We bought some .25" ABS scraps at Tap for 50 cents each and used them in the trannies.
Had we thought to ask 254 about their robot we may have discovered that they were actually using delrin which is about .4 g/cm^3 denser. 
02-12-2008 00:19
R.C.
|
We saw the 254 gearboxes in 2007 and were like: "ABS! Of course! Why didn't we think of that!?"
We bought some .25" ABS scraps at Tap for 50 cents each and used them in the trannies. Had we thought to ask 254 about their robot we may have discovered that they were actually using delrin which is about .4 g/cm^3 denser. ![]() |
02-12-2008 01:47
=Martin=Taylor=