|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is the cougar from our 2010 (and future?) shirts that I CADed onto some sheet metal in inventor
08-05-2010 20:00
548swimmerI'm assuming the yellow part is the cut-out?
How thick are those thin parts supporting the center?
If they're too thin, the h2o jet might not cut them accurately enough and you end up with a really sweet outline.
08-05-2010 20:42
jamie_1930It's two pieces of 1/8" sheet metal, the black sheet on the front has the cougar cut out on it, and the yellow is just a solid sheet. The supports for the floating pieces are 1/32". I wasn't really planning on making this into a part, but how thick should they be for a water-jet to cut them? and would you be able to cut smaller with other means?
08-05-2010 20:58
548swimmerIf you have access to a vinyl cutter, that would be the way to go for this. 1/32 seems a bit small, but I'm not really sure. We tend to keep our walls at least 1/4, though for these parts structural integrity is an issue too. As far as other methods, no. Water-jetting will give you the cleaner edge than plasma, and a more reliably straight cut. With plasma, the edges are jagged, and may accidentally cut through a 1/32 wall. I think the wall thickness may be dependent on the precision of your water-jet, so I'd look for those specs if you can find them.
09-05-2010 18:34
sgreco|
If you have access to a vinyl cutter, that would be the way to go for this. 1/32 seems a bit small, but I'm not really sure. We tend to keep our walls at least 1/4, though for these parts structural integrity is an issue too. As far as other methods, no. Water-jetting will give you the cleaner edge than plasma, and a more reliably straight cut. With plasma, the edges are jagged, and may accidentally cut through a 1/32 wall. I think the wall thickness may be dependent on the precision of your water-jet, so I'd look for those specs if you can find them.
|
09-05-2010 18:41
548swimmer|
1/4 inch is overkill. My team used quarter inch side plates this year. We had 4 of them spanning the whole side of the robot and they were 3.5 pounds each after being cut and wouldn't break no mater what you did to them. CAD analysis I've done says 1/8 (if properly mounted and secured) should survive all FIRST type collisions. 1/32 is thin, but if it's just a backing for decoration it's not a problem. My team made our shooter in 09 purely out of 1/32 inch sheetmetal. It was really light and we had no structural problems (it didn't take any impact either though).
|
09-05-2010 18:46
sgreco|
we use 1/8 thick for side plates and such, but for lightening grid patterns the cross supports were 1/4 wide. The issues here is trying to cut out two shapes in sheet metal with 1/32 between them, not cutting 1/32 thick metal.
|
09-05-2010 18:51
548swimmer|
I see, I misread, but even so, it depends on the machine whether it breaks or not and whether it is used properly. A typical waterjet should have a tolerance to cut much thinner than a 1/32 inch divide.
It's going to depend on where the impact is taken, where the pressure points are, and where the cuts are in relation to that. Until we know that I wouldn't say that it's safe to assume a certain thickness is too thin. |
09-05-2010 19:11
sgreco
09-05-2010 19:13
548swimmer|
It is good to stay safe on thickness. I just figured it won't matter so much on a decoration so long as the machine can cut it.
|
09-05-2010 19:18
jamie_1930Just to reitterate real quick is the whole piece is two 12" x 12" sheets of 1/8" thick aluminum, and the supports that are holding the floating pieces, like the swirl on the cougars cheek, on the front plate are 1/32" wide channels. My opinion is that these are completely structural sound for their purpose, keep in mind that if we ever use this it would be for decoration and kept out of the areas that will be frequented by collisions.
Out of curiosity how much would you guys estimate it would cost to get this cut?
09-05-2010 19:29
548swimmer|
Just to reitterate real quick is the whole piece is two 12" x 12" sheets of 1/8" thick aluminum, and the supports that are holding the floating pieces, like the swirl on the cougars cheek, on the front plate are 1/32" wide channels. My opinion is that these are completely structural sound for their purpose, keep in mind that if we ever use this it would be for decoration and kept out of the areas that will be frequented by collisions.
Out of curiosity how much would you guys estimate it would cost to get this cut? |