|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Presenting an AM 775 motor on a Cimulator, takes about 10 minutes to make
24-02-2013 00:58
ksafin
What kind of output specs do you get? (both theoretical and tested, if you have them)
24-02-2013 16:31
Kevin Sevcik
Why this and not a 775 into a Versaplanetary?
24-02-2013 16:34
ksafin
24-02-2013 16:34
Ether
Looks like the air vents are blocked. That motor's gonna get hot.
24-02-2013 16:36
Gregor
|
Perhaps because of the CIM-like shaft & mounting holes instead of a hex shaft and odd mounting holes.
|
24-02-2013 16:39
Kevin Sevcik
|
Perhaps because of the CIM-like shaft & mounting holes instead of a hex shaft and odd mounting holes.
|
24-02-2013 17:04
Alpha BetaI'm not sure why Banebots doesn't advertise these better. We're trying them for the first time on one of our mechanisms because we wanted a smaller reduction than the AndyMark Cim-Sim. The smaller footprint and price was a nice bonus too.
24-02-2013 17:20
Kevin Sevcik
|
I'm not sure why Banebots doesn't advertise these better. We're trying them for the first time on one of our mechanisms because we wanted a small reduction than the AndyMark Cim-Sim. The smaller footprint and price was a nice bonus too.
|
24-02-2013 17:38
Alpha Beta|
Again, why the CIMULATOR instead of the Versa? The Versa is a 3:1, versus the 2.7:1 of the CIMULATOR, so I suppose the 10% speed boost might be worth it. And the Versa is a whole ounce heavier. On the otherhand, the Versa is in-line, which seems more compact to me in most situations.
|
25-02-2013 10:11
Clinton BolingerLet me answer or reply to a few questions and comments.
|
Originally Posted by Alpha Beta
a. already had one on hand
b. needed to save some weight c. size profile better fit the design constraints d. 10% speed boost is helpful e. $5 cheaper and need to find a way to use the Banebot voucher. *f. wanted to let others prove the reliability of the Versa's for a year before trusting the season to it. |