|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is a Chassis design that I came up with in about 4 hours work. I was inspired by 254 and 968. Kind similar, but this chassis can be used in many years to come. Wheels are 4" AM Performance wheels, an AM Supershifter, and a top speed at about 17 feet per second. More details to come. BTW, this was my first chassis design ever so don't hate on me. Suggestions are welcomed.
18-05-2010 21:30
sdcantrell56Very nice for a first design although there are a lot of things that I dont see included.
How are you planning on transferring power between the wheels and transmission, and what type of shaft do the wheels ride on? I dont see any bearings or bearing blocks if you are planning a live axle system like 254 uses
18-05-2010 21:58
rahilmWe used 254's drive system in 2009 (Lunacy) and one of the best things about it was the chain tensioning system; it was really cool, and made chain tensioning a breeze. I would suggest looking into that and incorporating.
18-05-2010 23:03
548swimmerYou'll need some supports along the bottom in case you get hit from the side.
Obligatory weight question.
Any reason the flat platform is so far from the ground? The elevated CG could make your robot extremely unstable.
Great job for a first drivetrain! It's nice to see people spreading their wings and getting into CAD!
18-05-2010 23:16
Jamie KalbWhy not direct drive one of the center wheels? This is what 254/968 do. It'd save you a run of chain, and make a lot of sense if you're planning on running live axles.
18-05-2010 23:27
apalrd
As for chain tension, I've never looked at the 254 design close up (I did watch it beat us in the finals in Archimedes this year). The simplest way is to have a screw and pull the axle further from the gearbox or other chain end, to increase the center-center distance and tighten the chain. I assume thats what 254 does.
I don't see any live axle bearings on the inside that I can see. Did you leave these out?
Is the chain inside or outside of the extrusion? It would probably be more maintainable outside.
Also - Having that shelf makes minor difference for CG. With the exception of bump cross-ability, it would be fairly low in any other game.
AND - You shouldn't need a perimeter unless you have bumpers. No real reason to prevent collisions at this level, it should be robust enough to handle it. Just from observing other teams, I can't prove this.
And another recommendation - If you got your crio model online, I suggest you open it and remove excess crap. The cRio model I have includes all of the 15pin connectors for the modules, caps on some, a circuit board inside, case screws, connectors, etc. that are not important. This is especially important if you are like me and don't have a great graphics card, this adds tremendously to lag.
I like the SuperShifters, but while you've got that live axle why not drive a wheel with the live axle?
On the live axles - You are probably going to use a hex live axle for your wheels. That is how most "West-coast" drives are driven.
19-05-2010 00:57
NickE|
As for chain tension, I've never looked at the 254 design close up (I did watch it beat us in the finals in Archimedes this year). The simplest way is to have a screw and pull the axle further from the gearbox or other chain end, to increase the center-center distance and tighten the chain. I assume thats what 254 does.
|
19-05-2010 06:53
O'Sancheski|
How are you planning on transferring power between the wheels and transmission, and what type of shaft do the wheels ride on? I dont see any bearings or bearing blocks if you are planning a live axle system like 254 uses
|
|
You'll need some supports along the bottom in case you get hit from the side.
Obligatory weight question. Any reason the flat platform is so far from the ground? The elevated CG could make your robot extremely unstable. It's not. Great job for a first drivetrain! It's nice to see people spreading their wings and getting into CAD! |
19-05-2010 10:37
Rion Atkinson
|
I haven't done the drivetrain yet. This was just something that I whipped up in CAD very quickly. I was going to do chain to one wheel and then off that wheel to the rest.
I do, there is one in the back and the platform on the bottom is about 1/4" thick. It is just how the screenshot was taken. The platform is about an inch off the ground. |
19-05-2010 17:35
548swimmer|
I do, there is one in the back and the platform on the bottom is about 1/4" thick. It is just how the screenshot was taken. The platform is about an inch off the ground.
|
19-05-2010 17:46
Rion Atkinson
|
Sorry for the confusion. I was referencing the entirely flat surface where a manipulator would mount.
|
19-05-2010 18:30
548swimmer|
I would think that this is there only so that it shows you can do stuff with it. There is no point putting stuff on it because you have no idea what it you be. But an open box looks stupid. So he put some plexiglass there to make it look spiffy.
![]() |
19-05-2010 20:40
O'Sancheski|
I would think that this is there only so that it shows you can do stuff with it. There is no point putting stuff on it because you have no idea what it you be. But an open box looks stupid. So he put some plexiglass there to make it look spiffy.
![]() |
19-05-2010 22:50
Rion Atkinson
OKay..... So I honestly just noticed this... Would you mind explaining why your CRio is solid gold? 
19-05-2010 23:15
Jamie Kalb
19-05-2010 23:34
Rion Atkinson
|
Rion,
All the gangstas in FRC have solid gold CRios. It's called "blingage". If you don't have a solid gold CRio, you're not a straight-up G. |
20-05-2010 09:30
JamesCH95|
Also, you will want a support going across the middle on the front side of the chassis as well, You definitely don't want to turn the electronics board into a main support structure, if that were to snap... So yeah, just throw in an extra support across the bottom.
|
20-05-2010 11:13
Rion Atkinson
|
I have never seen, nor heard of, a robot chassis breaking in half. FIRST chassis are generally very overbuilt, especially with pool noddle bumpers. 95 has mounted electronics on structural members for a long, long time and never had a problem.
Extra bracing isn't a bad idea on the more open end of the frame though. |
20-05-2010 14:47
O'Sancheski|
OKay..... So I honestly just noticed this... Would you mind explaining why your CRio is solid gold?
![]() |
20-05-2010 21:43
Mike SchreiberThere is no way of saying this chassis can be used in many years to come. We don't know the game. It probably won't be very useful in the water game.
I'm also curious how you arrived at the 17 fps number if you "haven't done the drive train yet"
What gearing are you using in the super shifters?
22-05-2010 09:20
O'Sancheski|
There is no way of saying this chassis can be used in many years to come. We don't know the game. It probably won't be very useful in the water game.
I'm also curious how you arrived at the 17 fps number if you "haven't done the drive train yet" What gearing are you using in the super shifters? |
24-05-2010 15:02
Rion Atkinson
|
I'm also curious how you arrived at the 17 fps number if you "haven't done the drive train yet"
What gearing are you using in the super shifters? |
24-05-2010 15:12
Andrew Schreiber|
It's possible to know how fast something will go without "doing the drive train". If you know how fast the output shaft on the gearbox goes, and the diameter of your wheels you will be using. By then finding the circumference and then with some more math you can find the Fps.
|
24-05-2010 18:36
Mike Schreiber|
It's possible to know how fast something will go without "doing the drive train". If you know how fast the output shaft on the gearbox goes, and the diameter of your wheels you will be using. By then finding the circumference and then with some more math you can find the Fps.
|
You cheated by posting at work! I actually have to do stuff at my job...
24-05-2010 20:10
Rion Atkinson
24-05-2010 22:20
Mike SchreiberWho said anything about a CAD person. The thread title is "Design Idea". Designing is more than a pretty picture, you need data to back it up...then you can be pretty.
23-08-2010 12:55
RookieWookiez|
I haven't either, that's why things are so over built. I was just stating a worst case scenario. Now... I did see the entire top of a push bot cave in at the Oklahoma Regional in 09...
|