Go to Post Oh, you know us...kicking puppies and stealing candy from babies and all. :rolleyes: - Travis Hoffman [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



6WD Chassis

Rion Atkinson

By: Rion Atkinson
New: 27-08-2009 08:03
Updated: 27-08-2009 08:03
Views: 1466 times


6WD Chassis

6@D chassis idea I had. Any comments/improvements would be appreciated.

Specs:
Wheel are null. I am currently designing a wheel. Until that is done those wheels are the to take up space.
AM SS for the gear boxes.
2 Sidecars just to show they can fit.
The battery would be kept in by a strap the goes over the top.
It weighs a whoping 59 lbs with all the electronics shown.

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Reply

27-08-2009 11:25

Jared Russell


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

1) Great job! Thanks for sharing.

2) You could probably eliminate some of those vertical supports and still have sufficient frame rigidity.

3) 59 lbs sounds a little heavy for what is pictured (are you including the battery in this weight?). What kind of material, e.g. wall thickness, is your structural tubing?



27-08-2009 12:27

Akash Rastogi


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared341 View Post
1) Great job! Thanks for sharing.

2) You could probably eliminate some of those vertical supports and still have sufficient frame rigidity.

3) 59 lbs sounds a little heavy for what is pictured (are you including the battery in this weight?). What kind of material, e.g. wall thickness, is your structural tubing?
The vertical supports in the rear of the frame can be reduced/ be placed in larger increments depending on what goes on top. Also, based on the game, you'd always have the chance of removing the front cross rail and replacing it with an opening.

EricH suggested 1/8" wall tubing, but this was when Rion had a single tier frame (no vertical supports and no top half) so would 1/16" wall be sufficient in this two tier frame?(vertical supports with top half)



27-08-2009 12:35

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jared341 View Post
2) You could probably eliminate some of those vertical supports and still have sufficient frame rigidity.

3) 59 lbs sounds a little heavy for what is pictured (are you including the battery in this weight?). What kind of material, e.g. wall thickness, is your structural tubing?

Thanks for the supports advice. I will definitely pull some out.


Ya.. i was thinking it was a little heavy... Yes the battery is included. The wood board... Inventor thinks that is Aluminum 6061, I can't find a wood option and it was originally going to be that.

The frame is made of 1" extruded aluminum(sides are 1/8").



27-08-2009 13:29

Tom Line


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

You're going for the wide chassis footprint rather than the narrow.

You don't need 6 wheels to rocker a wide chassis - it turns fairly well with 4.



27-08-2009 13:33

sanddrag


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

I would definitely keep 1/8" wall for the outside perimeter, and I would question the need for that upper deck. I like the battery box. You may consider flipping the battery around, and putting a mounting tab to hard mount the Anderson Powerpole connector to the box.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
You don't need 6 wheels to rocker a wide chassis - it turns fairly well with 4.
Having the middle wheel could be useful for games with ramps, such as 2006. 696 did a design similar to this, and it allowed them to use 3.5" wheels and have only 3/16" ground clearance, and still negotiate the ramp without high centering.



27-08-2009 13:54

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom Line View Post
You're going for the wide chassis footprint rather than the narrow.
Actually. I will be designing a narrow as well. I figured I would "perfect", so to speak, the wide chassis first.

Quote:
Originally Posted by sanddrag View Post
I would definitely keep 1/8" wall for the outside perimeter, and I would question the need for that upper deck.
The upper deck is actually what I used to mount the AM SS....



27-08-2009 16:36

BrendanB


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

One suggestion, I wouldn't have the C'rio up against the front in case you get a hard it. It happens a lot. I don't think any team wants to have the most expensive piece of there robot be destroyed.



27-08-2009 19:31

Dillon Carey


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

What is the indent in the front for?



27-08-2009 19:44

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillon Carey View Post
What is the indent in the front for?
Nothing really.. I could move it forward, but there is really no need.. Save weight! (Even if only around .5 lbs...)



27-08-2009 20:58

Akash Rastogi


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by BrendanB View Post
One suggestion, I wouldn't have the C'rio up against the front in case you get a hard it. It happens a lot. I don't think any team wants to have the most expensive piece of there robot be destroyed.
Actually, many teams mounted their cRIO that way and even perpendicular to the ground. Even without zipties, I don't think any team had loose modules or a broken cRIO. It can take impacts pretty well.



27-08-2009 22:17

Dillon Carey


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formerly Famous View Post
Nothing really.. I could move it forward, but there is really no need.. Save weight! (Even if only around .5 lbs...)
Ok, i was thinking you were trying to plan ahead for some sort of pick up system.



28-08-2009 12:19

Taylor


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

I assume the tabs along the sides are for bumper attachment. Given the limited hand space there, are you thinking cotter pins through bolts to hold them on?



28-08-2009 14:10

kramarczyk


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
Actually, many teams mounted their cRIO that way and even perpendicular to the ground. Even without zipties, I don't think any team had loose modules or a broken cRIO. It can take impacts pretty well.
Yeah, the cRio has been known to take a beating.
http://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-6176

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
I assume the tabs along the sides are for bumper attachment. Given the limited hand space there, are you thinking cotter pins through bolts to hold them on?
We used some quick release pins from McMaster-Carr (p/n 98320A140) on two robots this year. No bottom access required. We had zero perfomance issues and zero inspection issues (some of the inspectors actually liked them).



28-08-2009 16:49

AndyB


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by kramarczyk View Post
Yeah, the cRio has been known to take a beating.
http://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-6176
Very interesting. I knew the cRio could take a hit, but that's unbelievable.

I would have no concerns about moving your cRio. Just make sure it's easy to access.

You'd be safe using 50 lb/ft^3 density for your wood panel. Aluminum is about 3 times that (I just looked up the densities for for particle board and 6061 aluminum for these numbers). http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wo...sity-d_40.html has a list of densities for various types of wood.



28-08-2009 16:56

BrendanB


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by kramarczyk View Post
Yeah, the cRio has been known to take a beating.
http://decibel.ni.com/content/docs/DOC-6176
[/IMG]
WOW!!!!

That really does take a beating. Guess I now know what is the strongest part of the robot.



28-08-2009 17:10

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dillon Carey View Post
Ok, i was thinking you were trying to plan ahead for some sort of pick up system.
That was the original plan, but there isn't really enough room... I could always make the chassis bigger than 35 x 25...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Taylor View Post
I assume the tabs along the sides are for bumper attachment. Given the limited hand space there, are you thinking cotter pins through bolts to hold them on?
Pretty much yes.



28-08-2009 17:19

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by AndyB View Post
You'd be safe using 50 lb/ft^3 density for your wood panel. Aluminum is about 3 times that (I just looked up the densities for for particle board and 6061 aluminum for these numbers). http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/wo...sity-d_40.html has a list of densities for various types of wood.
The only problem is wood is not an option to choose from.. And I don't if you can manually change the density in Inventor...



28-08-2009 21:19

EricH


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formerly Famous View Post
The only problem is wood is not an option to choose from.. And I don't if you can manually change the density in Inventor...
You can. I forget how, but you can. And if wood isn't an option, then I just lost respect for Inventor. You go into the properties, and pick your type of wood--pine or oak should do the trick. (It doesn't have "wood" as an option because every wood is a different type of wood, and has a different density.)



28-08-2009 23:20

MrForbes


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Somehow we modeled ours in Inventor last winter...huh....

http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...ad.php?t=71902



29-08-2009 13:19

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricH View Post
And if wood isn't an option, then I just lost respect for Inventor. You go into the properties, and pick your type of wood--pine or oak should do the trick. (It doesn't have "wood" as an option because every wood is a different type of wood, and has a different density.)
I went through all materials. Not a single type of wood. In the 2009 Inventor There was. They were listed as "Wood (Pine)" or "Wood(Oak)". But when they upgraded to 2010 they must have take it out...

Quote:
Originally Posted by squirrel View Post
Somehow we modeled ours in Inventor last winter...huh....
It is possible to just change the texture (As I did). But odds are you made it in 2009.



29-08-2009 14:15

Akash Rastogi


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formerly Famous View Post
I went through all materials. Not a single type of wood. In the 2009 Inventor There was. They were listed as "Wood (Pine)" or "Wood(Oak)". But when they upgraded to 2010 they must have take it out...



It is possible to just change the texture (As I did). But odds are you made it in 2009.
Are there certain add-ins that you don't have enabled? I don't use Inventor but just a suggestion.



29-08-2009 15:34

GUI


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

I don't remember exactly where it is, but in the iProperties of a part you can change the density to a custom value.



29-08-2009 16:39

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi View Post
Are there certain add-ins that you don't have enabled? I don't use Inventor but just a suggestion.
No. All the other add-ins not enabled are just converters for other CAD programs..

Quote:
Originally Posted by GUI View Post
I don't remember exactly where it is, but in the iProperties of a part you can change the density to a custom value.
I went through all the IProperties.. Couldn't find it...


I think its time to switch to solidworks..



29-08-2009 17:08

MrForbes


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

You definitely want to be using a wood friendly modeling program. Wood is where it's at.



29-08-2009 17:13

Rion Atkinson


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Maybe I'll switch back to Inventor 2009 until I can get solidworks somehow....



29-08-2009 19:25

R.C.


Unread Re: pic: 6WD Chassis

Quote:
Originally Posted by Formerly Famous View Post
Maybe I'll switch back to Inventor 2009 until I can get solidworks somehow....
Just to Support Solidworks. One of the main benefits with Solidworks is that it is used more in the industry. In our area 12 out our 15 sponsoring (Engineering Companies) companies use Solidworks. Most of their partners use it also.

Also Solidworks has a wide range of add ins and the workflow is Fantastic. If you want a Copy of Solidworks, Marie Planchard would be the person to contact, Solidworks Rep for FIRST.

-RC



view entire thread

Reply
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 13:43.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi