|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
These are our pods. We are just waiting on 2 motors from andymark and sorry adam were not using vex sensors this year. We ended up going with one motor per pod for independent traction control. Any feedback will be appreciated.
04-02-2009 22:11
Kingofl337You could have at least used vex encoders for the traction control !
Looks good, if you need any help with programming let me know. :-)
04-02-2009 23:04
=Martin=Taylor=Yikes!
Do you really need that much torque? 4 CIMs with a big reduction?
04-02-2009 23:27
Jetweb|
Yikes!
Do you really need that much torque? 4 CIMs with a big reduction? |
05-02-2009 00:20
JohnnyThe output and drive sprockets look like a 1:1 ratio; the cluster's appear to be a 12:1 reduction just from the looks of it. So yeah, basically tough boxes.
05-02-2009 07:44
psyco_klownYa its toughbox with optional ratio to give us a 8.5:1
05-02-2009 07:54
Team 135Wow that seems like over kill when you have very low traction. We tested our robot and found that power has nothing to do with this game, even in a pushing match.
Looks good though
05-02-2009 08:19
Rosiebotboss
|
Wow that seems like over kill when you have very low traction. We tested our robot and found that power has nothing to do with this game, even in a pushing match.
Looks good though |
05-02-2009 08:28
Al Skierkiewicz
Dana and Rosie,
Looks nice, that ring at the bottom really helps but needs to be a good bearing surface. Have fun!
05-02-2009 08:30
Rosiebotboss
|
Dana and Rosie,
Looks nice, that ring at the bottom really helps but needs to be a good bearing surface. Have fun! |
05-02-2009 11:55
Enigma's puzzlethose look excellent, what i was trying to get my team to build but it isnt currently working.
Gearing them down does give you an advantage, because you will never reach a top speed of a high speed gearbox why do you need it? a slower one makes for higher torque at lower speeds, usually it is a trade off torque for speed, but if you can never get enough acceleration to go full speed trading off for speed is useless. You may not need the torque either but if it ever came down to it the torque would be needed before the speed.
05-02-2009 12:07
MrForbes
Very nice! Are you sure this is the first time you've done it? 
05-02-2009 14:47
Woodworker88Those look very well-made, although the seem very large for the components they contain. I would have moved the gears inboard and tried to get things in a bit closer. That's what we did on 114 in 2005. Swerve modules tend to take up alot of weight and volume, so the smaller, the better.
Excellent work by any means.
05-02-2009 15:37
Lil' Lavery
|
Gearing them down does give you an advantage, because you will never reach a top speed of a high speed gearbox why do you need it? a slower one makes for higher torque at lower speeds, usually it is a trade off torque for speed, but if you can never get enough acceleration to go full speed trading off for speed is useless. You may not need the torque either but if it ever came down to it the torque would be needed before the speed.
|
05-02-2009 15:50
Those things are enormous! (and GORGEOUS!)
I'm curious, could you elaborate on some of your choices for doing this? Specifically, why mount the motor on the module?
05-02-2009 17:13
psyco_klownWell we were looking at trying to keep the weight centralized over the wheels. We also were thinking about suspension on the pods, it would be only 1/4 in travel anyways to absorb some of the vibration on the floor.
06-02-2009 09:37
Rosiebotboss
|
Those things are enormous! (and GORGEOUS!)
I'm curious, could you elaborate on some of your choices for doing this? Specifically, why mount the motor on the module? |