Go to Post "my life is incomplete, my nose has lost the imprint of my safety goggles." - Nin_estarSaerah [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

railerobotics

By: railerobotics
New: 16-01-2010 13:23
Updated: 16-01-2010 13:23
Views: 1673 times


Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Could it be mecanum for the fourth year??

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Reply

17-01-2010 00:19

Stuart


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Im guessing by the amount of Pizza Hut/Mountain Dew in the picture that this will have some serious code going on in it.



17-01-2010 10:55

scottydoh


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Based on the two mecanum and two IFI traction wheels, Im going to guess some sort of hybrid mecanum/skid drive...And as stated, alot of programming based on the amount of Mountian Dew...



17-01-2010 13:50

Tom Line


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

That is remarkable progress! Having settled on a strategy and concept, completely designed a brand new design in CAD, and gotten it into the cutting machines and machined all by the end of the first week is pretty amazing!



17-01-2010 14:13

p8blr


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

That is a sexy chassis



17-01-2010 15:44

Gary.C


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stuart View Post
Im guessing by the amount of Pizza Hut/Mountain Dew in the picture that this will have some serious code going on in it.
You forgot the AMP



17-01-2010 16:03

Chris is me


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Can someone explain to me the vector math behind a two mecanum two traction system (as opposed to two traction two omni)? I've tried to figure it out but I honestly can't get it to "work" in a way that would make sense to ever use in a drivetrain.



17-01-2010 16:17

J_Beth


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Can someone explain to me the vector math behind a two mecanum two traction system (as opposed to two traction two omni)? I've tried to figure it out but I honestly can't get it to "work" in a way that would make sense to ever use in a drivetrain.
I think that the traction wheels are used to supplement the mecanum drive.



17-01-2010 16:39

Tom I


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Can someone explain to me the vector math behind a two mecanum two traction system (as opposed to two traction two omni)? I've tried to figure it out but I honestly can't get it to "work" in a way that would make sense to ever use in a drivetrain.
I'm still not positive on this, but if they have a hybrid traction/mecanum drive, then it would behave semi-similar to traction/omni, with a few differences. True, there would be some vector differences, which I still haven't figured out yet, but think about this: One main down side to traction/omni that I've always seen is you get pushed, a lot. Another robot can push on the side of your bot with the omni, and your robot will be turned unless you fight it. This seems to be a solution to that, because the rollers on two mecanum don't line up like the rollers on two onmi, so there'd be resistance there, fighting the turning of the robot. If this works, it seems like a pretty good idea.



17-01-2010 16:59

PAR_WIG1350


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

i'm not sure mt.dew & amp are allowable energy storage devices.



17-01-2010 17:07

Chris is me


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tom I View Post
I'm still not positive on this, but if they have a hybrid traction/mecanum drive, then it would behave semi-similar to traction/omni, with a few differences. True, there would be some vector differences, which I still haven't figured out yet, but think about this: One main down side to traction/omni that I've always seen is you get pushed, a lot. Another robot can push on the side of your bot with the omni, and your robot will be turned unless you fight it. This seems to be a solution to that, because the rollers on two mecanum don't line up like the rollers on two onmi, so there'd be resistance there, fighting the turning of the robot. If this works, it seems like a pretty good idea.
Couldn't you accomplish this to a similar extent with a lower traction front wheel (say, rubber front, wedgetop back), but for much cheaper?



17-01-2010 17:20

Tom I


Unread Re: pic: Team 935 RaileRobotics Teaser #1

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me View Post
Couldn't you accomplish this to a similar extent with a lower traction front wheel (say, rubber front, wedgetop back), but for much cheaper?
Of course you could. I wasn't saying this was the best way to do it, I was just speculating on what they could be doing with this picture. Besides, who knows, those added vectors could give this drive train a better advantage that we're not seeing currently.



view entire thread

Reply
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 14:43.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi