|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Our robot for the 2011 FRC Season : Raptor
A video of it in action:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XECmOwmYiu8
19-02-2011 19:36
O'SancheskiI will be the first to comment and that is the coolest looking bot i have ever seen
19-02-2011 19:41
Matt704Another year, another great Robot!! See y'all in Dallas. 
19-02-2011 19:44
O'SancheskiI was just looking closely at your drivetrain. Is that the same drive system you guys used last year?
19-02-2011 19:44
MrForbes
Beautiful! Hope to see it in person later this season...
19-02-2011 19:44
HegemoniI cannot wait to see this bot in action. Jaw dropping to say the least.
19-02-2011 19:46
BrendanBWow! This is one of the most beautiful robots I have seen!
Another quality machine from the 148 crew!
19-02-2011 19:55
Chris is meCongratulations. That's really all I have to say.
19-02-2011 19:57
MattC9Another great one I counting down the days to Alamo to see this bad boy in action. Just curious, why the name raptor after armadillo, tornado, tumble weed, ect.
19-02-2011 20:01
jwfossI for one am glad I live and compete in New England. Awesome job guys.
19-02-2011 20:01
DinerKidBeautiful. Just Beautiful. I need to calm down before i can figure out what i am feeling...
~DK
19-02-2011 20:09
JaneYoung
|
Another great one I counting down the days to Alamo to see this bad boy in action. Just curious, why the name raptor after armadillo, tornado, tumble weed, ect.
|
19-02-2011 20:12
Zach O
Between the underglow and the engineering, it's mesmerizing.
Great video to go along with it. It's always fun to watch the videos.
19-02-2011 20:17
BJCI really like the way you throw tubes out to the end of the lane instead of going up to the wall.
Oh ya, cool robot too.
19-02-2011 20:22
s_forbesKiller mechanism, the extending linkage on the top is brilliant! The large gear/arm member on the bottom looks like a part that could cause a lot of headaches... did you have any strange issues to overcome with meshing a gear to the stacked aluminum plates?
I also love the way you implemented a telescoping mechanism with the rollers in the tube, I'm gonna have to play with that idea in the future. Lots of clever bits wrapped into your bot this year.
Fantastic robot as usual, and once again I'm super jealous of your fabrication abilities.
19-02-2011 20:24
thefro526
Wow.
That robot is amazing, I'm especially fond of the deployment system for the mini-bot.
Way to go 148.
19-02-2011 20:30
JVN|
Killer mechanism, the extending linkage on the top is brilliant! The large gear/arm member on the bottom looks like a part that could cause a lot of headaches... did you have any strange issues to overcome with meshing a gear to the stacked aluminum plates?
I also love the way you implemented a telescoping mechanism with the rollers in the tube, I'm gonna have to play with that idea in the future. Lots of clever bits wrapped into your bot this year. Fantastic robot as usual, and once again I'm super jealous of your fabrication abilities. |
19-02-2011 20:42
sgrecoThat right there is what FIRST is all about...simply inspiring...
19-02-2011 21:00
EricH
It reminds me of a certain dominating machine from 2007... with some very scary twists. Scary, that is, if you're behind the opposite glass. Looking good!
19-02-2011 21:35
Kevin Kolodziej
Very nice robot, 148. Much to learn from this one. Good luck to you this year, and you can be sure I'll be paying your pit a visit in St. Louis
P.S. Awesome musical taste, as usual 
19-02-2011 21:41
Brandon Holley
Eh, looks decent.... 
Kudos on another terrific machine 148. The hard work your entire team puts in all season really shows in the final(ish) product.
-Brando
19-02-2011 22:07
Adam FreemanThank you, this is exactly what I needed after a long day in the shop.
Great design! I love the push link and the roller claw....seems vaguely familiar.
Thanks for the note
Can't wait to see it in person. I guess I will have to watch the video a few more times...maybe there's more hidden gems.
Awesome job 148!
EDIT: Didn't notice the first 10 times, but that is an articulating roller claw....just amazing!
19-02-2011 22:47
Aren_Hill
Not enough polycord for a Raptor john
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/33501

19-02-2011 23:26
1086VEXwow... i wish we could get the chance to play with you guys more often. your bots are always some of the most intricate and well designed machines out there. props on another insane bot!! best of luck this year!
19-02-2011 23:31
ratdude747wow... you guys seem to love the the robot lights.
looks sweet, thats for sure. performs well.
Good luck!
19-02-2011 23:58
Pat FairbankTotally awesome. I've been following the blog all season, and the finished product definitely exceeds the high expectations I developed from that.
Can't wait to see it in person at CMP (and maybe get a guided tour of the subtleties?).
|
Yes, we are proud of some of the more subtle features inside Raptor. I know there are some that most people totally ignore that will be impressive to a mechanical designer with a good eye...
|
20-02-2011 00:19
AdamHeard
It's a great machine, I loved the intro! Love the four bar even more, especially combining the rotation of the claw into the four bar.
I hope it does better than the last two robots named raptor (973 in 09, and 254 in 07), both fell in the semis at champs.
20-02-2011 00:28
Akash Rastogi|
I for one am glad I live and compete in New England. Awesome job guys.
|
20-02-2011 00:48
robodude03John and 148 Members,
This is a beautiful machine and excellent intro video as always. We hope to see you in champs and good luck this season! I absolutely love the physical stop you placed on the arm to articulate the tubes into the right position.
20-02-2011 01:27
SteveGPageJVN and crew:
You are more than engineers, you are artists!
(or maybe that should read - you are more than artists, you are engineers!)
20-02-2011 01:44
Arefin Bari
Dear team 148,
You are giving me nightmares. I admire your capabilities and your teamwork. Thank you for sharing the video with us and I sure hope I get the chance to see this robot in person. You all are an inspiration to the young generation.
- Arefin.
20-02-2011 01:47
Jacob PaikoffGreat video, awesome robot.
I hope that I have a chance to see it in person in St. Louis
20-02-2011 02:28
flippy147852Wow... once again 148 has produced a stellar bot.
Can't wait to (hopefully) see it in person in St. Louis!
20-02-2011 03:05
Leav
What can I add beyond what has already been said? I am quite simply floored.
If you are making a pamphlet which explains your robot mechanically (I'm thinking of this one from simbotics in 08), I'd love to see it.
I'm constantly sharing great designs with my team and, well, let's say your design "qualifies"... 
Yet another reason for us to strive for st. louis...
-Leav
20-02-2011 08:26
TetramanCan you imagine what they can do if a "feeder robot" was on their alliance?
20-02-2011 08:52
MagiChau|
Can you imagine what they can do if a "feeder robot" was on their alliance?
|
20-02-2011 11:54
kgzakVideo has been blocked by Sony Music Entertainment 
20-02-2011 12:30
Alex.qWow. I love robots like this where everything is planned out and fits together perfectly. I'd love to work on a robot like yours.
I'm interested in how you guys operate during the build season. How long does your team take to design before you begin to build the robot, when do the programmers get their hands on it, how much time do you leave for drivers to practice?
20-02-2011 12:38
Bjenks548Glad this beast in down in Texas. Unfortunately I'm going to have to deal with its Green twin probably. Any specs on the Mini bot speed? Looks to be magnetic. Robot looks awesome, hope you aren't on the blue alliance too much.
20-02-2011 12:49
Greg Needel
|
Unfortunately I'm going to have to deal with its Green twin probably.
|
20-02-2011 13:01
Amy Yznaga|
I'm interested in how you guys operate during the build season. How long does your team take to design before you begin to build the robot, when do the programmers get their hands on it, how much time do you leave for drivers to practice?
|
20-02-2011 15:07
Bjenks548Was there any collaboration between 217 and 148 this year?
20-02-2011 15:16
Greg Needel
20-02-2011 15:30
ks_mumupsinice looking, though I wouldnt expect anythin gless
.. hope to see you guys in St. Louis.
20-02-2011 16:32
pacoliketacoOne of my favorite videos this time of year is always the final display from 148. yet again i am not disappointed. you guys amaze me in what you are capable of. One thing id like to know is how you train your students to make such amazing robots. The design alone must take many many hours of CADing. as a sophomore meche with a considerable amount of design experience i know I'd have quite a challenge making something like your robots.
20-02-2011 18:05
Andrew SchreiberEh, it is ok, I think it will get better as the season progresses.
Seriously though, nice video can't wait to see how this thing works by the time Championship comes around.
20-02-2011 18:24
bcharbonneauGreat job again RoboWranglers. We look forward to seeing you in San Antonio.(Team 1296).
20-02-2011 19:35
Tyler HicksI noticed there is a 217 sign in the background of the shop.
Hmmmmm.
20-02-2011 19:49
ahollenbachIt's beautiful! Everything is so fluid and an excellent design!
20-02-2011 19:53
EricH
|
I noticed there is a 217 sign in the background of the shop.
Hmmmmm. |
20-02-2011 20:00
Nick RixfordSick bot as always! hope to see you at St. Louis!
20-02-2011 20:08
ouellet348nice bot, I'll be curious to see what 217 and 1114 look like this year though, either way this is a very well engineered bot
20-02-2011 21:09
James Tonthat
|
Yes, we are proud of some of the more subtle features inside Raptor. I know there are some that most people totally ignore that will be impressive to a mechanical designer with a good eye...
|
20-02-2011 21:21
Norman JEchoing the sentiments of many before me, I congratulate 148 on an awesomely impressive robot. Your designs are inspiring and your videos extremely cool.
20-02-2011 21:54
Karthik
I was going to post a funny joke, but it may not have been appreciated.
Either way, awesome robot once again.
20-02-2011 21:58
samir13kKarthik took down his funny joke so i took down my funny response :/
on the other hand though, Oh dang...
20-02-2011 22:08
xSAWxBLADEx|
I was going to post a funny joke, but it may not have been appreciated.
Either way, awesome robot once again. |
20-02-2011 22:28
nuggetsylThe mini bot alone will win most of there matches. Great job guys.
21-02-2011 03:30
PaWI really have to commend your media crew. The insane amount of hours it must've taken to compile all the pictures and edit the video footage... that is A LOT of work. And every year, the reveal video is breathtaking, and just a bit better than the previous year. Nice work!
The robot looks pretty good too. 
My jaw has become quite adept at self-healing, even with all the repeated drops to the floor.
21-02-2011 12:40
SuburBotHello Robowranglers,
Very impressive robot!
This year, I'm hosting a Robot video unveiling competition. More info can be found here:
http://suburbots2115.wordpress.com/ruv-comp/
I believe your video fits all the requirements. Would you consider joining for the chance to win bragging rights and a PNG image file badge? All you have to do is post your team name and number and a link to your video on this CD thread:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...threadid=88184
Thank You
21-02-2011 14:35
JesseKGreat music selection
and a front-contending bot as usual. I got some interest in creating an offseason nonadrive based on this video, but I'm still fairly certain it's beyond our fabrication abilities. Maybe we'll do a 12fps+ slide drive instead.
Those of us who never saw 67's linkage are left to ponder the way the 148 linkage works. Is it like the locomotive linkages on old-school trains?
21-02-2011 16:07
Chris is meI've got a question. This question isn't a criticism disguised as a question.
What reasons would a team want to deviate from the "standard" method of powering an arm by bolting a sprocket to it and chaining it off a high reduction gearmotor? Basically, what are the advantages of the cool linkage pushing up on your arm as opposed to driving the rotational joint of the arm?
I've never learned much about arms and I don't understand the advantage or disadvantage of either system, other than CG placement.
21-02-2011 16:13
Bochek|
I've got a question. This question isn't a criticism disguised as a question.
What reasons would a team want to deviate from the "standard" method of powering an arm by bolting a sprocket to it and chaining it off a high reduction gearmotor? Basically, what are the advantages of the cool linkage pushing up on your arm as opposed to driving the rotational joint of the arm? I've never learned much about arms and I don't understand the advantage or disadvantage of either system, other than CG placement. |
21-02-2011 16:51
JVN|
I've got a question. This question isn't a criticism disguised as a question.
What reasons would a team want to deviate from the "standard" method of powering an arm by bolting a sprocket to it and chaining it off a high reduction gearmotor? Basically, what are the advantages of the cool linkage pushing up on your arm as opposed to driving the rotational joint of the arm? I've never learned much about arms and I don't understand the advantage or disadvantage of either system, other than CG placement. |
21-02-2011 17:33
Bochek|
CG isn't reason enough?
One other reason is my hatred of chain, but mainly for CG reasons. I would also suspect this is lighter than an equivalent low-gearbox + chain + sprocket... Plus... c'mon... DOUBLE FOURBAR! |
21-02-2011 17:45
AdamHeard
|
Now I must ask, where does your hatred of chain come from? Honestly The only time i have ever had problems is when it is very very poorly tensioned.
-Bochek |
21-02-2011 17:49
MasonMMOh, my god. Double fourbar! What does it mean?!
Its so vivid!
21-02-2011 18:14
Adam Freeman|
I've never learned much about arms and I don't understand the advantage or disadvantage of either system, other than CG placement.
|
21-02-2011 18:33
MrForbes
|
I would imagine their goal is to keep making cool, great performing stuff, while never having to do repair or maintenance.
|
21-02-2011 18:50
JaneYoung
|
If they don't have to repair or maintain the robot, they can spend their time and talent improving it. I like that idea.
|
23-02-2011 12:02
JVN|
Those of us who never saw 67's linkage are left to ponder the way the 148 linkage works. Is it like the locomotive linkages on old-school trains?
|
23-02-2011 12:06
Akash Rastogi|
I just put up a blog post highlighting how the linkage works:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...hip-joint.html -John |
23-02-2011 13:51
Brandon Holley
|
I just put up a blog post highlighting how the linkage works:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...hip-joint.html -John |
23-02-2011 14:25
JVN|
Very cool. Thanks for explaining.
What's driving the hip joint on your robot? |
23-02-2011 15:45
Brandon Holley
|
The shoulder joint is driven by (1) Banebots 775 motor, and (12) bands of surgical tubing.
You can see the 775 in this pic: http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-rFQ0CRqTKR...0/IMG_8024.JPG -John |
23-02-2011 16:00
JVN|
You guys obviously rivet a lot, I assume you have a pneumatic rivet gun.
Any recommendations on one that is pretty reliable? -Brando |
23-02-2011 16:18
Garret
This robot is amazing.
I would think that the double fourbar linkage would actually simplify the arm's joint design (at least in my mind it seems so much easier to deal with weight and taking loads) in that you would have to worry less about powering the pivoting point (gearboxes and chain) and instead focus on the making the actual joint stronger and more stable. I also could see it as isolating the motors and gearboxes from the abuse (as in side loads) the arm could take in a match, which I see as beneficial seeing how much defense this robot will likely have to put up with. Those are some of many potential benefits that I thought of when I first saw it.
24-02-2011 11:17
JVN|
Yes, we are proud of some of the more subtle features inside Raptor. I know there are some that most people totally ignore that will be impressive to a mechanical designer with a good eye...
-John |
24-02-2011 11:22
thefro526
|
Here is a glimpse at one of the SIMPLE subtle features that I think makes Raptor special... press-on CIM pinions: http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...ion-gears.html -John |
24-02-2011 11:26
IKEWow. The press on pinions are very elegant. Did you guys do any slip calcs or tests?
24-02-2011 11:26
Brandon Holley
|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
Here is a glimpse at one of the SIMPLE subtle features that I think makes Raptor special... press-on CIM pinions: http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...ion-gears.html -John |
24-02-2011 11:28
Chris is meThat's a cool idea! I wish we had the resources to try cool things like that.
What's the easiest way for Low Resource Team to get press on CIM pinions?
24-02-2011 11:32
Aren_Hill
Well it works for dewalt pinions, why not elsewhere, great idea
24-02-2011 11:38
MrForbes
If you had the right size reamer, you could do it that way....
Press fits are a reliable way of holding gears onto shafts. Getting the fit right is sort of critical, but even if you can get it within a thousandth of an inch or so you should be ok, if it's a tight enough fit.
Drills don't work too well for this.
Also the dewalt gear is IMHO too small to fit reliably on the CIM shaft, there just isn't enough meat there. Others will disagree...
24-02-2011 12:04
JVN|
Wow, that's a really good idea. I can't tell from the picture, but does the pinion have the Key Shape cut into it, or do you just rely on the press fit to transfer the torque?
|
24-02-2011 12:11
Travis Hoffman
|
What's the easiest way for Low Resource Team to get press on CIM pinions? |

24-02-2011 12:53
Andy Baker
24-02-2011 12:57
thefro526
|
We rely on just the press fit to transfer the torque. It works fine -- no problems after hours of aggressive use.
|
|
Huh, what, did someone mention me in the same thread as this beautiful and effective robot?
I will be sure to bug John and Greg about this in San Antonio next week. Andy |
24-02-2011 14:39
MrForbes
|
Hmmm, I really, really hope this makes it into the AM Product line. Now that I think about it, Press Fit Pinions would make transmission assembly way easier.
|
24-02-2011 16:15
Manoel
|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
Here is a glimpse at one of the SIMPLE subtle features that I think makes Raptor special... press-on CIM pinions: http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...ion-gears.html -John |
24-02-2011 16:42
Greg Needel
|
That's a cool idea! I wish we had the resources to try cool things like that.
What's the easiest way for Low Resource Team to get press on CIM pinions? |
24-02-2011 18:36
Cory
|
The easy answer is find someone with a wire edm to make them for you. You can do pressfits with a reamer on a lathe, but the issue with these is that every gear that I found that was off the shelf 11tooth already had a bore which was over the pressfit size. So you would need to find a source for some gear stock (if you find it let me know I couldn't find any. )
|
24-02-2011 23:08
Meredith NovakAwesome robot, 'Ranglers. Can't wait to see it in person next week!!!
We will be up against a Raptor and a Dragon...and we look like a duck...a mighty duck...
25-02-2011 13:40
JVN|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
|
25-02-2011 14:04
Madison
|
Another in this series, discussing the one of the reasons we chose to build the design we did, and some more detail on the wrist joint:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...st-joints.html -John |
26-02-2011 17:14
JVN|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
|
26-02-2011 17:56
Cory
|
Here is another in this series describing our use of aluminum plate gears this season:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...ate-gears.html -John |
26-02-2011 18:29
sgrecoI'm curious as to why you chose to stack plates instead of just cutting a thicker plate? I can understand if it was really thick for cost purposes, like over a half an inch, but wouldn't it be easier for a 3/8 piece to just cut one from a thicker piece of metal? I suppose if you're laser cutting then thicker aluminum isn't an option on all lasers because of aluminum's reflective properties.
I've also always been curious, are your parts lasered of waterjetted?
26-02-2011 18:56
JVN|
John,
I'm curious how you avoid misalignment of the teeth relative to each plate after assembly. Do you bolt both plates together and then cut the teeth? Do you use pins to align them and then clamp them with bolts? is it just "good enough" that you can bolt them together without any alignment aids? |
26-02-2011 18:57
JVN|
I'm curious as to why you chose to stack plates instead of just cutting a thicker plate? I can understand if it was really thick for cost purposes, like over a half an inch, but wouldn't it be easier for a 3/8 piece to just cut one from a thicker piece of metal? I suppose if you're laser cutting then thicker aluminum isn't an option on all lasers because of aluminum's reflective properties.
I've also always been curious, are your parts lasered of waterjetted? |
26-02-2011 22:59
s_forbesCool stuff, John!
Maybe you guys need to start up a Robowranglers R&D division to test more neat ideas like this... you can attempt all kinds of weird projects that would normally be foolish to try during a build season*. Though it sounds like your offseason work already accomplishes this. 
*cough* walking robot *cough* *cough*
27-02-2011 11:32
LBseale|
CG isn't reason enough?
One other reason is my hatred of chain, but mainly for CG reasons. I would also suspect this is lighter than an equivalent low-gearbox + chain + sprocket... Plus... c'mon... DOUBLE FOURBAR! |
27-02-2011 11:59
JVN|
If you dislike chain so much, why did you choose to chain together your omni-wheels and traction wheels? From your models it looks like you have enough CAD experience to space and use timing belts. SolidWorks (at least, maybe Inventor does too) comes with a tool for calculating belt lengths that's very handy. Belts are quieter and don't need tensioning.
|
27-02-2011 12:02
sdcantrell56We've used laser cut gears in manipulators before when a small range of motion was desired but Ive never thought about using them in a drive application. Be sure to post up at the end of the season about any wear issues you encountered because otherwise it is a very simple solution to custom gears. I'll be sure to check them out at alamo.
27-02-2011 12:22
JaneYoung
I wonder if there is any maximum allowance of people/teams per pit. Looks like 148 is going have a crowd. Non-stop.
Again.
27-02-2011 13:18
Ian Curtis
How do you generate the tooth profiles? Does IFI just have a piece of software that spits it out, do you do it by hand
, or is there a handy SW feature that I've missed that does it for you?
27-02-2011 13:28
MagiChau|
I wonder if there is any maximum allowance of people/teams per pit. Looks like 148 is going have a crowd. Non-stop.
Again. |
27-02-2011 13:41
JaneYoung
|
Well 148 would be nagged about the safety issue of too much people crowding your pit.
|
27-02-2011 14:00
JVN|
How do you generate the tooth profiles? Does IFI just have a piece of software that spits it out, do you do it by hand
, or is there a handy SW feature that I've missed that does it for you? |
27-02-2011 16:17
Tristan Lall|
There are lots of ways to do this. Some of my favs:
1. Pull out your handy Machinist's Handbook and sketch the tooth profile by hand. 2. Buy one of those gear profile generation programs and get it to spit it out for you. 3. Download the gear from somewhere online. bostongear.com has all their gears available online. For this year's robot we used option 3. I downloaded the gear I wanted from Boston gear, then traced over the tooth in Solidworks (eliminating splines with simple arcs, so it would import cleaner into our laser cutter's NC program). I grabbed this sketch, dropped it into a new sheetmetal part and away we went... -John |
28-02-2011 10:53
JVN|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
|
28-02-2011 10:58
MrForbes
Nice drive module!
for making that strange gear for the arm lifter....you could also get the arm gear from a door window regulator from a car, and trace it onto the aluminum

28-02-2011 12:47
sdcantrell56Why did you decide to ditch the drop down perpendicular omni wheel this year? I would think strafing would be the only upside to this whole switching drivetrain
28-02-2011 13:28
hurtzmyhead|
Why did you decide to ditch the drop down perpendicular omni wheel this year? I would think strafing would be the only upside to this whole switching drivetrain
|
28-02-2011 13:30
tim-tim|
Why did you decide to ditch the drop down perpendicular omni wheel this year? I would think strafing would be the only upside to this whole switching drivetrain
|
28-02-2011 13:57
Chris is me|
From the blog on the drive module, he states that there is a reduction through gears and another through chain. This essential provides a two speed transmission with two different driving characteristics. This will allow for a change of speed and torque. The omni-wheels still provide more degrees of freedom for the robot to move in, than IFI traction wheels.
|
28-02-2011 14:01
tim-tim@ Chris, you do bring bring up a valid point. However, the omni-wheels will allow for a more maneuverable robot. This is what I was trying to say. Thanks for catching that
28-02-2011 14:10
Joe G.
I can imagine that the all-omni wheel drivetrain would create a nice "drift" effect when turning around during high-speed motion, a maneuver that can be seen at about 1:44 in their video. I can imagine that this will come in handy, due to the "back and forth" nature of driving in this game, and that this may have actually been hampered by the kicker wheel.
CAD drawings that flash by all feature a kicker wheel, as well as many practice bot pictures. But all footage of the final robot seems to place the battery in the center of the robot, in place of the mass of sheet metal that (presumably) supported the sideways wheel.
Also, John mentions a major change to subsystem 1 (the drivetrain) here. Coincidence? Or iterative design?
28-02-2011 14:45
JVN|
I can imagine that the all-omni wheel drivetrain would create a nice "drift" effect when turning around during high-speed motion, a maneuver that can be seen at about 1:44 in their video. I can imagine that this will come in handy, due to the "back and forth" nature of driving in this game, and that this may have actually been hampered by the kicker wheel.
CAD drawings that flash by all feature a kicker wheel, as well as many practice bot pictures. But all footage of the final robot seems to place the battery in the center of the robot, in place of the mass of sheet metal that (presumably) supported the sideways wheel. Also, John mentions a major change to subsystem 1 (the drivetrain) here. Coincidence? Or iterative design? |
28-02-2011 15:13
sanddragI remember way back to 2003, team 980 had a similar drive system in which they raised or lowered two different sets of wheels to essentially have two different final drive speeds/ratios.
28-02-2011 15:16
Manoel
|
I remember way back to 2003, team 980 had a similar drive system in which they raised or lowered two different sets of wheels to essentially have two different final drive speeds/ratios.
|
28-02-2011 17:26
sdcantrell56While I think its cool shifting wheels instead of shifting gears, I don't really see how it is simpler at all. A transmission is quite compact and requires a small amount of force to shift versus needing enough force to lift the robot to drop down the traction wheels. The only potential benefit I see of this system without the perpendicular omni wheel is the ability to change the center of rotation although the benefit of that wouldn't necessarily be worth the added weight of the system.
JVN given that you ended up taking out the 5th omni wheel would you stick with this drive if you could do it over or go with a more conventional 6 or 8wd with shifting transmission?
28-02-2011 17:32
AdamHeard
|
While I think its cool shifting wheels instead of shifting gears, I don't really see how it is simpler at all. A transmission is quite compact and requires a small amount of force to shift versus needing enough force to lift the robot to drop down the traction wheels. The only potential benefit I see of this system without the perpendicular omni wheel is the ability to change the center of rotation although the benefit of that wouldn't necessarily be worth the added weight of the system.
JVN given that you ended up taking out the 5th omni wheel would you stick with this drive if you could do it over or go with a more conventional 6 or 8wd with shifting transmission? |
28-02-2011 17:37
Chris is me|
Utlizing COTS gearboxes and wheels, a team with a drill press (or even a hand drill), could make such a drivetrain.
|
28-02-2011 18:53
Andrew Schreiber|
While it can be done with less resources, I'd be worried about these low resource teams trying this, mainly because wheel pod side loading is a pretty big concern with this style of drivetrain.
By the way, the above blog post refers to large performance gains with the removal of the 5th wheel. What are those gains? |
28-02-2011 18:57
Chris is me|
Depends on the way you place your wheels. Obviously if you use omni wheels as your dropped wheels you will slide rather than break the pods. If you use traction wheels the problem becomes more significant.
|
28-02-2011 18:58
JVN|
Depends on the way you place your wheels. Obviously if you use omni wheels as your dropped wheels you will slide rather than break the pods. If you use traction wheels the problem becomes more significant.
|
28-02-2011 20:32
Dad1279|
While it can be done with less resources, I'd be worried about these low resource teams trying this, mainly because wheel pod side loading is a pretty big concern with this style of drivetrain.
By the way, the above blog post refers to large performance gains with the removal of the 5th wheel. What are those gains? |

01-03-2011 09:34
JVN|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
|
01-03-2011 10:29
Alex Cormier
|
Another in this series:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/02/insid...retainers.html Want to retain a flanged bearing? Drill some holes and rivet a washer over the flange. -John |
01-03-2011 10:47
Greg Needel
|
Did you also replace the bolts in the AM omnis with rivets?
|
01-03-2011 12:35
Madison
01-03-2011 23:30
Captaindanhaha fusion answered the call for awsome funchional leds check it out at the bayou regional ladies and gentlemen
02-03-2011 01:02
lynca|
Yes we did and they haven't failed us yet. Not sure how much weight we saved by doing this but anything we can do to save a little bit is worth the effort. Additionally by doing this it was and opportunity to check each roller to make sure it rolled freely.
|
02-03-2011 11:48
Akash RastogiOn the topic of plate gears, I remembered that 1771 had plate gears integrated into their turreted shooter's hood. The entire thing was also turreted on a huge laser cut sprocket. Guess they should've published some documentation on their robots! What a dominant machine they had that year.
I'm hoping 1477 and 2415 also have some cool integrated components in the coming seasons.
For anyone interested, it was a simple but pretty cool application.
02-03-2011 11:52
Andrew Schreiber|
On the topic of plate gears, I remembered that 1771 had plate gears integrated into their turreted shooter's hood. The entire thing was also turreted on a huge laser cut sprocket. Guess they should've published some documentation on their robots! What a dominant machine they had that year.
I'm hoping 1477 and 2415 also have some cool integrated components in the coming seasons. |
02-03-2011 12:31
jwfossThe adjustable length four bar link is a really slick trick. I've had that sketched out in my engineering notebook since the first time I ever saw that done back in 2008 at FLR. They had an adjustable lower link to stay within the sizing rules and to tilt the gripper up, whereas you adjust your upperlink to actuate your wrist. Also I believe theirs may have been passive (gas shock) where your is pnuematically adjusted.
FRC67 - HOT from 2008
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/30680
02-03-2011 12:52
pwnageNickThis robot is awesome. My first year of FRC was last year, and I remember being very frightened after seeing your promo video last year. I can't wait to see how you guys do at Alamo this weekend. Good luck this season 148, 2949 can't wait to see you guys perform at Worlds!
02-03-2011 21:00
Redo91You guys always impress.
Are you not worried with getting pushed too easily from the side when your traction wheels are up?
How well does the robot turn when the traction wheels are down?
I wish I could see your robot in person.
02-03-2011 21:55
Adam Freeman|
The adjustable length four bar link is a really slick trick. I've had that sketched out in my engineering notebook since the first time I ever saw that done back in 2008 at FLR. They had an adjustable lower link to stay within the sizing rules and to tilt the gripper up, whereas you adjust your upperlink to actuate your wrist. Also I believe theirs may have been passive (gas shock) where your is pnuematically adjusted.
FRC67 - HOT from 2008 http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/30680 |
02-03-2011 22:15
JVN|
After receiving a number of requests in response to this post, I decided to highlight some of the subtle parts of this year's design on my blog as part of an "Inside Raptor" series.
|

03-03-2011 12:22
JesseKHmm. More compactness (potentially):
1. Fix 2 long VEX metal pieces to the dead axle of the arm such that one of the square holes is concentric with the axle. The hole will have to be enlarged of course. The two pieces of metal should be far enough apart that the slop is minimized, regardless of whether the potentiometer gear is cantilevered or dual-supported.
2. Attach the VEX gear to the arm, as shown.
3. Attach the potentiometer and the potentiometer gear to the VEX metal using appropriate spacing for the chosen gears. The spacing is built-in since it's VEX.
4. Profit.
We've always had issues with potentiometers since we can't seem to keep them from slipping in the shafts we directly mount them to (thus needing to recalibrate them). Or the rubber band / polycord belts we make slip. It results in a bad calibration. Maybe we can try VEX this off season. Right now we use limit switches with encoders -- not too bad coding-wise, but man that's a lot of little wires to run.
03-03-2011 12:32
Travis Hoffman
|
We've always had issues with potentiometers since we can't seem to keep them from slipping in the shafts we directly mount them to (thus needing to recalibrate them). |
04-03-2011 17:24
ChuckDickerson148 just scored 2 uber tubes BY THEMSELVES in autonomous during match number 55 at Alamo! Now folks, THAT defines just how uber cool 148 are!
04-03-2011 18:11
waialua359Nice job!
That's two teams now that can score 2 in auto.
The other being that one Michigan team that posted a video of it.
04-03-2011 18:23
Tom BottiglieriHey John that's a pretty cool piece of SOFTWARE you've got there. 
07-03-2011 11:31
JVNSome video of Raptor in the elimination rounds of the 2011 Alamo Regional:
http://blog.iamjvn.com/2011/03/san-a...011-video.html
Check out Final 1 for a glimpse of the week 1 national high score, and our 2 tube autonomous mode.
22-02-2012 22:02
tim-timThe 2012 release should be in the near future.
Correction, the much anticipated 2012 release should be in the near future, and I can't wait.
22-02-2012 22:06
stundt1http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g3jeR...eature=channel
There human player has skill.
22-02-2012 22:09
its da PAT!!!
22-02-2012 22:11
s_forbes
22-02-2012 22:16
CalTran
148 released their robot already??
*reads thread*
I got played.
22-02-2012 22:16
Walter Deitzler
22-02-2012 22:21
V_Chip|
It is definetly a wide base.
I almost mistook it for the Raptor when I first saw it, becuase of the triangular frame. I wonder how it looks... ![]() |
22-02-2012 22:22
tim-timSorry for the false hope guys. It is not unusual for 148 to release their robot soon after the ship/bag&tag deadline.
I will agree that it does appear to be a wide based robot. However, I would not put it past JVN and Greg to have placed a 'fake' robot in the back corner to create discussion...
I am just waiting on how simple their design will be (as always, simple, clean, and effective).
22-02-2012 22:25
Walter Deitzler
It looks as if they have a tall bridge lowering arm or ball manipulator running up the front, then a shooter tower behind it. The image is too fuzzy to make out anything from there.
22-02-2012 22:51
ChristopherSDWould it upset you all if I mentioned that this is their 2011 robot?
22-02-2012 22:57
BrendanB|
Would it upset you all if I mentioned that this is their 2011 robot?
|
22-02-2012 22:57
akoscielski3
|
Would it upset you all if I mentioned that this is their 2011 robot?
|