|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team 1503's entry for LOGO MOTION, featuring a single-speed six-wheel drive, a single-jointed arm for feeder pickup, and a pneumatic pinch claw.
Deployment system and minibot were off for improvement at the time the photo was taken.
23-02-2011 23:42
Pat FairbankI neglected to mention that the robot's name is SPARDIS (Scoring Points At Relative Dimensions In Space).
More pictures from the final weekend of build can be found here.
23-02-2011 23:54
Travis Hoffman
|
I neglected to mention that the robot's name is SPARDIS (Scoring Points At Relative Dimensions In Space).
More pictures from the final weekend of build can be found here. |
23-02-2011 23:58
Nick Lawrence
There is a bit of a backstory to this robot.
After the 2010 season, we took a step back and evaluated it as a whole and looked at our mistakes. We discovered that last year we tried to do too much, and ultimately exhausted our design and machining resources to the point of actually never finishing our 2010 robot.
So, this year we set out with a goal in mind: Build the absolute simplest robot possible to play the 2011 game.
This is our simplest creation to date.
Also, even with our current minibot deployment mechanism, we're 15 lbs underweight.
-Nick
24-02-2011 00:09
JeffyThe lightening in the arm support structure is pretty cool. Love the colors too.
24-02-2011 00:12
Nick Lawrence
|
The lightening in the arm support structure is pretty cool. Love the colors too.
|
24-02-2011 00:21
KpchemI have to say I'm a fan of the little light up display at the top of the arm. Is this purely decorative, or designed to tell the Feeder what tube to give you?
24-02-2011 00:26
Nick Lawrence
|
I have to say I'm a fan of the little light up display at the top of the arm. Is this purely decorative, or designed to tell the Feeder what tube to give you?
|
24-02-2011 01:15
Chris is me|
There is a bit of a backstory to this robot.
After the 2010 season, we took a step back and evaluated it as a whole and looked at our mistakes. We discovered that last year we tried to do too much, and ultimately exhausted our design and machining resources to the point of actually never finishing our 2010 robot. So, this year we set out with a goal in mind: Build the absolute simplest robot possible to play the 2011 game. This is our simplest creation to date. Also, even with our current minibot deployment mechanism, we're 15 lbs underweight. -Nick |
24-02-2011 01:31
Blackphantom91@ chris WHATT!!!!!
The robot looks really cool +1 also on the DR.Who reference.
24-02-2011 07:33
Paul Copioli| So, this year we set out with a goal in mind: Build the absolute simplest robot possible to play the 2011 game. |
24-02-2011 07:44
Nick Lawrence
|
Nick,
You will find that you will never stray away from this strategy ever again ... I think you will be very happy with your decision. Good luck this year. Paul |
24-02-2011 09:11
thefro526
Nick, Pat, 1503, the robot looks excellent.
Any Plans to add a floor pickup mechanism?
24-02-2011 12:27
Akash Rastogi|
Nick, Pat, 1503, the robot looks excellent.
Any Plans to add a floor pickup mechanism? |
24-02-2011 12:33
Nick Lawrence
|
I think they will wait to see what the best strategy out on the field will be before they add anything. I have a feeling the smart teams will throw tubes as little often as possible.
|
24-02-2011 12:38
thefro526
|
I think they will wait to see what the best strategy out on the field will be before they add anything. I have a feeling the smart teams will throw tubes as little often as possible.
|

24-02-2011 18:42
PayneTrainThis is what team 422 learned. Build a complex and ultimately failing robot in 2008, then build a ridiculously simple robot and win 2009 Quality Award and become 2010 Regional Finalists. Simplicity is the best design strategy, even in real life engineering.
24-02-2011 22:14
basicxmanDo the lights fade in and out upon teleop initialization? Does it make the oh so awesome TARDIS sound? 
24-02-2011 23:23
Nick Lawrence
|
Do the lights fade in and out upon teleop initialization? Does it make the oh so awesome TARDIS sound?
![]() |
24-02-2011 23:24
BrendanBBeautiful robot 1503! I see big things for you!
24-02-2011 23:29
548swimmer|
Thank you. One of our mentors actually made punches for this, and we actually flange the edges of the lightening holes out. This makes the individual pieces much much stronger.
-Nick |
24-02-2011 23:41
basicxman|
The lights are used for a variety of things, including but not limited to human player signalling, diagnostics and decoration.
I wish it made that sound. -Nick |
24-02-2011 23:49
Nick Lawrence
|
I understand the benefits of large flanges, but I don't really see how flanging such a small area can add substantially to the cross-sectional area. I've thought about trying this before on some of our robot parts, but it always got shoved aside due to the extra fabrication time.
|
24-02-2011 23:53
548swimmer|
I was skeptical at first myself, until I tried to twist one of or siderails.
It takes a lot more force to do so with these flanged lightening holes. These punches made the difference between having to swiss cheese a super heavy over-trussed frame and being 15 lbs underweight. -Nick |
.
25-02-2011 00:00
Nick Lawrence
|
So do the punches punch and flange in one operation? If so, I want a set
. If not for the mini-flanges, would the sidewalls be just bare sheet? If so, that would explain why the mini-flanges help so much. |
25-02-2011 00:06
548swimmer|
Unfortunately, no they do not. We have two different punches for each shape, one that punches a smaller sized shape, then another that flanges the edges of that shape out.
All the pieces do have folds in them though. Here is a photo of one of our practice bot siderails being made. Here is a closeup of that siderail. After the first successful rail, we switched to an impact wrench to make things go faster. Also, our bearings holes are punched in the same way. It's really neat, come take a close look at our robot sometime. -Nick |
. Assuming we both make it to nationals, I'll check out your robot for sure!
08-03-2011 11:12
David DawsonHoly reduction batman! Is that a rs755 mated to a cimulator mated to a gem 3 stage planetary connected to at least a 3:1 chain reduction? When i come up with solutions like this my team makes me sit in the corner. This year i had to power our arm with two rs755 mated with cimulator and a tough box plus 3:1 chain reduction to make up for the lack of gearing.
08-03-2011 13:27
Pat Fairbank|
Holy reduction batman! Is that a rs755 mated to a cimulator mated to a gem 3 stage planetary connected to at least a 3:1 chain reduction? When i come up with solutions like this my team makes me sit in the corner. This year i had to power our arm with two rs755 mated with cimulator and a tough box plus 3:1 chain reduction to make up for the lack of gearing.
|
08-03-2011 13:42
Akash Rastogi|
There's also a 2:1 gear reduction in there after the GEM, which makes the total reduction 889.2:1.
It works surprisingly well, but one thing we've discovered is that the GEM won't backdrive (the radial load from the gear it drives causes the output shaft to bind inside somewhere), so we use a big wrench when we need to move the arm without power. |
08-03-2011 13:46
Pat Fairbank
12-03-2011 15:38
Akash RastogiAaaand 1503 proves you don't need floor loading to dominate at a regional.
12-03-2011 16:11
LeelandS
I just finished watching the Pittsburgh regional. You guys did great! Very well done. Seeing you guys run with 1114 was absolutely amazing. You guys have a very solid robot. I'll be watching GTR for sure, can't wait to see how you guys do.
Best of luck!
13-03-2011 00:34
Nick Lawrence
|
I just finished watching the Pittsburgh regional. You guys did great! Very well done. Seeing you guys run with 1114 was absolutely amazing. You guys have a very solid robot. I'll be watching GTR for sure, can't wait to see how you guys do.
Best of luck! |
13-03-2011 01:43
Justin Montois
|
Thank you very much! It was really cool to win with an old friend, it was nice to be on the same side of the field during eliminations once again.
-Nick |