|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Hey everyone,
After experimenting with inventor for a few months now I felt as if I needed to see if my work was up to par.
This design is a 4wd, geared WCD with 8" wheels and a rectangle tubing frame. I in no way designed this drawing, I merely modified a pretty well accepted WCD design, baseplate and all.
Other specs:
2x1 tubing
8in wheels
14 gears
Wheels and gears were designed to be held in with C-clips
Center 4 wheels dropped 1/8"
Inventor says the system weighs 56 lbs. So probably not a realistic DT.
And comments or critiques are welcomed! That was the purpose of creating this.
04-01-2011 12:24
Andrew Schreiberhttp://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/26312 A couple years ago 703 did a 14 wheel system. I don't think they ever said a weight for it though. I know the upper structure of that machine was sparse and had to use a decent amount of fancy materials.
You are probably familiar with another no-chain-gang, 25. They use a similar approach to you and use larger wheels.
As for cutting weight, what thickness is the wall on that tubing? Going from 1/8" to 1/16" wall cuts the weight in half. You could also probably be more aggressive on your lightening of the gears. Steel is quite dense after all. (This applies to inside your shifters too) And don't forget, sometimes having a lot of weight down low is a good thing.
04-01-2011 12:34
JesseKThis setup makes it somewhat difficult to attach bumpers outside of the wheels, particularly with 8" wheels and bumpers that have a very specific 'zone' of placement. The Poofs get away with this by mounting their chain on the inside of the wheel rails, allowing them to mount metal brackets to reach the outside for bumpers -- is it possible to do the same with the gears?
I'm also not sure that the setup would weigh 56 lbs; if it's an issue you may want to double check it, or investigate using other materials for gears (or thinner gears).
04-01-2011 15:12
Chris is meOne of the big ways to save weight, and what 25 does, is to take advantage of the massive idler gears to provide a massive speed reduction. If you put a tiny pinion on your CIM output and use the same giant gears for your wheels, that's a large reduction you no longer need to do inside your gearbox.
04-01-2011 21:29
Cyberphil
Thank you very much guys!
|
You are probably familiar with another no-chain-gang, 25. They use a similar approach to you and use larger wheels. As for cutting weight, what thickness is the wall on that tubing? Going from 1/8" to 1/16" wall cuts the weight in half. You could also probably be more aggressive on your lightening of the gears. Steel is quite dense after all. (This applies to inside your shifters too) And don't forget, sometimes having a lot of weight down low is a good thing. |
| This setup makes it somewhat difficult to attach bumpers outside of the wheels, particularly with 8" wheels and bumpers that have a very specific 'zone' of placement. The Poofs get away with this by mounting their chain on the inside of the wheel rails, allowing them to mount metal brackets to reach the outside for bumpers -- is it possible to do the same with the gears? |
| I'm also not sure that the setup would weigh 56 lbs; if it's an issue you may want to double check it, or investigate using other materials for gears (or thinner gears). |
| One of the big ways to save weight, and what 25 does, is to take advantage of the massive idler gears to provide a massive speed reduction. If you put a tiny pinion on your CIM output and use the same giant gears for your wheels, that's a large reduction you no longer need to do inside your gearbox. |
21-06-2011 00:43
msimon785
It's also possible that Inventor is giving you a weight for solid Alu CIMs. Try unenabling any COTS or premade parts, and letting it give you a weight for only the drive base. Then add in everything else. I've found that with that method, Inventor is never more than 1/8th of a lb off, even for our robot this year. Good Luck!
21-06-2011 08:19
Jared Russell
Looks good. Need to put some titanium on there, though
Just to nitpick, most people would call this an 8WD
How are you planning on keeping the gears/wheels on there? You would probably want to extend shaft all the way through the 2x1 tubing in order to provide two points of support.
21-06-2011 08:45
jwfossLooks like an interesting concept. A Few Suggestions to look into, many said by other people already:
- move the gears to the inside of the frame
- utilize the reduction provided by using those large gears, this may involve looking into using the standard Andymark shifting gearset with a custom final gear ratio.
- have the electronics/base plate one piece, with cutouts for the trans
- Add Bumper Mounts, check front clearence for bumpers, it looks like the wheels are infront of the chassis' leading edge.
- consider alternate wheel sizes and types, there are many options out there (I'm currently in the colsons are great line of thought)
Keep up the good work!
21-06-2011 18:40
Cyberphil
|
It's also possible that Inventor is giving you a weight for solid Alu CIMs. Try unenabling any COTS or premade parts, and letting it give you a weight for only the drive base. Then add in everything else. I've found that with that method, Inventor is never more than 1/8th of a lb off, even for our robot this year. Good Luck!
|
|
Looks good. Need to put some titanium on there, though
Just to nitpick, most people would call this an 8WD How are you planning on keeping the gears/wheels on there? You would probably want to extend shaft all the way through the 2x1 tubing in order to provide two points of support. |
|
Looks like an interesting concept. A Few Suggestions to look into, many said by other people already:
- move the gears to the inside of the frame - utilize the reduction provided by using those large gears, this may involve looking into using the standard Andymark shifting gearset with a custom final gear ratio. - have the electronics/base plate one piece, with cutouts for the trans - Add Bumper Mounts, check front clearence for bumpers, it looks like the wheels are infront of the chassis' leading edge. - consider alternate wheel sizes and types, there are many options out there (I'm currently in the colsons are great line of thought) Keep up the good work! |