|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Haven't seen much CAD up on CD so I figured I'd put something up.
This is Rev 2 of our 2 speed shifter we used during the 2010 Season. I'll put up some more specs when I can find the model.
Current Specs:
-2 Stage Reduction
-2 Cims and 1 FP (Optional)
-16 FPS and 7.5 FPS
-6 Inch Wheel
-Initial: 12:50
-Shfiter: 28:48 & 16:60
19-09-2010 17:44
gallo26You know RC... I'm not surprised by this
Your CAD always looks amazing! Your work is very impressive! Very clean and elegant!
19-09-2010 18:13
Chris is meNice model / gearbox!
How often did you guys play at 16FPS? When looking into drive boxes this year, I was looking at the 6 motor setup, but it seemed that adding 6 motors let you run at ~9.5 FPS while pretty close to traction limited. Was the high gear useful for your team, or just something nice to have?
Also, can I have two? 
20-09-2010 02:58
R.C.
|
Nice model / gearbox!
How often did you guys play at 16FPS? When looking into drive boxes this year, I was looking at the 6 motor setup, but it seemed that adding 6 motors let you run at ~9.5 FPS while pretty close to traction limited. Was the high gear useful for your team, or just something nice to have? Also, can I have two? ![]() |
21-09-2010 09:57
topgunHow do you do the shifting? Pneumatics, servo motor, or some other means? Did you cut the gears or use off the shelf gears?
Looks nice.
- T
21-09-2010 10:59
R.C.
|
How do you do the shifting? Pneumatics, servo motor, or some other means? Did you cut the gears or use off the shelf gears?
Looks nice. - T |
24-09-2010 01:25
steelerbornDude looks sick!
I am learning SolidWorks at school now, Its a really nice program.
25-09-2010 00:36
sanddragCan you get rid of any of the standoffs in there to simplify it a bit, and reduce the parts count?
25-09-2010 15:30
mplanchardHi RC
Thank you for sharing. You have been busy. If you did this with SolidWorks Photoview 360 you really should put this image up on www.solidworksgallery.com. Very nice work. Marie
25-09-2010 16:20
Chris is meOne more question: Why two 1/4 plates and not 1/8 plates with bearing shims? I haven't made many gearboxes or anything, so I'm trying to look into the advantages of one over the other.
28-09-2010 19:36
J93Wagner@Chris - If I had to take a guess as to why there are no flanges, I would say it has something to do with DFMA as not every team has easy access to bending parts accurately (we certainly don't), or ease of access and assembly.
Also, what exactly is the plate thickness? I need to know for a project I'm working on. Nice gearbox btw.
29-09-2010 02:15
R.C.
|
Can you get rid of any of the standoffs in there to simplify it a bit, and reduce the parts count?
|
|
Hi RC
Thank you for sharing. You have been busy. If you did this with SolidWorks Photoview 360 you really should put this image up on www.solidworksgallery.com. Very nice work. Marie |
|
One more question: Why two 1/4 plates and not 1/8 plates with bearing shims? I haven't made many gearboxes or anything, so I'm trying to look into the advantages of one over the other.
|
|
@Chris - If I had to take a guess as to why there are no flanges, I would say it has something to do with DFMA as not every team has easy access to bending parts accurately (we certainly don't), or ease of access and assembly.
Also, what exactly is the plate thickness? I need to know for a project I'm working on. Nice gearbox btw. |