|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Here we are! After many weeks of hard week, Blue Cheese would like to introduce this year's robot: Yarg!
Strategy: We will sit on the Key and let our allies feed balls to us.
Rationale: We don't have any wheels.
I think all we need to do is tidy up the wiring and we are all set...
03-02-2012 11:00
notmattlythgoe
Looks spectacular, see you at Virginia.
03-02-2012 11:54
jvriezenYour robot looks better than ours, at this point...
However, your appendage looks illegal, as it appears to be two appendages when it first crosses the frame perimeter. That's a no-no, according to the GDC Q&A on 2012-02-01
Q: Our question is similar to FRC1540. We want to put surgical tubing "whips" on a roller located at the frame perimeter. When this rotates the whips will extend beyond the frame perimeter. Is each "whip" its own apendage or is the assembly considered one appendage?
A: If multiple items exit the Frame Perimeter and are not contiguous outside the Frame Perimeter, they are considered multiple appendages.
03-02-2012 11:57
Timz3082|
Your robot looks better than ours, at this point...
However, your appendage looks illegal, as it appears to be two appendages when it first crosses the frame perimeter. That's a no-no, according to the GDC Q&A on 2012-02-01 Q: Our question is similar to FRC1540. We want to put surgical tubing "whips" on a roller located at the frame perimeter. When this rotates the whips will extend beyond the frame perimeter. Is each "whip" its own apendage or is the assembly considered one appendage? A: If multiple items exit the Frame Perimeter and are not contiguous outside the Frame Perimeter, they are considered multiple appendages. |
03-02-2012 12:07
wilsonmw04
03-02-2012 13:33
LightSpeedIII|
Your robot looks better than ours, at this point...
However, your appendage looks illegal, as it appears to be two appendages when it first crosses the frame perimeter. That's a no-no, according to the GDC Q&A on 2012-02-01 Q: Our question is similar to FRC1540. We want to put surgical tubing "whips" on a roller located at the frame perimeter. When this rotates the whips will extend beyond the frame perimeter. Is each "whip" its own apendage or is the assembly considered one appendage? A: If multiple items exit the Frame Perimeter and are not contiguous outside the Frame Perimeter, they are considered multiple appendages. |
03-02-2012 13:35
notmattlythgoe
Looks like angles on the chassis to traverse the barrier, what about the turret? Do you plan on rotating it or fixing it and using the drive train to rotate it? Did you guys ever get your cRio problems figured out last year? It was a shame to see such a nice looking bot with so much bad luck.
03-02-2012 13:44
PayneTrainYou guys know how hard it is to powder coat wood, right?
I was expecting something in the vein of your 2009 robot. Looks like this one won't disappoint either
03-02-2012 13:51
EricH
|
When the appendage fully extends, they are connected outside of the frame
|
03-02-2012 14:07
PatrickBrew1086|
Therein lies the problem. When the appendage fully extends, it's good. While it is in the process of extending, at least looking at current Q&A interpretations, it's 2 appendages, and you're only allowed 1. There is more discussion at http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=100696.
|
|
Looks like angles on the chassis to traverse the barrier, what about the turret? Do you plan on rotating it or fixing it and using the drive train to rotate it? Did you guys ever get your cRio problems figured out last year? It was a shame to see such a nice looking bot with so much bad luck.
|
03-02-2012 14:51
dellagd
Bears a striking resemblance to ours! The shooter is virtually the same!
03-02-2012 22:59
nahstobor
Looks like your 2012 drivetrain is in the upper right hand corner of the picture. 
03-02-2012 23:03
EricH
|
Looks like your 2012 drivetrain is in the upper right hand corner of the picture.
![]() |
03-02-2012 23:26
wilsonmw04|
Looks like the practice one. I think I saw a corner of the real one in the lower right.
|
| Bears a striking resemblance to ours! The shooter is virtually the same! |
03-02-2012 23:36
EricH
03-02-2012 23:40
wilsonmw04|
Yeah, you're bluffing about not having wheels. The shooter base has 4 (not counting shooter wheels), which don't look like they're powered yet, and that other chassis I mentioned is levitating (or has some form of wheels on it).
|
03-02-2012 23:42
|
well, let me qualify my response in saying we don't have the right wheels...
what you see are spaceholders until they arrive. |
03-02-2012 23:51
wilsonmw04
04-02-2012 01:24
wilsonmw04|
Therein lies the problem. When the appendage fully extends, it's good. While it is in the process of extending, at least looking at current Q&A interpretations, it's 2 appendages, and you're only allowed 1. There is more discussion at http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...d.php?t=100696.
|
04-02-2012 01:28
ratdude747|
we are sticking to our interpretation that what we have is legal. The connection between our two "halves" is outside the frame and therefore legal. I think some CD members are "over thinking the question" as I warn my Physics students...
|
04-02-2012 02:04
wilsonmw04|
Well, prepare to fail inspection. Q&A has pretty much said the opposite of what you assume.
(I don't like or agree with it, but if the GDC says it, it must be so.) |
04-02-2012 03:35
EricH
|
not to turn this into a copy of another tread, but this object is "continuous." Not sure where the GDC has said this is illegal. We will find out week 1 won't we?
|
04-02-2012 10:26
mrmummertSome observations from what i see...As mentioned the competiton robot
is in the background sans shooter and conveyor. It appears to be six wheel drive
with nylon wheels on one end. The ends of the frame appear to be beveled to
help the robot go over the barriers. On the practice/prototype robot the
conveyor is angled and driven by a window motor. It seems to be in line
with the shooter and gives the impression that some sort of turret will be used.
The shooter itself appears to be chain driven (No. 25 chain?) with 8" wheels.
The top of the shooter wheel appears to be about 50" off the floor. In the front
is a arm for pushing down the bridge and what appears to be another arm
that may be connected to the other one. This not only could be used to
push the bridge down, but also be used in conjuction with the beveled
frame to get over the barrier. It could also be used to right the robot if it
is tipped over forward if most of the weight is below the arms.
It appear the electronics will go low on the frame under the conveyor.
I would guess four CIMs will be used for the main drive and some
sort of cim-cim or cimulator set up will be used for the shooter.
04-02-2012 20:21
wilsonmw04mrmummert,
Well done! many interesting observations from what you can see in the pic.
we are busy making two copies now. hope to have something more complete to share soon. Never understood folks not sharing whole robots during build...
07-02-2012 22:27

08-02-2012 22:59
wilsonmw04quick update:
looks like the appendages will be legal after all. With them on. we seem to resemble the following:

10-02-2012 09:16
iblis432Interesting robot. 2106 begins build today on ours. Can't wait to start making the basic frame. XD Perhaps we will make it turn on, we're not sure yet. All we know is it will consist of at least 5 pounds of metal, however any more that is still up for grabs atm. (Sadly, as much as I want to say I am joking, I am not, we are indeed BEGINNING build right about now.)
14-02-2012 21:09
wilsonmw04update as of tonight:

getting there! waiting on the banebots order that shipped today to finish it off...
14-02-2012 22:53
HinfoiltatI was convinced that you actually had no wheels for a moment there Well played. Excellent work guys!
15-02-2012 10:48
PayneTrainWow, are you guys really not powdercoating your robot this year? Looks like you're running out of time.
How tall are you guys looking? Looks like the 42-48 inch range we wanted, but I can't tell.
15-02-2012 10:51
wilsonmw04|
Wow, are you guys really not powdercoating your robot this year? Looks like you're running out of time.
How tall are you guys looking? Looks like the 42-48 inch range we wanted, but I can't tell. |
18-02-2012 01:01
wilsonmw04http://www.flickr.com/photos/wilsonmw04/6894988729/
The first shot with the prototype.
22-02-2012 00:25
wilsonmw04well we are done! Yarg is complete.

Thank you to all our sponsors, and a special thank you to our new build site PCS. We now have 3 weeks to program on our practice bot "Proto Baggins."
We will be ready to play in VA and NC. Best of luck to everyone!
22-02-2012 01:49
delsaner
From a big fan up North (
), I wish the best of luck to you guys!! Alas, 1676 won't be coming to VA this year, but hopefully we can play each other at Championships!!
27-03-2012 09:36
wilsonmw04a new bridge manipulator?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=17wq-Hk9p4A
27-03-2012 11:11
Nathan Streeter
27-03-2012 18:01
RubixCubero
27-03-2012 18:14
PayneTrainHipster Team 422: abandoned their failing bridge mechanism for wheelies before it was cool, yo.
Good to see you've somehow managed to bring more of a spectacle to North Carolina than Virginia. Catch you guys there.
27-03-2012 20:58
mrmummertWe did that while practicing....but you might find it acts differently with the
bumpers on. If you try it..be careful not to flip it. It could happen.
27-03-2012 21:42
wilsonmw04
27-03-2012 21:52
PayneTrain539 had an appendage come out from the bottom for a controlled wheelie, I believe. Our driver just kinda... pulled it off in a match. As a coach who gets emotionally involved in a match sometimes, I nearly passed out when I saw Jack just pick up the front half of the robot with the joysticks and just throw it on the bridge.
27-03-2012 22:48
mrmummertMight be a good way to get over the barrier also...might be a bit hard
on the electronics though. We had Jags in ours at first but killed two of them
going over the barrier and changed them to the tougher Victors.
I'll be volunteering at NC so maybe I'll get to see you all do it.
02-04-2012 23:12
wilsonmw04Showing our inspiration and giving credit where credit is due:

02-04-2012 23:27
Nathan Streeter|
Showing our inspiration and giving credit where credit is due:
![]() |
02-04-2012 23:39
wilsonmw04the range of shot is good. Shots are consistent. having a problem with oscillation with our PID loop. keep shots are set for 2300 RPM but the fly wheel is moving +/- 200 RPM of target. Guessing we need to up the "I"?
02-04-2012 23:55
Nathan Streeter|
the range of shot is good. Shots are consistent. having a problem with oscillation with our PID loop. keep shots are set for 2300 RPM but the fly wheel is moving +/- 200 RPM of target. Guessing we need to up the "I"?
|