|
|
|
 610 is an all boys school, and we were surprised to see our pit and robot neatly decorated with hot pink boas and flowers upon arrival this morning. - Mr. Lim [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
By: Chris is me
New: 20-01-2011 14:05
Updated: 20-01-2011 14:05
Views: 1733 times
Here's our chassis ready to be sent off and welded. All 1/8" wall tubing - 3x1 on the sides and 1x1 and 2x1 inside. Bumper mounts every few inches to comply with bumper rules (thanks GDC for the easy rules this year). Access windows on top to change internal belt drive - AL plate will be riveted on as reinforcement when not under repair.
In the words of Tom Heller, this chassis is sexy.
Discussion
view entire thread
20-01-2011 15:00
ttakashima
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Looks good! How heavy is the frame?
20-01-2011 15:28
thefro526
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Looks awesome.
I'm curious about weight as well.
20-01-2011 18:11
Chris is me
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Weight: Honestly have no idea. I didn't do the chassis CAD and when I got a brief look at it today the material properties weren't set. The chassis parts are out of shop now but the second they get back I'll weigh them. It won't be the lightest thing in the world, but we prefer weight down low - with a 9 foot high arm having such a low CG will be immensely helpful.
The wheels are 4" diameter. Gotta love a flat field, right?
The belts are internal for a few reasons. First, internal belt loops are cleaner and less in the way; the less space we take up in the center, the more room we have for things like electronics and our minibot deployment system. Second, they are less "open" so field debris cannot possibly get tangled with them.
As for the drawbacks to internal belts, we saw them and minimized them. Maintenance was a big worry for me, but I'm now convinced it'll be not a problem. We tested these belts rigorously. Rapid speed changes, stalling the motors, mixes of both, and the belts did not skip or strip even once. Also, tensioning is not much of a problem. We have some fairly basic idlers in there for tension and it's a very much "set it and forget it" thing - once you get the belts right you never need to touch them again. Just in case, we did a timed run for a full belt change and it took about 7 minutes. We weren't satisfied, so we added the access window over the middle row, which is where most if not all of the holdup was. It should now be under 5 minutes to change a belt, and we plan on practicing those belt changes.
20-01-2011 18:16
Akash Rastogi
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
Are all the internals from Gates belting? Or did you use something else? Just curious.
20-01-2011 18:22
Chris is me
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
|
Originally Posted by Akash Rastogi
Are all the internals from Gates belting? Or did you use something else? Just curious.
|
21-01-2011 10:57
Brandon Holley
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
|
Originally Posted by Chris is me
Yup, all Gates. Can't beat the price.
|
-Brando
21-01-2011 15:26
Dr Theta
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
I particularly enjoy seeing this design come to fruition from its initial stages. Ah the design process at work is a beautiful thing.
21-01-2011 23:11
Sh1ine
Re: pic: 2791 Chassis (Not A Teaser)
|
Originally Posted by Brandon Holley
What pitch/belt width?
-Brando |
view entire thread
Tags
loading ...