|
|
If FIRST makes a field invisible to the audience, I will buy every team a dozen Krispy Kremes. - Chris is me [more] |
 |
|
|
|
|
Another Team 691 Swerve Module
By: Garret
New: 20-12-2012 19:58
Updated: 20-12-2012 20:33
Views: 1704 times
This is a project I did over the summer in order to try to come up with a better swerve module design for my team and practice CAD. This module is held on by the custom clamp in the picture which mounts into the end of a 2x1 aluminum tube (or on the side of any 1 inch tube).
Discussion
20-12-2012 22:43
MichaelBick
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
How thick is that tread?
21-12-2012 14:40
Chris is me
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
Quote:
Originally Posted by Garret
The tread is 1.5" thick on a custom wheel 3" wheel. The wheel can be swapped for a dead-axle 3" colson if I change the shaft from 5/8" to 1/2".
|
Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.
23-12-2012 22:41
AdamHeard
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.
|
Why?
Is the COTS hub you're referring to the stock delrin bushings, or the WCP hub?
24-12-2012 00:50
Garret
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
Any reason you can't run 3/8ths and use the COTS Colson hub? I'd be wary of using the super thin roller bearings in a drivetrain application.
|
Sorry for not responding earlier, there isn't any reason that prevents me from doing that, it would simply require the hole to be drilled out and the shaft replaced with a 3/8" bolt.
I hadn't done something like that initially because I was testing out the feasibility (from a design point of view) of having the module hold itself together as if it were one single piece. In this case the axle was actually a tube that fit into counter-bores on the two side plates, the intent was to make the shaft a structural member. This was done with the rest of the module by having the parts fit into slots or holes that would hold their positions instead of fasteners.
For this module only the 2 larger bolts going through the top are necessary to hold the module together and the other large bolt on the bottom just helps "strengthen" the shaft if the game required it (bumps, falling, etc...).
24-12-2012 13:53
Chris is me
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
You can still do a 3/8 tube axle and just tap the ends. I like the idea of using the bottom axle to make the module more rigid. You can't be too rigid with this kind of design!
25-12-2012 00:00
Garret
Re: pic: Another Team 691 Swerve Module
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris is me
You can still do a 3/8 tube axle and just tap the ends. I like the idea of using the bottom axle to make the module more rigid. You can't be too rigid with this kind of design!
|
I hadn't thought of doing that, that would actually be quite elegant if it is strong enough.
previous
next
Tags
loading ...
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 21:57.