|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team captain Zach in a recruiting demo.
14-06-2010 19:47
Rion Atkinson
That's awesome. You should put a chair and seat belt on there.
Perhaps a little safer?
Still... I love the idea. Did it help?
14-06-2010 19:58
Bjenks548|
That's awesome. You should put a chair and seat belt on there.
Perhaps a little safer? Still... I love the idea. Did it help? |
14-06-2010 20:09
gorrillaThat is unsafe. No safety glasses and you're riding on the robot?
Not to mention the possibility of a chain grabbing and pinching various body parts
14-06-2010 21:01
Alex Cormier
|
That is unsafe. No safety glasses and you're riding on the robot?
Not to mention the possibility of a chain grabbing and pinching various body parts |
14-06-2010 22:03
Yes, safety glasses are important! They will definitely do a great deal when your cranium possibly impacts the floor at a decent velocity, or when the robot bucks you into a wall!
It's the act that is unsafe, not the lack of (nearly useless in this situation) equipment.
14-06-2010 22:57
Edoc'silLighten up safety addicts, your like the plague. Honestly, the best way to teach someone how to swing a hammer is to let him smack his thumbs a few times... It is unlikely that someone will retain permanent damage from ridding their bot, and they could learn a few valuable lessons on the teachings of Darwin and Newton....
14-06-2010 23:05
gorrilla|
Lighten up safety addicts, your like the plague. Honestly, the best way to teach someone how to swing a hammer is to let him smack his thumbs a few times... It is unlikely that someone will retain permanent damage from ridding their bot, and they could learn a few valuable lessons on the teachings of Darwin and Newton....
|
14-06-2010 23:07
Edoc'sil|
That statement scares me, there is absolutely no reason for someone to get hurt when it could have been prevented. Regardless of the lesson they would learn.
|
14-06-2010 23:11
gorrilla|
Honestly, I heal now, I won't heal so well when I am old. Better to make my mistakes now, no?
|
14-06-2010 23:12
,4lex S.Better to make mistakes never actually.
To be fair though, doing this kind of thing is pretty common practice, and as long as everyone is relatively careful, mostly safe. This was the only way my team had of testing on the Regolith with close to full weight in 2009. When done with a little forethought, it isn't terrible (Chain guards are important, and so is electrical isolation). Do remember to consider and eliminate hazards before you do this kind of thing though. And if it seems kinda sketchy, just don't.
14-06-2010 23:12
Alex Cormier
|
Honestly, I heal now, I won't heal so well when I am old. Better to make my mistakes now, no?
|
14-06-2010 23:24
Edoc'sil|
How many fingers should a punch press worker loose before they learn to use the machine properly?
|
14-06-2010 23:26
Chris is me|
That is different, a punch removes a finger far more easily then a decently shielded DT
|
14-06-2010 23:39
Basel A
The point is not that probably, nothing will happen, or that it's mainly safe. It's not that in youth injuries will heal, or that robots are more safe than machines. It's the point that this was a situation that was LESS SAFE than it COULD be. I'm no advocate of blast shields on FRC fields, but at least make an effort. It's easier to learn from someone who lost a finger than to lose a finger yourself. In consideration of that, it may have been better to wear safety glasses, add a seat, ensure electrical isolation (probably done already), or simply use dumbbells or other athletic weights.
Again, it all comes down to the fact that you know it could and should be safer, but aren't making it any safer. Easier to learn from another person's experience than your own.
14-06-2010 23:50
Edoc'silEhh, I think your a bunch of pansies, you think I am an idiot. Guess I really don't care, I am done with the whole first thing anyways.
14-06-2010 23:56
Alan Anderson
15-06-2010 00:35
Andrew Schreiber|
Lighten up safety addicts, your like the plague. Honestly, the best way to teach someone how to swing a hammer is to let him smack his thumbs a few times... It is unlikely that someone will retain permanent damage from ridding their bot, and they could learn a few valuable lessons on the teachings of Darwin and Newton....
|
15-06-2010 00:36
JamJam263While it is a good looking picture, I have to agree with they safety concerns.
15-06-2010 01:08
EricH
A smart person learns from his own mistakes. A genius learns from everyone else's mistakes in addition to his own.
Something about nobody ever living long enough to make all the mistakes themselves...
Yes, the drivetrain is apparently shielded. Yes, he does seem to have a good grip on the robot. However, if that robot moves, I would expect anybody riding it to a) not be riding it or b) be wearing appropriate safety gear (helmet, safety glasses, possibly gloves) and c) have extra handles attached for extra grab by a rider. Oh, and a very easy-to-get-to main breaker and E-stop in case something does go wrong.
The other thing is this little thing called insurance. If somebody got hurt doing something like this, insurance companies would make a big deal. Then, there goes the team due to a chain of events. I know at my workplace (a go-kart track), every track worker wears a helmet and ankle-high work boots (and most of us wear steel-toe work boots) due to insurance 'requests" (low ceilings and karts that could hit you if you can't jump fast enough are apparently dangerous). Not to mention the height requirements, which are strict because of insurance.
I think I made myself clear in that: safety is not unimportant.
15-06-2010 01:31
jason701802Although your concerns about insurance companies are legitimate, his chance of being injured is far lower than his chance of getting in a serious car wreck on his way to school that morning. As long as the driver is being careful, not going very fast or accelerating quickly, his danger of being injured in negligible.
Considering his position of the robot, there is no feasible way that any of his limbs could get caught in any moving parts.
P.S. why don't some of you go harp on the people making PVC t-shirt cannons? they are immeasurably more dangerous than this.
15-06-2010 01:41
Steven SigleyDid someone say robot chair?
Meet the SigWay.
A chairbot I built that was named after me. Got to ride it around a few times a week or two before graduating and then just a little after as you can tell by this picture. I think it's my coolest achievement because a lot of the work done on it was by me and an underclassmen, Josie Murphy.
http://www.vandenrobotics.com/plogge...icture&id=3255
15-06-2010 07:20
fireyoshiI was the driver. I always made sure his hands were away from the chain, made sure we had constant communication, and made sure the e-stop was close by. This was done in front of a college-styled classroom (tiered seats and desks) so we had about 25 feet of room. The robot was also tethered with a shorter than usual ethernet, so we didn't have a lot of leeway to drive. All I did was drive forward 10 ft at about 1-3 fps. Stop. Drive backwards at the same rate. Stop. Repeat about 3 times. We didn't go down the hall at full speed or crash into the walls or anything to that vein. Skateboarding, bicycle riding, and four wheeling (all three very popular in my area) are way more dangerous than what we did. If anyone else has any more questions please ask away.
15-06-2010 09:14
Ryan Dognaux
|
Honestly, I heal now, I won't heal so well when I am old. Better to make my mistakes now, no?
|
15-06-2010 10:24
JesseKTalking safety to a teenage goofball or adrenaline junky of any age is correlative to talking about Wine to Isaac Newton while he was sitting under the apple tree: the underlying concept is there but it is much less valued than that which interests them.
We need an emoticon for the expression "beating a dead horse".
15-06-2010 15:22
EricH
|
P.S. why don't some of you go harp on the people making PVC t-shirt cannons? they are immeasurably more dangerous than this.
|
15-06-2010 15:32
Andrew Schreiber|
Although your concerns about insurance companies are legitimate, his chance of being injured is far lower than his chance of getting in a serious car wreck on his way to school that morning. As long as the driver is being careful, not going very fast or accelerating quickly, his danger of being injured in negligible.
Considering his position of the robot, there is no feasible way that any of his limbs could get caught in any moving parts. P.S. why don't some of you go harp on the people making PVC t-shirt cannons? they are immeasurably more dangerous than this. |
15-06-2010 19:11
iblis432Do I think this was unsafe? Yes. Do i ask everyone here not to drive their car because a drunk driver might be on the road tonight? no. Could the drink i be drinking right now be spiked with poison? Possibly. There's always a risk, this carried a greater one then others. But I fail to see the significance in telling him he was stupid when we should be happy he's ok. There have been stupider things done in robotics than this (for anyone on my team reading this, LIKE PUTTING A BATTERY WITH FRAYED WIRES ON THE ROBOT) Personally, I think it looks like fun, and judging by the picture and what he said, I'd say at this time he wasn't some freshman riding the robot, but a senior or a graduate that knew the risks. He seems to recognize the robot's center of gravity quite well, so i for one applaud him on taking many of the nesacarry saftey measures.
15-06-2010 22:36
pacoliketacoI think everyone here is focusing on the wrong thing. this is not built for safety, obviously. have you not ever ridden your robots? my favorite thing to do is strap a chair(2x4 or other kind of wooden plank) to the top of a robot, and drive it around the school. or have other people drive me around on it. can't you just let this kid have some fun? this was posted to show what some kid thought would be fun, and thus i would agree. i dont see why this is even an argument, other than just people saying how much fun this is to do. haha
16-06-2010 01:38
Chris is me|
I think everyone here is focusing on the wrong thing. this is not built for safety, obviously. have you not ever ridden your robots? my favorite thing to do is strap a chair(2x4 or other kind of wooden plank) to the top of a robot, and drive it around the school. or have other people drive me around on it. can't you just let this kid have some fun? this was posted to show what some kid thought would be fun, and thus i would agree. i dont see why this is even an argument, other than just people saying how much fun this is to do. haha
|
16-06-2010 10:43
iblis432|
Overarching talk of safety annoys me as much as anyone, but when you're holding onto a robot with just your hands, gripping within a few inches of moving roller chain, I wouldn't compare that to a rigidly mounted chair driven by a carefully watched, responsible driver at low speeds.
|
16-06-2010 11:10
Alan Anderson
|
In all honesty, all this video makes me think is next robotics meeting im strapping a chair to ours and im gonna have some fun.
![]() |
16-06-2010 15:28
iblis432|
Do everyone a favor and strap a stylish bicycle helmet to the rider's head as well. You'll avoid two things: potential head trauma from accidental collisions or falls, and guaranteed nagging from safety zealots.
|
16-06-2010 20:09
M.WongOne of our mentors in the past used to joke with us saying "if you guys ever get three medals at one competition, you can put a seat on the robot."
16-06-2010 21:29
pacoliketaco|
One of our mentors in the past used to joke with us saying "if you guys ever get three medals at one competition, you can put a seat on the robot."
|
22-06-2010 16:44
M.Wong|
well i dont know for sure, but i think every team gets 25 participation medals...haha jk.
|
22-06-2010 21:17
Tom LineLet me ask a few very serious questions.
Is your few minutes of fun worth the school and team liability that would result if something were to happen? You're risking getting your team shutdown, thrown out of the school, or sued. Or perhaps the result could be permanently maiming someone. Can you, PERSONALLY, step up and say you'll pull out your wallet to pay for all the liability and the potential medical bills if something were to happen? The rise in insurance? Finding a new place for your team to meet?
This is as much about personal responsibility as it is about safety. Those who are blowing it off are showing a remarkable lack of both.
To the driver who posted: it's good to hear that you were thinking about safety. I don't think many of these posts are directed at you so much as the people who simply want to ignore the possible consequences all-together.
23-06-2010 09:09
iblis432You risk sudden death each time you get into your car. You risk your house exploding each time you turn on the oven. You even risk your life when flushing the toilet. Too many things have negatives you can stare at for hours, but instead you should be looking at statistics. Cars for example, yes car crash constantly. But there are still more cars in the world then there are wrecked ones.
23-06-2010 16:01
Chris is me|
You risk sudden death each time you get into your car. You risk your house exploding each time you turn on the oven. You even risk your life when flushing the toilet. Too many things have negatives you can stare at for hours, but instead you should be looking at statistics. Cars for example, yes car crash constantly. But there are still more cars in the world then there are wrecked ones.
|
23-06-2010 16:58
JesseK|
So because everything else has risk means you should take stupid ones?
|
24-06-2010 01:17
EricH
It's only a stupid risk if you don't adequately prepare: helmet, life vest, make sure the boat doesn't have any holes, extra paddles, float plan, all that good stuff. In a car, wear your seat belt and drive defensively. These things mitigate the risk to manageable (i.e., if something does go wrong, it is not necessarily your fault).
Mitigating factors were not present in the photo--even a set of bolt-on handles would help, as they'd provide a more secure (and safe, most likely) grasping area, or a helmet for the case of a sudden stop without preparation.
When the Mythbusters do something with the "do NOT repeat NOT try this at home" message, you'll notice that they're always a) wearing protective gear or b) hunkering in a bunker or c) very, very far away or d) not being in the "line of fire" themselves or e) some combination of the preceding. This does not eliminate the risk that something goes horribly wrong. However, it reduces the damage when and if it does, and ensures that nobody gets hurt.
25-06-2010 22:21
jason701802|
It's only a stupid risk if you don't adequately prepare: helmet, life vest, make sure the boat doesn't have any holes, extra paddles, float plan, all that good stuff.
|
26-06-2010 01:40
Chris is me|
The life jacket and helmet are for if you fall out of the boat at some other time than the rapids, if you fall out during a class V or VI, a life jacket and helmet are not going to do much of anything
|
26-06-2010 01:45
EricH
|
The life jacket and helmet are for if you fall out of the boat at some other time than the rapids, if you fall out during a class V or VI, a life jacket and helmet are not going to do much of anything
|
29-10-2010 17:53
sithmonkey13What was it Darwin said? Something about survival of the fittest by nature killing the stupid ones? The point is, the person on the robot knows the risk, and was going to try it anyway. Safety is important, but sometimes you just have to try something. You could have the safest robot around, but just from everything on the robot, there still is a risk to doing anything. Those who don't understand the risk and ignore safety are the recipients of the Darwin awards, but those who do understand the risk take precautions. Anyway we just see the guy on the robot, not anything else. For all we know, the guy could be photoshopped on or have a paramedics standing by in case something does happen.