|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This was just something I mocked up as a drivetrain base we could use for any contracts we receive by sponsorships. This one has the colors for the Tampa Bay Rays. Any changes that should be made? The large amount of 80/20 was to allow anything to be attached to it as a manipulator for whatever we would have to design
-Approx 30lbs
-6 wheel drive system
-AM Toughbox
-2 AM 8" Performance wheels
-4 AM 8" Omni Wheels
-36" 1/4" thick Aluminum side plates. 5"wide
-80/20 Reinforcement
-#25 Chain
-Direct drive to the center wheels
Bryan Gallo
04-10-2009 23:18
Akash RastogiBefore anyone flips about the pocketing on this...
Note that this is for sponsored robots, not for competition use. IE: t shirt launchers
04-10-2009 23:23
Nick Lawrence
Looks like fun.
Even with it not being a competition robot, I'd still be a little worried on the pocketing. Would having a little less of it be out of question?
-Nick
04-10-2009 23:28
gallo26|
Even with it not being a competition robot, I'd still be a little worried on the pocketing. Would having a little less of it be out of question?
|
04-10-2009 23:39
AdamHeard
The fact that it's not for comp is even more reason not to pocket it.
Just leave the 1/4" plate solid, it'll be stronger, prettier, and waaaaaaaaaaay quicker to manufacture. It will also make the base more stable for whatever it's being used for.
04-10-2009 23:44
gburlison6 wheel drive and all that pocketing seems like a lot of work for a non-competition robot.
04-10-2009 23:49
gallo26|
The fact that it's not for comp is even more reason not to pocket it.
Just leave the 1/4" plate solid, it'll be stronger, prettier, and waaaaaaaaaaay quicker to manufacture. It will also make the base more stable for whatever it's being used for. |
04-10-2009 23:52
rsisk| Before anyone flips about the pocketing on this... |
04-10-2009 23:53
R.C.
05-10-2009 01:10
James Tonthat
Maybe higher ground clearance. If its noncompetition, I can see it going around sidewalks, pavements and grassy areas.
05-10-2009 02:42
M. MellottYou plan on using 25-series chain to drive the omnis...how will you tension the chains? Also make sure the alignment between each pair of sprockets is acurate.
With 8" wheels and a 5"-wide plate (assuming wheel centers are in the center of the plate--at least it looks that way) gives you a 1.5" ground clearance? Should be OK.
I have to agree with others that you need more meat on the side plates...1" on the webs at least, and big radii in the corners of the pockets. Always start with a strong base, even if it's not for competition.
80/20 is good stuff, but you have to watch that the bolts holding the frame together don't come loose--they always seem to eventually. If you're not going to take it apart, you may want to consider Lok-tite (or tack welds).
All that said, it looks like a solid, simple design that should go together very quickly.
05-10-2009 09:32
Tom LineI would be concerned with the front and rear driven omni-wheels. In our experience, having no side-force resistance to turning will lead to a robot that is very difficult to accelerate in a straight line.
05-10-2009 10:19
Jeff 801It appears as though you are using AM toughboxes, you might want to leave the cover over the gears to keep dirt and FOD out of the gears and grease.
05-10-2009 10:31
artdutra04
|
It appears as though you are using AM toughboxes, you might want to leave the cover over the gears to keep dirt and FOD out of the gears and grease.
|
05-10-2009 10:36
Chris is meI'm still a little confused as to why this chassis is being built with weight in mind (other than to keep it liftable, roughly under 150ish pounds), but it looks simple and effective.
05-10-2009 12:21
gallo26|
I would be concerned with the front and rear driven omni-wheels. In our experience, having no side-force resistance to turning will lead to a robot that is very difficult to accelerate in a straight line.
|
|
You plan on using 25-series chain to drive the omnis...how will you tension the chains? Also make sure the alignment between each pair of sprockets is acurate.
|
|
It appears as though you are using AM toughboxes, you might want to leave the cover over the gears to keep dirt and FOD out of the gears and grease.
|
|
I'm still a little confused as to why this chassis is being built with weight in mind (other than to keep it liftable, roughly under 150ish pounds), but it looks simple and effective.
|
05-10-2009 16:55
AdamHeard
I'd recommend ditching the wedgetop tead and omni wheels for normal solid rubber wheels like colsons.
They're cheaper, and won't need replacing/maintenance.
05-10-2009 20:47
cdeboBryan,
Nice work. I am trying to get my class to evaluate different disigns with different materials. Could i get a copy of the CAD file? It would help with the analysis.
05-10-2009 21:01
R.C.
|
Bryan,
Nice work. I am trying to get my class to evaluate different disigns with different materials. Could i get a copy of the CAD file? It would help with the analysis. |
05-10-2009 22:28
gallo26Yeah! there are 5 up there. 2006-2009 are very durable tank drive drivetrain systems. They've been through pretty harsh competitions, and worse yet, off-season, and they've lasted through that. If you have any questions about any of those designs i'll be more than happy to help. PM me or email me.
I'll try to post more drivetrains on the team hosting website. I have a few on here, along with our T Shirt Shooting Robot the Screamin' Eagle! I just need to finish up some work on it.
05-10-2009 22:50
DonRotolo
Nice work.
Consider making the thin strips that lead from the edges to the wheel axles a bit thicker, perhaps like a filled-in "X" or hourglass shape instead of an "I".
We used a similar system of 80/20 in 2009 and it worked out very well.
I also like the concept of using the strength and stiffness of the bumpers as a structural element. Some spots for mounting them would be wise.
06-10-2009 00:25
steelerbornLooks cool
We used a similar design for Overdrive
in fact we used the same middle wheels
it worked out well
it would be great for contacts
We are working on somethig for contacts as well
06-10-2009 09:19
Joe Ross
You mentioned cheerleaders lifting it, who's going to be driving it? 8" wheels direct driven from a toughbox is about 14 feet per second. It takes a lot of practice to be able to control a robot at that speed. That doesn't seem wise for a demo robot that is either being driven by inexperienced drivers or driven around people.
06-10-2009 12:14
gallo26|
You mentioned cheerleaders lifting it, who's going to be driving it? 8" wheels direct driven from a toughbox is about 14 feet per second. It takes a lot of practice to be able to control a robot at that speed. That doesn't seem wise for a demo robot that is either being driven by inexperienced drivers or driven around people.
|
10-10-2009 21:39
joeweber|
You plan on using 25-series chain to drive the omnis...how will you tension the chains?
|
11-10-2009 00:54
artdutra04
|
If you layout your sprockets and chain flat on a table you can get the dimensions center to center of the axels and you will not need tensioners. We did this on our test bot and it worked pritty good.
|

30-10-2009 21:09
kevincrispieA robot only really needs a few motors. You could swervedrive it or use tank steering, where you have two motors, one on each side, and them power three wheels on each side if you wanted that many.