|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
27-08-2012 21:52
CamrenInteresting I assume those are machine lathed. But from what material?
27-08-2012 21:59
Josh Fox
|
Interesting I assume those are machine lathed. But from what material?
|
27-08-2012 22:03
Garret
| Interesting I assume those are machine lathed. But from what material? |
27-08-2012 22:03
Alex Cormier
Photo title says delrin. It's a good all around plastic that doesn't wear when using polycords. It's a bit heavy though.
27-08-2012 22:08
Camren|
Photo title says delrin. It's a good all around plastic that doesn't wear when using polycords. It's a bit heavy though.
|
27-08-2012 22:39
theawesome1730Hope that there is never enough friction generated to melt/burn the Delrin, the fumes/smoke it gives off is like tear gas
27-08-2012 22:45
Mk.32Hello all,
These are machined from Delrin 1inch stock.
They weigh about .3lbs each; which we found to be reasonable for the pulleys and a LOT lighter and cleaner then our last solution.
Delrin is pretty stiff stuff and as poly cord pulleys shouldn't ever experience friction to really melt/burn it.
28-08-2012 08:11
Jared Russell
What is the OD of the grooves? No worries about the rod deflecting under tension?
28-08-2012 08:54
Brandon Holley
To go along with Jared's questions, what diameter round belting (polycord) are you using? If the pulleys are machined from 1" diameter stock, you may be very far below the suggested minimum pulley size.
-Brando
28-08-2012 10:37
JesseKMost polycord has a minimum pulley diameter, and the pulley diameter gets bigger as the cord diameter gets bigger. Exceeding the minimum diameter puts extra load on the motor driving it.
For example, the hollow Yellow Round Urethane belts my team likes to use (McMaster # 6567K56) has a minimum pulley diameter of 1.5". This year we were able to get away with a 1" diameter @ 3% cord stretch, given the gearing & power of the motors we chose. If we used a weaker motor or faster gearing, we would have probably enforced the 1.5" diameter design parameter. We also relaxed the belts overnight and in between competition so they didn't wear faster than expected.
Just something to keep in mind.
28-08-2012 12:01
Mk.32The ID of the pulleys are .64 in.
We are using a smaller diameter then what was recommend but from past experience not have a lot of problems with it.
We are going to put these in later today, and I will report back about any problems.
28-08-2012 14:18
topgun|
For example, the hollow Yellow Round Urethane belts my team likes to use (McMaster # 6567K56) has a minimum pulley diameter of 1.5". This year we were able to get away with a 1" diameter @ 3% cord stretch, given the gearing & power of the motors we chose.
|
28-08-2012 14:58
IndySam
|
Doesn't the hollow round belting flatten out when installed? Have you had trouble with the little connectors coming out?
We have only used the solid round belting but I am wondering if anyone can give a quick pros/cons of solid versus hollow. - T |
28-08-2012 16:50
Garret
| Doesn't the hollow round belting flatten out when installed? Have you had trouble with the little connectors coming out? |
28-08-2012 18:23
Mk.32|
In 2011 when we used 1/4" belting for our claw we had no problems with the connectors, however this year with the 3/16" belting it seemed as if we were always losing at least 1 belt because a connector came undone. I would attribute this to more likely too much tension on the belts but nevertheless something to be aware of.
|
29-08-2012 01:13
Mk.32So my worst fears as been confirmed, the .6 ID of these pulleys make them to flexible. Under the load of 4 cords there is about an 1/8 of an inch of deflection which makes them very stiff to turn. We are switching to 6061-T6 and with an ID of .66.
29-08-2012 01:51
artdutra04
|
So my worst fears as been confirmed, the .6 ID of these pulleys make them to flexible. Under the load of 4 cords there is about an 1/8 of an inch of deflection which makes them very stiff to turn. We are switching to 6061-T6 and with an ID of .66.
|
29-08-2012 01:55
R.C.
|
If you can, go with a much larger OD and use round hollow tube for the roller material.
1.5" diameter x 0.040" to 0.063" wall thickness aluminum tube works great for polycord rollers. |
)
29-08-2012 01:56
AdamHeard
|
If you can, go with a much larger OD and use round hollow tube for the roller material.
1.5" diameter x 0.040" to 0.063" wall thickness aluminum tube works great for polycord rollers. |
29-08-2012 09:15
JesseKIf you want to avoid grooves altogether, a plate of finger guides may work. See the bottom-left of this photo:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/37572
02-09-2012 12:52
BlacksmithWoodsNice, these look great! I wish I had those. I had to bang those out made out of wood on our homemade lathe. http://www.chiefdelphi.com/forums/sh...Homemade+Lathe