|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Our robot for the 2010 FRC Season : Armadillo
A video of it in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_hTyXQUgYLE
21-02-2010 20:23
Matt704That robot looks awesome! Great job!
21-02-2010 20:28
Nevets AmstierNet response from 229:
WHAAAAAAAAAAAAT????!!!!!
wow unbelievably impressive
I wish we were going to a regional with you guys
21-02-2010 20:28
AndrewMorrisonThe biggest compliment I can give is that I am frightened to ever see you in competition.

Awesome job!
21-02-2010 20:30
carbuff2228very nice robot wish we were competing with you
21-02-2010 20:38
GaryVoshol
Wow, looks great. I think I owe someone an apology.
21-02-2010 20:38
AcesJamesAfter about a minute drool started pouring from my open mouth onto the keyboard. Not only does 148 ALWAYS have a very functional robot, they ALWAYS have something innovative, and they ALWAYS have something very pleasing to the eye. Excellent job on the robot, guys. Cant wait to take a peak at Armadillo in Atlanta.
21-02-2010 20:53
BrendanBMan, that bot is beautiful! But a life size doll of JVN, really?
Looking good!
21-02-2010 20:53
MrForbes
Beautiful job, team 148 should be proud!
21-02-2010 20:55
Paul Copioli| I wish we were going to a regional with you guys |
21-02-2010 20:58
Joe J.
As always that robot looks absolutely amazing
21-02-2010 20:58
Nevets Amstier
)
21-02-2010 20:59
AndrewMorrison|
good luck then
(memories of 2005 are coming to mind...cough *division by chicken* cough ) |
21-02-2010 21:00
Karibou
You should have seen how much my jaw just dropped. A fabulous robot as always; well done 148!
Now, where's 217's? 
21-02-2010 21:04
Matt704I look forward to seeing y'all in Dallas AND Houston. I hope we match up with y'all and not against y'all like last year.
21-02-2010 21:05
KC1AJT
21-02-2010 21:06
Koko Ed
When we saw the robot flip up on the tower like that in the video we completely freaked!
21-02-2010 21:08
wo-bot 141this is why im glad your in Texas and im in Michigan.. very nice. good luck
21-02-2010 21:11
V_Chip
21-02-2010 21:14
DarkFlame145WOW, amazing that looks so sweet
21-02-2010 21:16
XaulZan11Very very cool as usual.
Its a good thing there were no refs to catch the penalty at 2:29sih, though
703 from 2007 may not longer be the coolest 14 wheeled robot.
21-02-2010 21:16
JaneYoung
The Robowranglers are going to be quite a draw in the pit area this year - as always. It's going to be great!
21-02-2010 21:19
waialua359|
this is why im glad your in Texas and im in Michigan.. very nice. good luck
![]() |
21-02-2010 21:20
waialua359
21-02-2010 21:21
coldfusion1279So, I will take the bait.
I see you experimenting with rollers, I don't see the ball rolling in the video when you hold it...
I didn't see a pic of experimenting with suction (at least not obviously), but the ball is behaving like it is sucked in place.
So what are you using to hold the ball, and how did you adapt it so that you could hold the ball in place in (what looks like) the entire width of the front of your robot?
Great design. Nice work.
21-02-2010 21:26
gorrillaI dont know what to think about our robot now 
21-02-2010 21:29
Chuck Glick
I have to agree with Kressly on this one. Sweet Jesus.
148 knows how to build their bots down there in Greenville and this year is clearly no exception. I bet this bot is quite successful this season, and guess what, rumor has it that they have improvements already planned.
Be afraid everyone, be very afraid.
Grats to everyone at RoboWranglers for putting out yet another quality bot. Everyone should strive to achieve the quality of build that 148 is known for.
21-02-2010 21:33
cziggy343sweet mother... that is very very impressive...
21-02-2010 21:40
Phreadumb
Excuse me while I go change my pants!
21-02-2010 21:47
viney1503
21-02-2010 21:49
MrForbes
Naw, that would never happen.
21-02-2010 21:55
robotnerd17Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
21-02-2010 22:06
Cory
|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 22:13
hipsterjrI am in love and scared to death of that thing. Looks like it eats small children. Props for the articulating drive.
21-02-2010 22:22
Brandon Holley
pfft...thats it? I thought you guys would come up with something a little more impressive...
Seriously though, what an impressive feat of engineering. Can you elaborate on the drive setup?
21-02-2010 22:22
Karthik
Another amazing creation by the Robowranglers. These guys are by far the best team in FIRST at creating highly competitive robots that look like something that you would see on a showroom floor. I had the opportunity to spend a week with these guys during the build season and was blown away by how well this team functioned. Everyone knows about their all-star mentor base, but they also have some of the most ingenious students that I have ever met in this program. It's neat to see the "final" versions of the prototypes that I saw being work on in week 2. (In fact a couple of these prototypes had significant influence on the 2010 1114 robot.)
Congratulations on an amazing machine. I can't wait to see it in Atlanta and maybe even sooner...
21-02-2010 22:22
Chuck Glick
21-02-2010 22:22
Paul Copioli|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 22:22
Ian Curtis
Since you guys are right down the road from Caddo Mills Airport where Armadillo Aerospace does their thing, do you ever have any interaction with them?
Nice robot too! 
EDIT: After watching this video a few more times, I think that this may be the year that one robot can carry 2 BLTs... Wowsers!
21-02-2010 22:23
samir13k|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
which I probably wont, but i feel bad for whoever does! The lifter is SWEEEEET! and I am also extremely curious as to how you hold those balls so well?! Is it classified? or will you spill the beans
21-02-2010 22:28
IndySam
Common Paul tell us how you really feel.
But seriously you have not only inspired students but also fellow mentors who in turn have inspired other students so your influence is exponential.
21-02-2010 22:30
Cory
|
(In fact a couple of these prototypes had significant influence on the 2010 1114 robot.
|
21-02-2010 22:32
Phreadumb
I agree with Paul Copioli, if engineers aren't working with students side by side the students are not getting INSPIRED to be science and technology heros. This robonerd17 guy should not underestimate the minds of students either.
21-02-2010 22:35
Chuck Glick
Something tells me that 148, 217, 254, and 1114 all have a little something in common this year...
Is this the year that team IFI blows all competition out of the water?
21-02-2010 22:36
BradMelloVery impressive kicking accuracy and elevating abilities.
Hope to play with you guys at the Championships!
21-02-2010 22:37
dodar|
Something tells me that 148, 217, 254, and 1114 all have a little something in common this year...
Is this the year that team IFI blows all competition out of the water? |
21-02-2010 22:38
tim_reiherWow..... that looks really impressive! and it has underglow to boot!
Great job guys, i can't wait to see it in a real match!
21-02-2010 22:42
dlavery
The best keep getting better. Well done guys.
-dave
p.s. and after watching Parker in action myself over the summer, I will echo Samir's earlier comment - never underestimate a student!
.
21-02-2010 22:45
Alex Cormier
I am very scared to see the bright green version of this in 1.5 weeks.
21-02-2010 22:57
Akash RastogiExpletive expletive expletive expletive expletive expletive expletive
You guys are expletive amazing. I haven't "Wow'd" for a robot like that (nor has my bro was was in FRC 10 years ago) in all my 4 years.
Holy expletive
21-02-2010 23:00
JVN|
So, I will take the bait.
I see you experimenting with rollers, I don't see the ball rolling in the video when you hold it... I didn't see a pic of experimenting with suction (at least not obviously), but the ball is behaving like it is sucked in place. So what are you using to hold the ball, and how did you adapt it so that you could hold the ball in place in (what looks like) the entire width of the front of your robot? Great design. Nice work. |

21-02-2010 23:01
Karibou
|
I am very scared to see the bright green version of this in 1.5 weeks.
|
21-02-2010 23:01
JesseKTHANK YOU 148!
For not posting an odd, out of focus, random, or otherwise not-really-a-teaser teaser. The teaser here is in trying to figure out how this thing works, and it has some kick $@#$@#$@# music to boot. Looks great, hope to see you in Atlanta!
21-02-2010 23:02
JVN|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 23:14
ChrisWow, just wow.
First off great video, of course its somewhat easier when you have such great material to work with.
The drive-train is spiffy as heck, (congrats to John, Paul, Parker, Charles, and the rest of 148), and whats even more impressive than the drive set up is the amount of omni-directional control you appear to have, which with that kind of mechanical set up is very impressive.
The kicker looks simple, powerful and effective.
The hanger looks like one of the few I've seen that looks like it should work in 5 seconds or less
And the very "mysterious" ball magnet looks far more effective than anything I've seen to date in teasers, or in person at the Suffield scrimmage.
I can't wait for the tour at champs, you guys have raised the bar again.
The only real issue that I can see is that she really just won't look the same with blue bumpers :-(
21-02-2010 23:16
Ian Curtis
|
Most of these parts were designed by students. They are very complicated. What does that tell you about the students?
I'm so proud of our "kids" I could just explode. -John PS - I think you need a hug. |
|
Originally Posted by CD Reputation Button
You cannot give Reputation twice for the same post.
|
21-02-2010 23:17
Pjohn1959
|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 23:17
bellpride|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 23:18
Akash Rastogi|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 23:18
samir13k
21-02-2010 23:24
s_forbesAwesome! You guys nailed the ball handling, the lifting, and the versatile drive train. I would have expected a variable distance kicker too, but it looks like you have plenty of 'sweet spots' on the field to score reliably from.
Way cool, as usual. Someday I will find a way to see one of your robots in person.
21-02-2010 23:24
EricH
Actually, he needs a few reads of the many and various JVN whitepapers that are out there. Then we'll find out which team he belongs to, at any rate--when they suddenly improve to regular eliminations contenders.
21-02-2010 23:39
Joe G.
|
Hmmm its like I've already seen this robot before....Who designed these parts Paul? Because that seems very complicated for a couple of students.
|
21-02-2010 23:44
Chuck Glick
After looking at this photo yet another time, this bot keeps looking more and more like the next version of the M1 Abrams Tank.
John, is IFI doing military contracts now? 
21-02-2010 23:57
EgROSWOW!
Thats really all I can say, this robot has left me speechless.
I can't wait to see ya'll at lonestar!
22-02-2010 00:39
Jonathan Norris
You guys certainly brought the WOW factor this year. Another inspiring engineering feat with this years bot. As I said earlier in the year i'm really impressed with how well you use the amazing resources available to your team to their fullest abilities to produce beautiful robots.
22-02-2010 00:48
Andrew Schreiber|
Most of these parts were designed by students. They are very complicated. What does that tell you about the students?
I'm so proud of our "kids" I could just explode. -John PS - I think you need a hug. |
22-02-2010 00:52
MrForbes
|
PS - For anyone who followed my build journal on facebook, the ball magnet is the "System #5" I kept cursing during week 2 and 3.
|
22-02-2010 00:52
Brandon Holley
I had a quick question about the drive, when the drivetrain actuates itself from the omnis to the "regular" setup, are the 8 wheels in line or are the 4 traction wheels lower?
-Brando
22-02-2010 00:53
John GThat is one BA looking robot. I bet we'll see it on Einstein. . . .
22-02-2010 01:07
Tom BottiglieriLooks alright, I guess.
22-02-2010 01:18
coldfusion1279|
Most of these parts were designed by students. They are very complicated. What does that tell you about the students?
I'm so proud of our "kids" I could just explode. -John PS - I think you need a hug. |
22-02-2010 01:35
robodude03Wow, just amazing to see the work that both students and mentors put into creating a robot like this. When I create strategies with my team it is always based around playing against such powerful robots such as 148.
Kudos to the entire team and I can't wait to see it in action in the following weeks. Excellent job!
22-02-2010 02:01
Chris FultzRocl On, 148.
Awesome.
22-02-2010 02:41
Tom Bottiglieri|
It's actually very simple. Any team can do it.
The secret is.... 3 weeks of prototyping! ![]() -John PS - For anyone who followed my build journal on facebook, the ball magnet is the "System #5" I kept cursing during week 2 and 3. |
22-02-2010 02:52
TetramanThe play by play as to what I said as it was going up the bar:
"Alright lets see...No, its not going that easy...no it's not going to...oh no really...OH WOAH WHAAAAT??!!!?"
22-02-2010 02:52
Michael Corsetto
Is team IFI taking applications? I have a serious case of ball magnet envy... 
22-02-2010 02:58
=Martin=Taylor=|
It's actually very simple. Any team can do it.
The secret is.... 3 weeks of prototyping! ![]() -John PS - For anyone who followed my build journal on facebook, the ball magnet is the "System #5" I kept cursing during week 2 and 3. |
) and NONE of whom have any experience with tools...
22-02-2010 03:05
Cory
|
You mean "any team with sponsors like IFI who can cut all their parts for them in a couple of days so they have plenty of time to prototype."
Try designing and prototyping an entire robot in two weeks, and then working with a team of amateur machinists and welders (many of whom don't know the imperial system of units ) and NONE of whom have any experience with tools...You build a bot that way, and then I’ll be impressed… No but seriously, I'm freaking impressed ![]() |
22-02-2010 05:00
Koko Ed
|
THANK YOU 148!
For not posting an odd, out of focus, random, or otherwise not-really-a-teaser teaser. The teaser here is in trying to figure out how this thing works, and it has some kick $@#$@#$@# music to boot. Looks great, hope to see you in Atlanta! |
22-02-2010 06:47
Chris is meThere's one build day left for my team, and I just had to see this video of an awesome robot that's basically everything I ever wanted to do plus ten times more. I think I'm crying a little.
Awesome job. The drivetrain, the kicker, the hanger. Aaaah.
22-02-2010 08:09
Travis Hoffman
|
There's one build day left for my team, and I just had to see this video of an awesome robot that's basically everything I ever wanted to do plus ten times more. I think I'm crying a little.
|
22-02-2010 08:31
dlavery
The scariest part of the entire video and discussion is the realization that I know the RoboWranglers will be making the maximum possible use of their 65 pound withholding allowance and the remaining time until their competitions to make this monster ever BETTER. I can't wait to see the real final version.
-dave
.
22-02-2010 08:44
IKE|
The scariest part of the entire video and discussion is the realization that I know the RoboWranglers will be making the maximum possible use of their 65 pound withholding allowance and the remaining time until their competitions to make this monster ever BETTER. I can't wait to see the real final version.
-dave . |
22-02-2010 08:46
Collin Fultz
John, Paul, et al -
Fantastic work once again. Your team(s) continue to inspire the inspired. You guys keep pushing the bar higher and higher and it's robots like this that will cause FIRST to breakthrough into the mainstream.
If I were a high school student on the fence about engineering, seeing this beautiful machine and knowing that I could make something like it one day would push me towards engineering. That's the purpose of this program.
Thanks for posting the video! Good luck, and we'll see you (hopefully beside us and not across from us) in Atlanta.
-Collin
22-02-2010 08:47
lim shi haoI have to admit, the tech you guys have made this Singaporean's eyes popped out.

22-02-2010 09:01
JaneYoung
|
Saw the video last night and I had nightmares. Now that you have mentioned this, I may not be able to sleep again. Very scary indeed!
|
22-02-2010 09:20
Rob
This one is a top contender. Your bot will inspire even those who are not on your team.
Great job!
Rob
22-02-2010 09:33
Ryan Dognaux
Another quality machine from team 148 & friends - I wouldn't expect anything less than the ultimate shutout machine from these guys. Can't wait to see it in action in an actual match.
22-02-2010 09:39
RMS11First off, amazing robot. Ridiculous that yall can pump that out in six weeks. This year we were shooting to make something 1/100th that awesome but unfortunately have thus lost out on a lot of valuable practice time.... :/
Still, compliments to you for such and amazing robot. Crazy....
On the discussion of how their "ball magnet" works, go to 2:28 in the video. As they drive up the hill to push the ball into the goal, the ball is stuck to the robot and hovers. First off, I am pretty sure that it is a roller system, not suction. If the ball isnt rolling and it is a roller system, does that mean the ball is pinched in? Is that really legal, or would that technically be a penalty (because the ball must the tiniest bit off the ground, right???) Is it just designed that the ball is pinched so low to the ground that is barely hovering? Is the roller torqued up so that it basically stalls when the ball is locked in place...? This is the buggiest part of our robot still...
I cant wait to (hopefully) see this thing at atlanta. Luckily, even is we dont make it, I can stop by... Too bad its leaving atlanta next year...
22-02-2010 09:41
Chris is me|
If the ball isnt rolling and it is a roller system, does that mean the ball is pinched in? Is that really legal, or would that technically be a penalty (because the ball must the tiniest bit off the ground, right???)
|
22-02-2010 09:42
dodar|
First off, amazing robot. Ridiculous that yall can pump that out in six weeks. This year we were shooting to make something 1/100th that awesome but unfortunately have thus lost out on a lot of valuable practice time.... :/
Still, compliments to you for such and amazing robot. Crazy.... On the discussion of how their "ball magnet" works, go to 2:28 in the video. As they drive up the hill to push the ball into the goal, the ball is stuck to the robot and hovers. First off, I am pretty sure that it is a roller system, not suction. If the ball isnt rolling and it is a roller system, does that mean the ball is pinched in? Is that really legal, or would that technically be a penalty (because the ball must the tiniest bit off the ground, right???) Is it just designed that the ball is pinched so low to the ground that is barely hovering? Is the roller torqued up so that it basically stalls when the ball is locked in place...? This is the buggiest part of our robot still... I cant wait to (hopefully) see this thing at atlanta. Luckily, even is we dont make it, I can stop by... Too bad its leaving atlanta next year... |
22-02-2010 09:47
RMS11|
I don't follow. What makes a ball wedged under a roller (if it was) lift off the ground? Say the ball does get wedged in that shot. What is supporting it other than the ground?
|
22-02-2010 09:52
Nick Lawrence
Now that, is a robot.
My god is that ever a robot.
That is everything I dreamed of and more, for a championship winning robot.
I want one!
-Nick
22-02-2010 09:55
JesseK|
I had a quick question about the drive, when the drivetrain actuates itself from the omnis to the "regular" setup, are the 8 wheels in line or are the 4 traction wheels lower?
-Brando |
22-02-2010 10:06
MrForbes
|
On the discussion of how their "ball magnet" works, go to 2:28 in the video. As they drive up the hill to push the ball into the goal, the ball is stuck to the robot and hovers.
|
22-02-2010 10:07
dodarso that means they are carrying then, right?
22-02-2010 10:09
MrForbes
I don't know, I'm not a referee
22-02-2010 10:10
Nick Lawrence
Uhm, isn't that bad?
-Nick
22-02-2010 10:14
Cory
That's definitely not how they hold the ball normally. It only occurs when you go too far into the goal. I'm sure they already know they can't do that and are practicing to make sure they never do.
22-02-2010 10:17
Ty TremblayBut is it carrying the ball when the bot is driving around on the flat parts of the playing surface? Technically, the ball could still be touching the ground when the robot is on level ground. But, if the situation in the above picture happens, does that even matter?
I apologize if this has already been covered in an update/Q&A. I'm currently abroad in Thailand and unable to build this year. 
22-02-2010 10:17
Chris FultzTo me, what is most impressive to me is this --
There are many teams that will build their robot, ship it, and compete with it in some events and just fix things when they break. They would be 'satisfied' and take a rest.
Knowing 148 and their mentors, they will take the "design is an iterative process" philosophy and continue to update, revise, modify and improve this machine all they way through the Championships and the machine in April will be much different from the machine that goes into a crate on February 23rd. They will see what other teams have done, they will see what works and what does not, they will see how this game plays out on the field and make the adjustments and maybe make major changes.
That is how great teams do it, and that is how great companies do it.
If you have not, read JVNs design paper, read it.
And once again, great job 148!
22-02-2010 10:27
EricH
I'm not a ref either, but I do know that the GDC has ruled that if the ball is possessed and comes off the ground, it is carrying, period. Now, whether or not the refs catch it is another matter.
Still, with 65 lbs and a couple weeks to work with, I'm sure 148 will come up with something to keep the ball down on the ground.
22-02-2010 10:34
MrForbes
| And once again, great job 148! |
Awesome machine
22-02-2010 10:38
Cory
|
But is it carrying the ball when the bot is driving around on the flat parts of the playing surface? Technically, the ball could still be touching the ground when the robot is on level ground. But, if the situation in the above picture happens, does that even matter?
I apologize if this has already been covered in an update/Q&A. I'm currently abroad in Thailand and unable to build this year. ![]() |
22-02-2010 10:41
MrForbes
|
It's an issue of the drivers letting go of the ball before going too far into the goal.
|
22-02-2010 10:54
JesseKNot saying I know how their ball magnet works, but ...
If they reverse it and make the tip of the roller go the same speed of the drive train x2 then it'd be impossible for them to carry regardless of what the drivers do.
22-02-2010 11:03
Ty TremblayIf you look at 1:54 on the video, you can see a yellow upper roller (if it is a roller) and a black lower roller. You can also see them holding the ball at 2:01. Hope this can help shed some light on the subject.
I love this robot, it's genius. 148 always inspires a little jealousy in me each year.
22-02-2010 11:04
Chris is me|
If the drivers have to let go of the ball, then they were holding onto it, which is what CARRYING is all about?
It looks a bit iffy to us mere mortals. |
22-02-2010 11:06
Greg Marra
I love the hanging. What an amazing looking and capable robot.
22-02-2010 11:10
JVN|
That's definitely not how they hold the ball normally. It only occurs when you go too far into the goal. I'm sure they already know they can't do that and are practicing to make sure they never do.
|
22-02-2010 11:17
ks_mumupsiI look forward to seeing this in Dallas... impressive.
22-02-2010 11:37
Paul CopioliWith regards to the ball magnet, think of it this way:
If the normal force between the ball and the floor is less than the normal force generated between the ball and the "magnets", then the ball will stay possessed by the robot. This doesn't mean the normal force between the ball and the floor is zero.
The instance you see in the video near the goal was an implementation issue that has already been resolved. The ball will always be touching the floor when the magnet is on.
I can tell you this: we (148 + 217) created the ball magnet concept using only 9th grade geometry and 11th grade physics (1st semester).
22-02-2010 11:41
sanddrag|
Try designing and prototyping an entire robot in two weeks, and then working with a team of amateur machinists and welders
|
But seriously, this is why their robot is good. It all comes down to material removal. The secret is in the laser. We spend 2 minutes to drill a hole. They spend 20 seconds to CAD it and laser cut it. We spend many minutes milling solid, they spend a few burning through sheet. Multiply that by hundreds of parts, and you get the idea.They can do more in less time, and this is why it's done and good. Quite smart. This robot makes me feel like for 9 years I have not been working hard enough (or perhaps not smart enough). Great job 148!
22-02-2010 11:42
Chuck Glick
Paul,
I think everyone is just a little jealous of the 148/217 "ball magnet" skills.
I thought something like this would work but we never got around to prototyping it... boy do I wish we did now.
22-02-2010 11:57
=Martin=Taylor=|
Hey hey, who you callin amateurs?
But seriously, this is why their robot is good. It all comes down to material removal. The secret is in the laser. We spend 2 minutes to drill a hole. They spend 20 seconds to CAD it and laser cut it. We spend many minutes milling solid, they spend a few burning through sheet. Multiply that by hundreds of parts, and you get the idea.They can do more in less time, and this is why it's done and good. Quite smart. This robot makes me feel like for 9 years I have not been working hard enough (or perhaps not smart enough). Great job 148!All I can say is, if this robot ever comes head to head with 254, the match will be one for the books. |
And that’s not for lack of trying! They worked on it every day!
22-02-2010 12:00
Chris Fultz|
I think everyone is just a little jealous of the 148/217 "ball magnet" skills.
|
22-02-2010 12:03
Chuck Glick
|
All I know is I went to Home Depot and the guy there said they did't sell ball magnets. Maybe only the Texas and Michigan stores carry those.
|
22-02-2010 12:05
DmentorI’m progressing well this year through what I think of as the FRC equivalent of the Kübler-Ross model (commonly known as the five stages of grief). I imagine that there are many other folks going through this as well and hopefully we won’t dwell too much more on the negative aspects. Anyways, here’s where I am in my process:
First came “awe”. What an awesome robot! Function AND form nicely wrapped together! Great video! What an awesome TEAM!
Next came “envy”. Wish we could create a robot like that. Wish we had such an established and well-grounded design process. Wish we had access to such a great world-class production facility. Wish I could be part of a team like that.
Followed quickly by “depression”. How can we compete with that? Am I lacking as a mentor since we aren’t capable of creating robots like? Why even try?
Hopefully I’m solidly into the “acceptance” phase now. Regardless of how good any team is, I can still reach out to my team and inspire them in their pursuit of STEM fields. We can still play Breakaway to the best of our abilities. And since FRC is played with alliances of three teams, any robot that can drive can contribute to their alliance’s success. Great strategy can often counterbalance exceptional single robot performance. So how do we win with what we have? Quite frankly we’re happy to have been able to produce a robot at all with all the snow outages…
[tangent] What I particularly like about 148’s design is the potential ability to score 3 in autonomous and 2 in the end game. I envision eliminations to be defensive struggles with limited scoring, so capitalizing on these “guaranteed” points is vital. I’ve long admired 217’s and 1114’s (among others) ability to integrate robot design with overall game strategy to maximize the probability of winning.[tangent]
Eventually I’m sure I’ll move into “inspired”. Particularly when teams like 148 are there to help us by providing white papers, robot design, experience, insight, etc.
22-02-2010 12:12
Tom Bottiglieri|
I think everyone is just a little jealous of the 148/217 "ball magnet" skills.
I thought something like this would work but we never got around to prototyping it... boy do I wish we did now. |
22-02-2010 12:17
Chuck Glick
I totally agree Tom. 148 is one of the few teams that inspires me every year. They truly live by the phrase "design is an iterative process." All teams in FIRST should strive to live by this and 148 is just a prime example.
I just happened to have a major facepalm moment when I saw that roller. Just goes to show, you can never prototype too much.
Man do I wish our magnet worked this well.
22-02-2010 12:29
Jay Trzaskos
If i could spend just one build season with this amazing team as a mentor, I would be a happy happy alumni of the JVN school of innovation, inspiration, and design
22-02-2010 12:30
Karibou
|
All I know is I went to Home Depot and the guy there said they did't sell ball magnets. Maybe only the Texas and Michigan stores carry those.
|
|
Originally Posted by Paul Copioli
I can tell you this: we (148 + 217) created the ball magnet concept using only 9th grade geometry and 11th grade physics (1st semester).
|
22-02-2010 12:37
JVNWe're getting too much credit for the Ball Magnet. The Ball Magnet design is a 100% collaboration between 148 and 217. The Thunderchicken Prototype and Design teams are as good or better than their 148 counter-parts.
Every compliment that is paid to 148 should be echoed 10 times over to our counterparts up north. Years later, I still love the Thunderchickens!
-John
22-02-2010 12:46
Racer26Something tells me we need to fear 148/217 in Atlanta, and 1114 at all of our competitions... not that I wasnt ALREADY expecting that.
22-02-2010 12:58
GaryVoshol
Hey everyone, you don't have to try to beat teams like 148 and 217 (and teams like 67, 1114, 45, etc. - whatever they come up with). All you have to do is be good enough that they want you on their alliance.
You've seen this; now think of what can you do to complement them, not try to oppose them. And give a few compliments along the line too.
22-02-2010 13:00
Aren_Hill
|
Hey everyone, you don't have to try to beat teams like 148 and 217 (and teams like 67, 1114, 45, etc. - whatever they come up with).
|
22-02-2010 13:01
Chris is me|
Hey everyone, you don't have to try to beat teams like 148 and 217 (and teams like 67, 1114, 45, etc. - whatever they come up with). All you have to do is be good enough that they want you on their alliance.
You've seen this; now think of what can you do to complement them, not try to oppose them. And give a few compliments along the line too. |

22-02-2010 13:10
Racer26Agree. If you can't beat them, join them!
This year's tournament structure (with the weird seeding points none of us are used to), could yield a very different outcome than we're all used to.
It means that someone different could end up on top of the standings, and pick one of these powerhouses (148,217,1114,910,67,45,2056,etc) and upset their normal balance (for instance, the 1114/2056 perennial duo).
22-02-2010 14:08
Kims Robot
|
I’m progressing well this year through what I think of as the FRC equivalent of the Kübler-Ross model (commonly known as the five stages of grief). I imagine that there are many other folks going through this as well and hopefully we won’t dwell too much more on the negative aspects.
|
|
Don't cry [even virtual tears!] - everything's relative. 148 maximizes the output they get from the plentiful input resources they have, including human. If the output your team generates relative to your team's available inputs is near the same ratio as theirs, be proud of that achievement, as your results are no less impressive.
|
Use your jealousy as inspiration if you must!
22-02-2010 16:05
nikeairmancurryQuick question Paul.. I was looking at the dates in which 148 and 217 are competing. Does this mean that for 5 straight weeks your going to be right in the middle of inferno of this game?
22-02-2010 16:14
GaryVoshol
|
Quick question Paul.. I was looking at the dates in which 148 and 217 are competing. Does this mean that for 5 straight weeks your going to be right in the middle of inferno of this game?
|
22-02-2010 16:17
galewind
Can anyone from 148 get this up on Google video or put it on your site directly? Youtube is blocked from our school.
22-02-2010 16:48
Racer26Paul has historically joined us Canadians in Wk 4 at Waterloo Regional... I wonder if we're going to see him there paired up with Karthik as our emcees.
22-02-2010 17:47
Coach TomPinching a 9 inch soccer ball at two points within the allowable 2/3 portion is very tricky indeed. Just holding a soccer ball with two tacky parallel cylinders is not easy. We found balancing the "dynamic" forces is very difficult (air pressure in the ball, static and rolling friction, etc.). Although I do not have a PhD in Physics, I am convinced that simple force diagrams will not capture all the variables - especially when the robot is moving. Experimental confirmation is key here.
During our prototyping, we could not find that delicate (favorable) force balance required for an approach like yours. It appears that you found the sweet spot. Congratulations.
-- to all other teams, "there is another". Looking forward the NJ.
-------
|
With regards to the ball magnet, think of it this way:
If the normal force between the ball and the floor is less than the normal force generated between the ball and the "magnets", then the ball will stay possessed by the robot. This doesn't mean the normal force between the ball and the floor is zero. The instance you see in the video near the goal was an implementation issue that has already been resolved. The ball will always be touching the floor when the magnet is on. I can tell you this: we (148 + 217) created the ball magnet concept using only 9th grade geometry and 11th grade physics (1st semester). |
22-02-2010 18:47
Redo91Very nice robot. I am glad I will get to see it at the Dallas Regional.
Seeing that drive train brings back memories from Rack n' Roll.

22-02-2010 21:12
darkangelWow...just, wow...
You just put a good portion of a rookie team into shock and awe. I'm really impressed. A killer robot and a killer drive team, and that hanging mechanism is brilliant. The amount of work and teamwork this took must be astounding. I can't wait to see this in action, either over webcast or if we qualify for and go to Atlanta. Wonder how many teams are already making strategies against you guys. 
22-02-2010 21:41
Paul Copioli|
Quick question Paul.. I was looking at the dates in which 148 and 217 are competing. Does this mean that for 5 straight weeks your going to be right in the middle of inferno of this game?
|
|
Paul has historically joined us Canadians in Wk 4 at Waterloo Regional... I wonder if we're going to see him there paired up with Karthik as our emcees.
|
22-02-2010 21:48
roboticWanderorlooks like some hefty machining went into the arm joint, no doubt donated by the thunder chickens? it looks similar to the hinge on their 2008 robot.
as for the drivetrain, the pnumatics dropping down the middle "strafe wheel" as you pull up your traction wheels gives this robot some fierce adaptability. don't expect to be able to pin 148 anyway similar to lone star 2009.
yet again, the robowranglers seem to make use of almost every motor in the kit, while still maintaining an elegant design. good work.
22-02-2010 21:51
Bochek|
Not this year. I have this little thing called the VEX Robotics Competition that we have in 20 countries all over the world. Week 4 I have to be in New Zealand (yep, the country) for their country's championship. During week 4 this year I will miss my first team 217 match in 11 years. It will be a very somber day for me...
|
22-02-2010 22:05
Jonathan Norris
|
Not this year. I have this little thing called the VEX Robotics Competition that we have in 20 countries all over the world. Week 4 I have to be in New Zealand (yep, the country) for their country's championship. During week 4 this year I will miss my first team 217 match in 11 years. It will be a very somber day for me...
|
23-02-2010 00:19
lyncaGreat work Robowranglers. The DiscoBots are looking forward to playing 148 in Lone Star !
|
as for the drivetrain, the pnumatics dropping down the middle "strafe wheel" as you pull up your traction wheels gives this robot some fierce adaptability. don't expect to be able to pin 148 anyway similar to lone star 2009.
yet again, the robowranglers seem to make use of almost every motor in the kit, while still maintaining an elegant design. good work. |
23-02-2010 00:23
Akash Rastogi|
Great work Robowranglers. The DiscoBots are looking forward to playing 148 in Lone Star !
I'm still a bit confused as what drops down and how. Do you only raise the strafe wheel when going up the ramp ? How do the traction wheels move up and down ? |
23-02-2010 00:36
s_forbes|
If you pause the video, there seems to be a pivot in the center. I'm guessing it all actuates on one joint.
|

23-02-2010 00:42
Akash Rastogi|
Don't cry [even virtual tears!] - everything's relative. 148 maximizes the output they get from the plentiful input resources they have, including human. If the output your team generates relative to your team's available inputs is near the same ratio as theirs, be proud of that achievement, as your results are no less impressive.
Most people in FIRST do (and if they don't, should) look beyond the absolute in determining the merits of a team's success each season. Now on to the business of analyzing this beast, which is, I think, the most aesthetically groovy robot I've seen in my FIRST career (even with the eventual attachment of red/blue bumpers). I can see three sets of black tubing that appear to be tensioned by your arm's probably large tilt system reduction when it tilts back to grab the tower. I also see what I think maybe kinda sorta is two different attachment points near the center of the frame. Definitely one. I presume this tensioning assists the tilt in lifting the robot's max moment up from horizontal. Can you share any clarifications and further details of this particular part of your lift system? Now I'm off to find a CNC sheet metal company in Northeast Ohio. ![]() |
if possible).
23-02-2010 00:43
JaneYoung
|
I will be at FLR with 217 on week 1, Cass Tech with 217 week 2, Dallas with 148 week 3, week 4 off, and week 5 with 148 in Dallas.
|

23-02-2010 00:58
Zack247I hope we see you guys in Atlanta 
23-02-2010 01:31
Duncan MacdonaldNumbering the bottom was a nice touch.
23-02-2010 01:33
santosh
The girl in the back is not wearing safety goggles. not only is this a detriment to her own health but this sets a bad example to the many visitors to chiefdelphi.
Remember, Safety is for squares. Squares made up of the 4 equally important virtues of safety which include: Proper training, PROTECTION, proper attire, and common sense.
Please, nbext time you create a video such as this, please remember to wear your safety goggles. as a mentor of my own team, i often try and make a big deal of this because i have seen the horrors of machine shop accidents gone bad.
Sorry for the rant and good luck the rest of the season!
23-02-2010 02:03
JohnnyWhat is the mechanism that is locking onto the bar? How does it work?
23-02-2010 02:42
Paul CopioliIt is called a gate latch and we took the idea from the 217 1999 robot. Yes, we actually used something from our rookie year.
23-02-2010 02:50
JohnnyThats interesting. So the weight of the robot is holding the whole system in place. Awesome design 217 and 148. Hope we can compete with both of the teams at the championships!
23-02-2010 10:36
thefro526
Now that I've watched this video five or more times, I feel like I can make an educated comment on "Armadillo" and the Team 148/217 (And whatever other teams are in this whole team IFI) Collaboration.
As I saw robots being posted up on CD this year, I kept thinking to myself "None of these robots have the capability to dominate a match". I began to think to myself that there would be no way any single machine could dominate a match this year, similar to lunacy.
Then I saw this video. I realized that Breakaway could be dominated. I also realized a lot of other things, things that I thought I already knew. I noticed that Team 148 (and presumably 217) do substantial amount of prototyping before they even start to design robots. This is where we've failed every year. We look at the game a design a machine from day one and we always are trying to finish as early as possible. I never thought to slow things down and prototype and research and just play around with some concepts. Maybe next year we'll have to take this new approach.
Regardless, Armadillo is surely one hell of a machine.
23-02-2010 11:28
CGuentherJust wanted to say that I saw your video, and your robot looks awesome. I love the kicking and hanging mechanism. Great job!
23-02-2010 12:08
Dmentor|
I noticed that Team 148 (and presumably 217) do substantial amount of prototyping before they even start to design robots. This is where we've failed every year. We look at the game a design a machine from day one and we always are trying to finish as early as possible. I never thought to slow things down and prototype and research and just play around with some concepts. Maybe next year we'll have to take this new approach.
|
23-02-2010 12:24
Kims Robot
|
Team 148 has clearly spent a lot of time tailoring and streamlining their engineering process which enables them to spend more time in the early design steps. My occupational experience (and research in defect analysis) tells me that dedicating more time up front provides the biggest return on their labor investment. In order to generate this time, they have become extremely efficient in modeling, production, integration, and to some extent testing.
|
23-02-2010 12:29
Chris Fultz|
Maybe John or Paul could post a sample schedule that they follow... ![]() |
23-02-2010 12:36
OathKpr95Dear god. Im actually fearing for the well-being of my robots life right now.
Then again I should expect nothing less from the team who made that absolute beast of a robot that we ocasionally had to compete with in last years Dallas regional. I look forward to seeing teh mayhem that your team will cause when we meet again in dallas
.
23-02-2010 14:09
pilum40Whoa....our bot is primitive in comparision. We're concentrating on keeping things simple, running consistently, and being able to move/support our alliance teams this year by good defence, going through the tunnel/over the hump, and making those "garbarge goals" whenever possible. In comparison to y'all's bot...we're looking pretty lame.
See you in Dallas! We're from Summit International Prep-Our bot's name is GAGABot! Hope it doesn't turn into gaga-me-bot! 
23-02-2010 17:00
umangv620so epic. good job 148!!
23-02-2010 17:11
O'Sancheskithat bot is so awesome... i just can't believe how awesome that robot is... it is just amazing
23-02-2010 18:04
VanManThis is great. I'm loving the video. What I fail to understand is how can all of this be done in 6 weeks? Students have school to attend, mentors have jobs to work. The drive base alone looks like it would take a team at least 6 weeks. And they were probably done by at least week 4 so they could debug and practice. I just don't understand how there are enough hours in the day to make a machine that is this amazing. This is truly amazing. You all better do well now that you have such a neat bot.
23-02-2010 19:40
ouellet348calling winner of nationals right now, great job guys, best robot I have seen by far
24-02-2010 01:15
Karibou
|
BINGO... ie DO NOT TRY THIS AT HOME!!! If any regular team spent 3 weeks prototyping, they would be in a world of hurt because their parts would never get finished in time to even build a robot. I know this because in 2006 1511 spent that 3 weeks prototyping, and finally abandoned all prototypes and went with a concept we figured would work, no design, we just built it... fortunately we survived, but we most certainly did NOT come out with an elegant machine, and did not have enough test or programming time. Dmentor hit it on the head, its that they have trained their students and team so well on design, and have great manufacturing support and capability, and THAT allows them to prototype for that long to come up with the best solutions. Until you get to that level of engineering process, in my mind you CANNOT spend 3 weeks prototyping or you will shoot yourself in the foot.
|
24-02-2010 03:37
Arefin Bari
I just checked to see if IFI's website have the kicker in stock...
... they don't. =(
24-02-2010 04:00
sanddrag|
I just checked to see if IFI's website have the kicker in stock...
... they don't. =( |
j/k
24-02-2010 11:27
Lil' Lavery
So I've had a couple days to salvate over this robot/piece of art, but I do have a couple questions.
First off, what's the purpose of the pole that extends beyond the hanging mechanism? Is that to aid with alignment?
Secondly, what prompted you to go with the dropping center omni wheel set-up, instead of just having the four articulating drive pods with mecanum wheels instead of omni (similar to what is shown on pg.4 of this paper)?
The only advantages that's obvious to me of your configuration is it's likely cheaper than buying/manufacturing mecanum wheels and you save some weight and money by using one fewer gearbox (as you can drive both sides of the robot together, but also have to add another one in for the center omni). But otherwise it seems like you're using an additional motor and point of articulation for no real benefit over a similar concept using mecanum wheels.
Also, are you using any sort of closed-loop control to try and account for uneven forces between the forward/reverse (where you have four motors operating) and lateral directions (where you only have one)?
Overall, it's obviously an absolutely gorgeous machine that I certainly hope I get the opportunity to examine at greater detail.
24-02-2010 13:48
Travis Hoffman
|
First off, what's the purpose of the pole that extends beyond the hanging mechanism? Is that to aid with alignment? |
24-02-2010 16:22
JVN|
First off, what's the purpose of the pole that extends beyond the hanging mechanism? Is that to aid with alignment?
|
24-02-2010 16:23
JVN|
Secondly, what prompted you to go with the dropping center omni wheel set-up, instead of just having the four articulating drive pods with mecanum wheels?
|
|
Also, are you using any sort of closed-loop control to try and account for uneven forces between the forward/reverse (where you have four motors operating) and lateral directions (where you only have one)?
|
24-02-2010 16:32
JVNSomeone asked earlier,
When the traction wheels are down, ALL the omni wheels are lifted off the ground. We further lift the center one to allow for traversing the bumps. On the fall prototype, this wheel didn't need to be lifted so it was just spring-loaded downwards.
Curious about how a drivetrain performs with (4X) 2"-wide high traction wheels located on the outer corners in a "narrow body" configuration?
Check out this whitepaper: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1443
You should be able to tell me how it handles...
This was not an accident, but a desired feature of the Nonadrive.
Also note... we have the front and rear pneumatic cylinders on different solenoids. This allows us to independently drop the front/rear traction wheels. We call this "2+2 Mode." When you're in 2+2 mode, the drivetrain turns about a point directly in between the two lowered traction wheels. This allows the driver some cool handling options.
Our primary drive mode is on 5-omnis.
We only use 2+2 Mode and Traction Mode for specialized operations and circumstances.
-John
24-02-2010 17:06
JesseKHmm. I wouldn't have thought of it as a desired effect ... interesting.
24-02-2010 17:21
AdamHeard
|
Someone asked earlier,
When the traction wheels are down, ALL the omni wheels are lifted off the ground. We further lift the center one to allow for traversing the bumps. On the fall prototype, this wheel didn't need to be lifted so it was just spring-loaded downwards. Curious about how a drivetrain performs with (4X) 2"-wide high traction wheels located on the outer corners in a "narrow body" configuration? Check out this whitepaper: http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/papers/1443 You should be able to tell me how it handles... This was not an accident, but a desired feature of the Nonadrive. Also note... we have the front and rear pneumatic cylinders on different solenoids. This allows us to independently drop the front/rear traction wheels. We call this "2+2 Mode." When you're in 2+2 mode, the drivetrain turns about a point directly in between the two lowered traction wheels. This allows the driver some cool handling options. Our primary drive mode is on 5-omnis. We only use 2+2 Mode and Traction Mode for specialized operations and circumstances. -John |
24-02-2010 17:26
JVN|
Do you have any programming that gives you a psuedo-omnidirectional drive when in the 5-wheel setup, or is setup as tank with strafing?
|
) the robot can do with default code. It doesn't take a good driver to arc about a fixed point outside the robot.
24-02-2010 18:01
roboticWanderor|
It cannot translate straight while rotating automatically (if that is what you're asking about...)
Seriously... to get an understanding of how it works, think of playing Halo. Any move you can make (X-Y direction only ) the robot can do with default code. It doesn't take a good driver to arc about a fixed point outside the robot. |
24-02-2010 18:25
Lil' Lavery
|
We refer to the 5-omni setup as something called a "Slide Drive". When you combine a slide drive with 4 drop down traction wheels you get what we're calling "Nonadrive" (not Nano Drive as Mike Copioli seems to think...)
Why do we use a slide drive? Here is the quantitative part: 1. This drive allows for the front and rear wheels to be "linked" without needing a ball differential or anything like that. If one wheel comes off the ground, you still have the full power available on the other wheel. 2. We have 4 motors worth of power pointing forward/backward at all times. With a Mecanum drive, you only get part of this. (The mecanum drive has better side-side power than our 1-CIM, but we don't care. 3. The "slide drive" part of the Nonadrive is 100% intuitive to control, with ZERO programming. This is not meant to discount the efforts of our incredible programmers (148 and 217 have some GREAT ones), but the slide drive can be fully utilized with default code, and its control would be identical to Halo, Call of Duty or any other FPS videogame. Here is the "not so quantitative" part: This will be a controversial statement... In all of my competition robotics experience I have never encountered any drivetrain (swerve, mecanum, or omni) that drives as well as our slide drives. Maybe it has something to do with a lack of programming. Maybe it has something to do with a driver's mental block. I don't know. What I do know is that you put a slide drive in the hands of a good FRC driver, and they'll be almost immediately doing maneuvers that make your head spin. Before you knee-jerk and reply, remember who you're talking to. We understand design tradeoffs. We understand your value propositions may be different than ours. Honestly, I expected more people to ask us "Why the heck did you do THAT instead of just doing a swerve or mecanum drive?" My answer is... "If you built one and drove it, you'd understand." |
|
Nope. The slide wheel is positioned near enough to the CG that she moves sideways almost straight as an arrow. The same can be said for forward and reverse, even without the traction wheels down. No complicated control needed. For testing (before we had any of the other electronics wired up) I took a VEX PIC Microcontroller from inventory, hooked the Victors up and we drove it with default code. Really.
|
).
24-02-2010 18:29
Jamie Kalb|
Also note... we have the front and rear pneumatic cylinders on different solenoids. This allows us to independently drop the front/rear traction wheels. We call this "2+2 Mode." When you're in 2+2 mode, the drivetrain turns about a point directly in between the two lowered traction wheels. This allows the driver some cool handling options.
|

25-02-2010 20:37
R1ffSurf3rIs the top roller the only one that is powered, or does the bottom one spin also?
25-02-2010 20:48
Akash RastogiI find myself watching this video over and over just because I don't know the name of the song.
Anyone know the name?
25-02-2010 22:37
Travis Hoffman
|
I find myself watching this video over and over just because I don't know the name of the song.
Anyone know the name? |
25-02-2010 22:49
Racer26I just love the "death spin". Did I hear JVN or Paul allude to the magnet being able to hold a ball while deathspinning? I'm DYING to see that.
26-02-2010 08:38
SalbertIn 2008, your Tumbleweed robot had me befuddled on how it could possibly win ANY matches at all, and produced a laughing response from our team captain. And it won at the Championship.
This robot has me asking myself how it the world could it NOT win.
Your robot is amazing. I love your drive train. Good luck, not that you'll need it.
26-02-2010 09:04
JaneYoung
|
In 2008, your Tumbleweed robot had me befuddled on how it could possibly win ANY matches at all, and produced a laughing response from our team captain. And it won at the Championship.
|
26-02-2010 09:28
Salbert|
It won because of the amazing ability of 148 to work with their alliance partners in ways that were a combination of dance, art, and tough competitive brilliance, even when Tumbleweed struggled at times. I thought it was visionary. If you ever get a chance to talk to members of 148 about Tumbleweed, do it.
I hope to hear a lot about Armadillo in that same (but different) amazing way. She's got the moves. Jane |
26-02-2010 12:59
drtysteve384Holy #$@%!!! that is insane...nice work like the kicker design...I wish our team thought of that...and i like lifter, that thing is beaslty, what regionals are yall going to by chance?
04-03-2010 17:31
JVNSince Armadillo's twin Mia is competing this weekend and word will probably be out soon anyways, I thought I'd take a minute to discuss a somewhat "controversial" change we made to the robot...
Here is the rough timeline:
Our video was shot on the Saturday before ship, the video itself was edited during the day Sunday and released that Sunday evening... On Monday evening the Robowranglers held an open-house for the Greenville community, then put the robot in the crate late that night (early the next morning).
After the video shoot on Saturday night we (in typical "continuous improvement" fashion) began to discuss what we needed to improve.
We were concerned about the durability of the drivetrain, but didn't have any weight to spare to reinforce it. We were also disappointed at the way the robot traversed the bumps and felt lowering the CG would greatly improve the robots performance.
Early on in our game analysis (day of kickoff) we were trying to do cost-benefit analysis to determine how much those 2-points for hanging would really be worth. At the time we couldn't really tell, because we had no idea how hard it would be to score and had no "easy" way to simulate it. Playing with the actual robot gave us more of an idea of how many balls a match a robot could score.
At the start of our meeting Sunday, we made the decision to remove the hanging mechanism. We would use that weight to reinforce the drivetrain, and lower the CG. By the time the video was posted on Sunday night, the new "baller" Armadillo was up and running. She goes over the bumps smooth as silk forward and backwards, and the drivetrain has been significantly reinforced.
I know some people will question our decision to give up the hanging. I see it as a "no-brainer". When the decision was made, it was like a weight was lifted from my shoulders.
The Thunderchickens went through a similar analysis and made the same decision. Neither robot will be hanging for 2 points this year.
So thank you for all the compliments on our hanging, but you won't ever see Armadillo or Mia do that in competition. Instead you'll see a new-and-improved version of the drivetrain, on a lean, mean, soccer-ball scoring machine.
-John
04-03-2010 17:35
Akash RastogiOur hanger is also the first thing to go when we add our new kicker for Boston.
I was wondering though, could you please still bring the arm with you to Atlanta? I'd love to get a nice look at it.
04-03-2010 17:36
JVN|
Our hanger is also the first thing to go when we add our new kicker for Boston.
I was wondering though, could you please still bring the arm with you to Atlanta? I'd love to get a nice look at it. |
04-03-2010 17:48
Jacob PaikoffThats too bad, I really liked your arm.
And thats leads me to a question I have, how much does your drivetrain weight?
Robot looks great by the way, maybe we'll be in same division 
04-03-2010 17:59
Chris is meIf you're not using your arm, can I borrow it? 
Kudos to 148217 for making a gutsy move that will apparently pay off for them. 
04-03-2010 18:09
sgreco|
I know some people will question our decision to give up the hanging. I see it as a "no-brainer". When the decision was made, it was like a weight was lifted from my shoulders.
|
04-03-2010 18:37
robodude03|
I know some people will question our decision to give up the hanging. I see it as a "no-brainer". When the decision was made, it was like a weight was lifted from my shoulders.
The Thunderchickens went through a similar analysis and made the same decision. Neither robot will be hanging for 2 points this year. So thank you for all the compliments on our hanging, but you won't ever see Armadillo or Mia do that in competition. Instead you'll see a new-and-improved version of the drivetrain, on a lean, mean, soccer-ball scoring machine. -John |
| this is a perfect example of how tradeoffs need to be made, and how design is an iterative process. Every team makes different trade-offs. |
04-03-2010 18:42
Chris is me|
We made that exact same decision in the final week of build. I have to say that I feel much better knowing that other teams felt the same way about hanging, particularly 148 and 217.
|
04-03-2010 19:03
robodude03|
I guess I don't feel their feelings about hanging are at all universal. That's not what I took away from the post, at least. Not "all robots would be sufficiently better with hanging resources moved elsewhere", but "the 148 and 217 robots work >=2 points better without a hanger" (and evidently 399 is the same).
Then again, I could be rationalizing due to the costs sunk into my own team's hanger... |
04-03-2010 21:55
R.C.
John,
We ended up making the same decision, we felt that weight should be put elsewhere. So we improved our roller considerably and our kicker.
Can't wait to see MIA and Armadillo in action.
-RC
06-03-2010 23:04
WJF2011good luck, i wish we could get our parts shopped so beautifully at GM. Sadly though, we are not sponsored by them. Great Robot! I am scared to face the Armadillo.