|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is my first attempt at creating a sheet metal drivetrain.
Specification:
8 wheels with 6" VEX Pro wheels
Supershifter
All material is .09" thick Aluminum
Weight: 35 lbs
Since this is my first attempt I am looking for comments and critiques about how I did.
27-04-2010 16:58
Akash RastogiAre there any flanges on those cross members or spacer plates in between the blue drivetrain plates? That can easily add a lot more rigidity.
27-04-2010 17:54
|
Are there any flanges on those cross members or spacer plates in between the blue drivetrain plates? That can easily add a lot more rigidity.
|
27-04-2010 18:18
Mike SchreiberI can't tell but I would like to assume the center 4 are dropped? That' important.
27-04-2010 18:29
Rion Atkinson
|
I can't tell but I would like to assume the center 4 are dropped? That' important.
|
27-04-2010 18:30
apalrd
Assuming this isn't Breakaway-specific (e.g. normal bumper height and no bumps), we have used a sheet metal drivetrain since 2006. In 06 and 07 it had a slight angle to the front to allow it to climb ramps (and 8" IFI wheels, 6wd drop-center), in 2008 it was a flat square, in 09 we had a crab-drive that was still mostly sheet metal, and this year we had a rear chassis pan of sheet metal with a welded skeleton.
The 06-08 one is probably of most interest to you. It's really simple. there are four main pieces that run the length of the frame, each one is aprox. 4-6" tall ( can't remember the exact dimension) and is the length of the frame. They are rectangular. They have a flange on the top and bottom. There are three axle holes in each for a 3/8" chrom-moly pipe, taped for a screw (I don't know the exact size). The two bumpers are the same height as the side pieces, but folded to go around them. There is one chassis divider on the middle of the chassis, going between the two inner sides. There are also two plates in between the outer and inner sides, in between the wheels on the top and bottom. That's it. No lightening holes. The outer plates are designed to be easily removable for maintenance. Each chassis had a different drive (2 fatcim through DeWalt on 06, 4 CIM through DeWalt in 07, 4 CIM through AM Shifter in 08) but that doesn't matter much, it only changes the holes in the inner plates for transmission mounting. I don't know any more specs or weight, but it worked well.
It appears you dropped the middle wheels. That's good. Then it will probably turn. If you don't drop the center wheels or use omnis on the corners, it won't turn. And that would suck.
27-04-2010 18:37
artdutra04
Before you commit to a particular fabrication technology, make sure what you are working on can be manufactured. Not all sheet metal shops have laser/waterjet cutters; some only have a turret/punch machine that create sheet metal parts by stamping out all the holes with punches. When designing parts for these shops, you are limited to much simpler designs (e.g. standard punch sizes or some multiplication thereof). Any complex curves or triangular lightening patterns can be fabricated, but only by nibbling the turret punch. This can make the part, but all your nibbled edges will have scalloping to them.
Get rid of the outer corves edges, and make all the outside edges straight. Then put a flange onto each of these edges. When working with sheet metal, it's all about the flanges.
You'll need to further increase the corner strength; triangular/angled corner gussets is an easy way to accomplish this.
How do you plan to join all these pieces together? Rivets are great in shear, but can only be removed by drilling out the holes. If you need something that may need to be removed, use PEM nuts. On 228, we use tons of PEM nuts (#8-32 and #10-32) to hold almost all of our sheet metal parts together, as you can use countersunk flat head screw on your outer frame perimeter to comply with the ridiculous frame perimeter rules that 1/16" high rivet heads would fail.
27-04-2010 18:43
Rion Atkinson
|
It appears you dropped the middle wheels. That's good. Then it will probably turn. If you don't drop the center wheels or use omnis on the corners, it won't turn. And that would suck.
|
27-04-2010 20:04
Jacob Paikoff|
Are there any flanges on those cross members or spacer plates in between the blue drivetrain plates? That can easily add a lot more rigidity.
|
|
but you might want to take it easy on the cheese holing until your design is structurally sound...
|
|
I can't tell but I would like to assume the center 4 are dropped? That' important.
|
|
How do you plan to join all these pieces together? Rivets are great in shear, but can only be removed by drilling out the holes. If you need something that may need to be removed, use PEM nuts. On 228, we use tons of PEM nuts (#8-32 and #10-32) to hold almost all of our sheet metal parts together, as you can use countersunk flat head screw on your outer frame perimeter to comply with the ridiculous frame perimeter rules that 1/16" high rivet heads would fail.
|
|
Okay, I have to admit; you did a GREAT job with the CAD. How long have you been doing this? IT looks like you are using Inventor though; such a pity.
![]() |
)
27-04-2010 20:39
Akash RastogiI meant there should be flanges perpendicular to the horizontal cross members, not just flanges to mount the crossmembers. Either its the picture and I can't tell you have them, or you misunderstood and should add those. (All the gray parts)
28-04-2010 06:18
Jacob Paikoff|
I meant there should be flanges perpendicular to the horizontal cross members, not just flanges to mount the crossmembers. Either its the picture and I can't tell you have them, or you misunderstood and should add those. (All the gray parts)
|
28-04-2010 22:02
DonRotolo
There is another strengthening method used for sheet metal, and that is beading. Basically you put a 3/8" wide x 1/8" deep (can be larger or smaller) "bump" along the length of a straight member. This adds significant rigidity to the part; however it complicates the flat geometry (what needs to be fabricated/cut when the metal is still flat).
Here is one type; they also make beading dies for presses that are better for beading like you'd need for such a chassis.
Nice CAD work; The 0.090 material would be plenty think. With some creativity, you might be able to go down a gauge or two. One thing to consider is the long unsupported members: These tend to be very weak in compression (they fold) and, unless you are certain they are only in tension, you need to avoid making them a "slender column". This is where flanges and beading and other deformations will help most.
30-04-2010 01:31
jspatz1This looks an awful lot like the 148/217 chassis from this year. You may want to study those.
30-04-2010 11:21
IKEBeautiful cad-work. a couple more pointers. Add in somethig to represent your chain paths. In order to get 0.090 as light as 0.060, you have to remove 30% of the surface area. For a 12" x 12" piece, that would be 61 1" diameter holes. Experiment with Poster board and glue to learn how sections create strength. You can print out your designes and glue this to posterboard. You can then literally cut and paste a scale chassis together. A good example to think about is: A piece of 1x1 box with 1/16" wall is lighter and stronger than a piece of 1x1" U-channel with 1/8" wall. You can do this "test" at Home Depot. Grab a couple pieces and give them a twist (not enough to permanently deform them, but enough to feel how rigid they are). Think about why that is, and how that might apply to your chassis design. Keep up the good work!