|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
The milling for these parts was generously donated by a local machine shop where I have an internship doing engineering related tasks. It's really cool to see your ideas come to life, even if they don't work
23-05-2009 10:00
R.C.
Those are some smexy plates and the CAD looks awesome. Can't wait to see the next edition of parts and renders.
23-05-2009 10:07
sgrecoThat is really cool. I can't wait to see the final version. Nice work.
23-05-2009 11:02
sdcantrell56That is so awesome. You'll have to let us know how the dewalt holds up to the 2 cims. Ive toyed around with this idea for a while but after Rush's problems with it last year moved on. It would be cool if you get it to work.
23-05-2009 13:35
Andrew SchreiberWhat do you mean by they don't work? What about them is wrong?
23-05-2009 18:53
sdcantrell56|
What do you mean by they don't work? What about them is wrong?
|
23-05-2009 19:03
Andrew Schreiber|
I would say that having the output shafts break in 2008 would be a sign that something wasn't working. I know this year they used dewalts as well, but the shock loading on the shafts was significantly reduced from 2008. I would imagine that the chain that lewis is using will serve as a bit of a shock absorber and reduce the amount of broken shafts or star keys. I know when I am designing a drivetrain, I want to never have to work on it other than tensioning chain. Having to replace a shaft or even a dewalt every so often is not a viable option in my opinion.
|
23-05-2009 20:32
sdcantrell56|
Thanks for clearing that up. I must have missed where he said that.
|
26-05-2009 12:39
Tom LineI'm curious why you're supporting the CIM shafts with bearings. We've never needed to do so and it seems like you could cut a significant amount of weight out of the system by clipping that chunk of your backing plate out.