Go to Post Will the real John V-Neun please stand up, please stand up? - Elgin Clock [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Rob Stehlik

By: Rob Stehlik
New: 17-12-2012 13:05
Updated: 17-12-2012 13:05
Views: 1722 times


Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Last year in pursuit of stronger, more concentric mounting of our wheel sprockets we used 5mm roll pins in three of the holes. They are a perfect fit in the sprockets and spacers. The holes in the wheel would have to be drilled out to 13/64" (approx. 0.2"). To put everything together we used an arbor press, but I'm sure you could use a hammer as well. The roll pins serve two purposes: they ensure the sprockets are perfectly aligned, and they transmit the torque from the sprocket to the wheel. Under high torque conditions, screws can shear, but the roll pins are much stronger in this type of loading. As the picture shows, the whole assembly is held together with 3 screws. The roll pins we used were from Mcmaster carr, part# 91611A318.

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Reply

17-12-2012 21:38

CalTran


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

How did the wheels actually fare in season? Did they hold up well? Ever shear a roll pin? What about replacing the wheels? Did you just have some extra wheels with this assembly? If you ran out of extras during a competition, how fast would you say that this assembly could be put together?



17-12-2012 23:32

DampRobot


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Yeah, I'll echo what CalTrain is saying here. Seems like an interesting idea, but it looks like it has assembly/disassembly disadvantages. Although I don't like dead axle wheels, if I did, I'd probably just use the regular #10 screws that the wheels are designed for. If nothing else, they're easier to assembly, and you can replace them a lot more easily if they break. I've also never had a problem with a poorly radially aligned sprocket like you mentioned, so for me, it looks a bit like a solution in search of a problem.

On a separate note, those sprockets look poorly sized. With #25 chain, I would suspect that the smallest plate sprocket (32 teeth on AndyMark) would work just fine with 6" wheels. We ran roughtop 6" performance hex wheel with 16 tooth hex sprockets last year, and only ratcheted climbing the bridge. 60 tooth, or whatever you have here, looks like overkill.



18-12-2012 02:35

Mr. Lim


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

This small detail was a big improvement for us.

For anyone who has actually built a dead-axle drivetrain with two sprockets bolted to a wheel, and designed it with no need for chain tensioners (perfect link spacing), concentricity is a challenge. A small lack of concentricity becomes a significant issue, and it gets amplified the farther the sprocket gets from the wheel.

Screws aren't really meant to take shear force, and everything is a clearance hole, so there is some play in where the screw sits within the hole. Even if we "cranked it down" and set it up perfectly initially, we had concerns things could slide around, or even loosen/wear/slide over time. Robots smash into things, and are constantly going forwards and backwards at full power. All those forces are taken up by the clearance between the screws and holes, impacting the side of a screw that isn't ideal for transmitting shear force in the first place.

The roll pins solved all of these problems. The screws were relegated to simply holding the wheel, sprockets and spacers together - exactly what screws should be used for.

No we never had to replace a wheel, chain, sprocket, shaft-bolt, roll pin or service our drivetrain at all, other than pulling bits of carpet out of it, and inflating our tires. We played 46 official matches last year, an off-season event, and countless demos, and not so much as having to tighten a fastener.

...and that's largely thanks to little details like this that were implemented.

Yes we had spare assemblies made in case of a failure.

Yes, if needed, even I could manage to hammer a few roll pins in - probably in less time it would take for you to find a screwdriver for the crazy Canadian Robertson #10 screws we have up here.



18-12-2012 09:10

JesseK


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

We pressed the two bearings into the wheels, then put a long 3/8" bolt through the bearings. Then we hand-pressed a bearing into the outer sprocket of the assembly and assembled the wheel as shown. Once the bolts were properly tightened (note -- we didn't use the thread-making screws) we removed the 3/8" bolt et voila! a perfectly-aligned sprocket-wheel pairing. Even if you stick with your roll pin method, I'd recommend this method as a general concentric-assembly method.

The whole 'piloting' problem would be solved if AM/IFI would make their holes 0.192 rather than > 0.2". We water cut some holes on our shooter wheel at 0.192 and it was a perfect slip fit for #10 bolts with no wiggle on the assembled parts.



18-12-2012 09:16

Gary Dillard


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr. Lim View Post
and designed it with no need for chain tensioners (perfect link spacing)
Could you please supply the manufacturer and part number of your zero tolerance perfect fit bearings in the joints, the zero tolerance machine you use to put all the holes in the drive train, and the zero tolerance, zero stretch (infinite yield?) roller chain you used to obtain and maintain the "perfect" link spacing throughout the competition?

Back to the OP, I think the pin and screw combination is a great idea.



18-12-2012 09:26

Jon Stratis


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

We've use double-sprocket dead-axle drive trains in 5 of our 6 years, and every time we've only used the bolts it was designed for, along with appropriate spacers. We have never had an issue with this set up. Never sheered a bolt, never twisted it when it shouldn't have. This certainly looks like a great solution... but it's a solution to a problem we haven't seen. Is it common for teams to sheer bolts in this setup?



18-12-2012 09:35

Alan Anderson


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
Is it common for teams to sheer bolts in this setup?
I can't say I've ever seen one of these bolts actually sheared off, but there have been plenty of times in my experience where the shear forces were enough for a sprocket to get eccentric.



18-12-2012 09:40

akoscielski3


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
I can't say I've ever seen one of these bolts actually sheared off, but there have been plenty of times in my experience where the shear forces were enough for a sprocket to get eccentric.
This year at Smoky Mountains we sheared our bolts off. I noticed it when we were moving the wheels and the other wheels werent moving too. The middle wheel with the two sprockets was just floating there. We removed them with grade 8 bolts and never had another problem. Please note we took 3 of the bolts out and only had 3 bolts holding on each sprocket, not a good idea, i dont know who decided that.



18-12-2012 10:01

Brandon Holley


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

We are firmly in the live axle camp these days, as well as the timing belt camp so this is less of an issue for us. However, when were doing chain and sprocket with dead axle setups, eccentric sprockets WERE an issue for us as well.

I dont think we ever had issues with shearing bolts, but getting a nicely concentric wheel/sprocket combo is easier said than done. I think this is a good solution to the problem. For any one who uses a non-spring loaded tensioner setup (ie: a bolt pulling or pushing on the wheel assembly) think of the inefficiencies you could be experiencing with every rotation. To get a chain nice and tensioned all the time, you could be causing some serious binding when the sprocket passes its furthest-from-center point.


In regards to the sprockets slowly slipping over time, that is most definitely happening with plastic components involved in the wheel assembly. If you are using plastic wheels, or plastic hubs and you tighten them down nice and tight, over the course of the season the plastic material will creep. This could cause eccentricities down the road even with a concentric starting setup.

-Brando



18-12-2012 10:33

Rob Stehlik


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Quote:
Originally Posted by DampRobot View Post
Yeah, I'll echo what CalTrain is saying here. Seems like an interesting idea, but it looks like it has assembly/disassembly disadvantages. Although I don't like dead axle wheels, if I did, I'd probably just use the regular #10 screws that the wheels are designed for. If nothing else, they're easier to assembly, and you can replace them a lot more easily if they break.
True, this is slightly more difficult to assemble. It's not for everyone. But we liked how it kept things concentric and there was no chance of sheared bolts. The picture might be a little misleading since it shows the HiGrip wheel while we actually used 6" pneumatic wheels.

Quote:
Originally Posted by DampRobot View Post
On a separate note, those sprockets look poorly sized. With #25 chain, I would suspect that the smallest plate sprocket (32 teeth on AndyMark) would work just fine with 6" wheels. We ran roughtop 6" performance hex wheel with 16 tooth hex sprockets last year, and only ratcheted climbing the bridge. 60 tooth, or whatever you have here, looks like overkill.
Allow me to elaborate: We used the Cimple boxes last year because they were readily available. The student who designed the drivetrain was targeting a speed of about 9 ft/s. He found that for short distances, acceleration is more important than top speed. This dictated the rather large 48 tooth sprocket on the wheels to get the required reduction, since the Cimple box is only single stage.



18-12-2012 14:13

JJackson


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

We only had 3 bolts per wheel and never had an issue with them. However we use grade 8 flat head cap screws.



18-12-2012 20:19

Billfred


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jon Stratis View Post
We've use double-sprocket dead-axle drive trains in 5 of our 6 years, and every time we've only used the bolts it was designed for, along with appropriate spacers. We have never had an issue with this set up. Never sheered a bolt, never twisted it when it shouldn't have. This certainly looks like a great solution... but it's a solution to a problem we haven't seen. Is it common for teams to sheer bolts in this setup?
1618 in 2007 had this issue; after one good hard match we had five of the six bolts sheared off in our re-skinned kit wheels. The time of repair meant we had to send a human player to our next match (we lost it).

However, one incident in seven seasons of this style of bolt pattern is pretty respectable in my opinion.



18-12-2012 21:03

Phyrxes


Unread Re: pic: Better Sprocket Assembly with AndyMark Parts

Our problems with wheels are generally a student sourced assembly oversight which inevitably causes a screw to work its way lose and then promptly hit the frame and cause all manner of havoc. Anybody have any quick solutions to this, theoretically they are using nylon lock nuts but if someone has a "student proof" solution I'm all ears.



view entire thread

Reply
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:09.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi