|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
19-04-2009 21:56
keehunI'm so glad to see a rookie on that field
19-04-2009 21:56
spazdemon548I believe the #6 alliance from Newton was 102, 33 and 2970.
Other than that, looks great and thanks for taking the time to make this.
19-04-2009 23:56
AndyB
Sorry about that. Looks like I started with 2970, and then finished with the #7 alliance.
19-04-2009 23:59
Brad Voracek
Top 8 ... (alliance)
awesome.
this year rocked.
20-04-2009 01:29
Lil' Lavery
Interesting how in 3/4 divisions the 1, 2, 5, and 6 ranked alliance advanced out of the QFs (though Curie had all of those aside of 6 lose). In most cases the 1st and 2nd ranked teams deserved to be ranked highly, but the margins were much closer of the other alliances and the serpentine helped the lower seeds.
1561, not 561, was the captain of Archimedes #4. Also, it was 155, not 1555, on Archimedes 7.
Also, I'm assuming it's supposed to be ordered in terms of captain, 1st pick, 2nd pick?
If so there are quite a few changes to be made to at least Archi and Curie.
20-04-2009 08:31
Greg Needel
768 was the last team on the #1 alliance on Newton not 786