|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is our robot hanging, although not using the final hooks.
24-02-2010 22:35
Cool tracks! What brand belts/pulleys are those? I'd love to see some closer shots of the drive base, as I always like to see different track implementations.
24-02-2010 23:04
dmlawrence|
Cool tracks! What brand belts/pulleys are those? I'd love to see some closer shots of the drive base, as I always like to see different track implementations.
|
24-02-2010 23:15
Racer26I knew I recognized those Brecoflex belts. We used similar ones on our tracks in 2007/2008. Anybody that saw our drives knew they were cool (transversely mounted CIMs (2, room for 3 because we were allowed 6 one year) inside the loop of the belt itself) 2 bolts and 4 wires, plus the encoder, were all that was required to change a whole unit should one fail.
24-02-2010 23:53
|
Brecoflex TK10-K13 with red linatex backing. I'm afraid we won't have better pictures until the Long Island regional.
There are two lowered center pulleys, giving a total ground contact of about 7" per side. Turning is wonderful. One end is the drive pulley; the other end has a sliding pulley for tension adjustment. |
25-02-2010 00:55
Travis Hoffman
|
Good choice on belts! How did you address the side slipping problem?
|
25-02-2010 02:22
|
Cue Archie and Edith....
The belts have a self-tracking guide - you can see the v-groove in the idler pulley. http://www.brecoflex.com/index.php?CATID=7&SCATID=64 I'd ask for weight and cost, but then, I already know. |
25-02-2010 10:12
Racer261075 had similar problems with snapping belts when side-loading them, we also had big problems with battery life, especially in the later iterations of our drivetrains (for FIRST Overdrive). This, and the fact that our modules were relatively heavy was one of the big reasons we moved away from it, first to a modularized 2 speed shifting 6wdDropCenter, and then in 2009 to our 2+2 swerve, and to our latest Drive train for 2010. This one is unlike anything I've ever seen before.
1625 has their 6 wheel swerve, and 148/217 have their nonadrive, both of which I love. 1075's bringing a new toy to Waterloo, GTR, Championships, KK11 and BE9. I can't wait to see what people will have to say about it.
25-02-2010 14:52
dmlawrenceIn our testing, the side loading problem was not encountered. We geared our motors so that the stall torque was safely less than the belt's breaking force. Once the side load reaches about 150 pounds, the motors have difficulty moving the robot, but the belts still do not break.
In the competition, we'll try to enter only head-on pushing matches.
Dave
25-02-2010 17:06
|
In our testing, the side loading problem was not encountered. We geared our motors so that the stall torque was safely less than the belt's breaking force. Once the side load reaches about 150 pounds, the motors have difficulty moving the robot, but the belts still do not break.
In the competition, we'll try to enter only head-on pushing matches. Dave |
25-02-2010 18:36
dmlawrenceBeveling the belts is an interesting idea. What tool did you use do it? Our shop is not very well-stocked, so we would probably have to use a "belt" sander.
25-02-2010 18:46
|
Beveling the belts is an interesting idea. What tool did you use do it? Our shop is not very well-stocked, so we would probably have to use a "belt" sander.
|
27-02-2010 11:23
dmlawrence|
I believe it was done with an angle grinder, but I'll have to ask the people who did it. I'll post back when I have an answer.
EDIT: Turns out they were custom ordered that way after the first few delammed. |
02-03-2010 01:23
|
We're ordering a set of spare belts from Brecoflex, potentially with the beveled backing. Do you by any chance have a close-up picture of the modified belts?
|