|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Just messing around again. Here is a 3" diameter mecanum wheel with a 2 speed gear box. The speeds would be about 6.4 and 12.7 fps. The wheel has 8 rollers, bearings in the wheel, gear bolted to the side, dead shaft. CAD says the weight of the assembly (with aluminum plates not lexan) is about 6 pounds. My conclusion: I don't know if it would work or not but the 3" mecanum wheel looks really odd.
16-07-2012 21:54
PAR_WIG1350Yes, a three inch mecanum wheel would be a bit ridiculous, a wheel of any type smaller than 4 inches is rare in FRC.
On another note, you should consider how you are mounting these. Mecanum drives do weird things when any of the four wheels lifts off of the ground so some sort of suspension is recommended.
16-07-2012 22:10
Tom OreYes - it's not a serious proposal. Just got to thinking about it and wondered what it would look like.
16-07-2012 22:12
MattC9Have you tried shifting with mech's befor?
16-07-2012 22:21
Tom Ore
16-07-2012 23:24
Gregor
|
We did a mini-octocanum drive last year and had mecanums with fixed raised wheels for climbing the ramp in 2010. We've never done a shifting version. (The mini wheels were 2" diameter Colsons.)
|
17-07-2012 03:39
Tom Ore|
What is mini-octocanum? Is it standard octocanum with smaller "tank" wheels?
|
17-07-2012 03:49
GRT808What CAD software is this?
Personally, I am interested in what you did you color the bearings. I haven't been able to make them look like the shiny metal bearings you have.
Very nice render!
17-07-2012 04:55
Tom Ore|
What CAD software is this?
Personally, I am interested in what you did you color the bearings. I haven't been able to make them look like the shiny metal bearings you have. Very nice render! |
17-07-2012 06:58
NemoTom, you're the man. You make some really sweet models, even if you're just fooling around with some of them.
17-07-2012 11:53
JesseKIf the wheels were 2.5" instead of 3", I'm not sure why this is infeasible at a first pass. I think this design would be robust enough for a FRC bot on a flat field under 2 conditions: 1.) The lexan that supports the outer edge of the dead axle were replaced with C-Channel and 2.) The robot frame only mounts to the C-Channel.
3"x1.5" C-channel with 0.2" leg thickness would work great. The added ounces of the Aluminum C-Channel would be offset by leaving the gearbox plates as polycarbonate. All robot impact forces resolve through the C-Channel, and the polycarbonate only needs to be strong enough to rigidly cantilever the CIM as shown.
17-07-2012 12:16
Ether
Hi Tom,
I'm interested in the rollers.
Could you post a spreadsheet (or a text file) of the roller contour profile (roller radius vs position along roller axis). Thanks.
17-07-2012 14:50
Tom Ore|
Hi Tom, I'm interested in the rollers. Could you post a spreadsheet (or a text file) of the roller contour profile (roller radius vs position along roller axis). Thanks. |
17-07-2012 21:29
GRT808Is this with Creo Parametric? How long did it take you to render this? As for the bearings, did you color them entirely chrome? Or did you color them any additional colors (for example, different faces different colors, etc).
17-07-2012 22:05
Tom Ore|
Is this with Creo Parametric? How long did it take you to render this? As for the bearings, did you color them entirely chrome? Or did you color them any additional colors (for example, different faces different colors, etc).
|
17-07-2012 22:13
GRT808Amazing render, I've got an assembly of a transmission and I'll try that chrome color to the bearings thanks!