|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Sheet Metal Drivetrain CAD Practice:
-6WD
-28lbs
-CIMple boxes
-Belt-drive
-4in Dead-axle Colson wheels
We plan to build it in December as practice for the new students.
01-11-2013 11:56
BBray_T1296This looks really cool.
Hope to see pics once it is built
01-11-2013 15:29
JaredLooks cool! How are the pulleys attached to the colsons and how thick is the sheet metal?
01-11-2013 15:32
BBray_T1296My guess is that the pulleys are attached to the Colsons with this
01-11-2013 16:20
OblargLooks nice.
How are you handling the Colsons on dead axles? What size Colsons are you using? What pulleys are you using?
01-11-2013 17:41
BurkeHalderman|
Looks cool! How are the pulleys attached to the colsons and how thick is the sheet metal?
|
|
How are you handling the Colsons on dead axles? What size Colsons are you using? What pulleys are you using?
|
01-11-2013 17:59
OblargNice, I like that custom pulley design. Slick. No flanges?
Re: pulley stock, where do you buy yours? I bought some recently, and was dismayed at how expensive it is.
02-11-2013 06:41
MetalJacketLooks great!
One question for you though - how do you plan to mount bumpers? I have been practicing with sheet metal drive bases (my team plans to use one on a competition robot for the first time this year
) and I like the idea of having the flanges of the outermost panels bent outward but I'm not entirely sure how to mount bumpers securely.
02-11-2013 09:45
BurkeHalderman|
No flanges?
Re: pulley stock, where do you buy yours? I bought some recently, and was dismayed at how expensive it is. |
|
One question for you though - how do you plan to mount bumpers?
|
03-11-2013 12:48
Chris EndresYou loss a bunch of strength when you don't have the belly pan under the CIMs. try to fit the CIMs so the belly pan isn't cut out. Anyways, great job, looks like a good start to a great bot.
04-11-2013 09:50
jeremy callahanI'm sorry idk if you already answered this or not i didnt see it if you did. I was wondering what the thickness of the metal was and is all the metal machined or did you get any of it assembled for you? looks awesome to see the finish product!
04-11-2013 10:13
BurkeHaldermanAll the metal is .100" aluminum and is cut out using a laserjet and then bent on an automatic break, this is done by one of our machining sponsors. Then the students rivet the frame together.
As far as the overall design I owe a lot to the guys from 2168 and 228. Without their generosity and CAD files I wouldn't be anywhere near a production ready sheet metal drivetrain. Also the design for the pulley hubs was originally from 2168's 2013 robot and the weight reduction is heavily influenced from their 2011 base. What can I say I'm a huge fan!
04-11-2013 11:06
AdamHeard
|
We buy all our pulleys, pulley stock, and belts from SDP-SI. I agree the pulley stock is really expensive. At $60 for a 200mm bar I questioned if it was worth the cost to make our own hubs. Although the price drops a lot per bar the more you buy, which helps justify spending that kind of money.
I haven't put to much thought into mounting bumpers on this frame since it's just an offseason prototype, but I think what we'll do is something similar to 148's 2011 bumper system; put 1" hex standoffs in the corners and then use a uni-body bumper frame and bolt it to those hex standoffs. I'll CAD this and post a picture of it. Here is a front view of the bumper frame and hex mount: ![]() |
04-11-2013 11:28
BurkeHalderman
04-11-2013 13:50
mman1506|
Well it's actually about $230 total for all the pulley stock needed for the drive as we need 4 200mm bars of pulley stock. I only have experience using small belts on manipulators, nothing to this scale before, so i dont know if that price still a reasonable amount to spend on this drive?
|
04-11-2013 14:10
AdamHeard
|
Well it's actually about $230 total for all the pulley stock needed for the drive as we need 4 200mm bars of pulley stock. I only have experience using small belts on manipulators, nothing to this scale before, so i dont know if that price still a reasonable amount to spend on this drive?
|
04-11-2013 14:17
Chris is meThis is very similar to 2168's drivetrain this year. Check them out if you can.
I don't think having CIM relief pockets in the belly pan is going to drastically compromise rigidity. Being able to "drop out" the transmission can be really useful. You may want to make the cutouts around that access hole a little less aggressive, and possibly consider an additional cross member if your manipulator won't already serve that purpose. The Andymark Cross Hex stuff that comes with those gearboxes in the kit would be an easy way to add some cross support.
04-11-2013 20:27
BurkeHalderman|
For that price, I'd buy these pulleys from AM and bolt them to this hub from WCP.
|
|
This is very similar to 2168's drivetrain this year. Check them out if you can.
I don't think having CIM relief pockets in the belly pan is going to drastically compromise rigidity. Being able to "drop out" the transmission can be really useful. You may want to make the cutouts around that access hole a little less aggressive, and possibly consider an additional cross member if your manipulator won't already serve that purpose. The Andymark Cross Hex stuff that comes with those gearboxes in the kit would be an easy way to add some cross support. |
04-11-2013 21:45
MetalJacket|
From searching through the forums and reading all the posts about belt drives it was my understanding the GT2 profile and 9mm wide belts were the preferred setup for a FRC application, while the AM pulleys are HTD pulleys made for 15mm wide belts I would like to use the GT2 9mm belts as their smaller but the AM solution is tempting. Do you think the different profiles would have a noticeable difference?
|
. A team that we work with used the KoP chassis this year and had no problems that I can think of at this time with their drive. The added width is a disadvantage if you want things more compact though.