|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is an older CAD project of mine, while I was over on the other-side of the world this summer it hit me that I could make a really short swerve module by flipping motors from vertical to horizontal
The system has some experimental things that I'd like to eventually test. For instance the turning "gear" is actually a 5/8-18 bolt that is machined into the turning module. This is accomplished through a series of taps and machining runs to get the right amount of "teeth" around the entire module. This module also features a 2 speed ball shifter provided by VEX Pro just repackaged into a different housing.
Sensors are built in everywhere as well.
The entire module is 4.6 inches tall. Unsure on the weight it really depends on how I chose to manufacture it, and its been a while so I forgot the ratios. Drive wheel is a 2.5 inch Colson wheel with a modified colson hub from WCProducts.
As always comments, questions, and concerns are welcome.
P.S. Full Album found here:
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/101718392754230534136/albums/5947749989384789217
Pretty Render Credit: Cody Smith
17-11-2013 14:39
Beautiful design, Andrew. I remember you telling me over the summer it was tiny, but this is just insane! I'd love to see this make it onto an offseason chassis for testing.
17-11-2013 15:00
wasayanwer97This is amazing! Absolutely stunning.
These may be a stupid questions, but I can't seem to figure out what the orange housing around the wheel is. Is it 3D printed? Or will it be machined?
Also, what's acting as your thrust bearing?
Once again, amazing design.
(The render was done beautifully as well)
17-11-2013 15:17
Bryce2471I like the form factor of this design, although I'm curious why you decided to optimize this design for height. I have recently CAD'd a swerve module that is optimized for width. Because on many robots space in the middle of the robot is at a premium where as there is usually plenty of space for the height of the drive train. I found the limit of how thin I could make it was 3", partially because the CIM is 2.5" in diameter.
Is the wheel housing made of plastic?
Also I would be concerned with the linkage between the pneumatic cylinder and the shifting mechanism, you may get some racking.
Do you have a picture of the rendering from the other side?
What miter gears are you using above the wheel?
17-11-2013 15:23
yash101
Wow! That's what I call, engineering! Do you have any CAD models? That is impressive because it is small. How much does it weigh? I think my team might be interested in something like this!
17-11-2013 15:32
wasayanwer97|
I like the form factor of this design, although I'm curious why you decided to optimize this design for height. I have recently CAD'd a swerve module that is optimized for width. Because on many robots space in the middle of the robot is at a premium where as there is usually plenty of space for the height of the drive train.
|
17-11-2013 15:37
|
Wow! That's what I call, engineering! Do you have any CAD models?
|
17-11-2013 16:08
Brandon_LI can sum this all up with one word, I think.
Wow.
I think this beats out the one that was built around the CIM.
17-11-2013 16:18
Steven DonowWow, that is a beautiful render. What software/setup was used for it?
17-11-2013 17:03
yash101
17-11-2013 17:18
saikiranra
17-11-2013 17:20
pmangels17What is the actual ground clearance? I like the way you did the shifting mechanism.
17-11-2013 19:23
AdamHeard
|
On par with that one (They were a rookie team the season they made it and successfully implemented it).
I love it! It kinda looks like a Van Door Motor. |
17-11-2013 20:08
Mark SheridanVery impressive CAD. Can you post a picture of the other side? I love how over the past 10 years that I have been in FIRST is how much smaller drivetrains are today. I remember when I thought 6 inches wheels were tiny on a robot.
17-11-2013 23:20
Andrew SchreiberAndrew - Solid work. I haven't fully digested all of it, how about a few more angles?
17-11-2013 23:42
Aren_Hill
|
Andrew - Solid work. I haven't fully digested all of it, how about a few more angles?
Not just Aren... |
18-11-2013 01:05
Akash Rastogi
18-11-2013 01:11
rcmolloy
I'm going to go out on a limb for everyone here and ask for a STEP file. I think a few screen shots would do justice but the actual file would not only help all of us understand what's going on but also help you with specific design revisions after comments are posted.
18-11-2013 11:02
Brandon Zalinsky
18-11-2013 19:07
Andrew RemmersWow I got a lot of questions!
First off thanks for the compliments and questions!
Sorry for the late responses I have been busy for the past 24 ish hours.
Anyways Below I have answered a large majority of the questions I believe, If I missed yours feel free to remind me! Also I have made a Google+ Album of what I had screen capped from my CAD, including some requests.
https://plus.google.com/u/0/photos/1...49989384789217
|
These may be a stupid questions, but I can't seem to figure out what the orange housing around the wheel is. Is it 3D printed? Or will it be machined? Also, what's acting as your thrust bearing? |
| I like the form factor of this design, although I'm curious why you decided to optimize this design for height. I have recently CAD'd a swerve module that is optimized for width. |
| Is the wheel housing made of plastic? |
| Also I would be concerned with the linkage between the pneumatic cylinder and the shifting mechanism, you may get some racking. |
| What miter gears are you using above the wheel? |
| Do you have any CAD models? |
| What software/setup was used for it? |
| so... how do you mount it? |
| What is the actual ground clearance? |
| I'm going to go out on a limb for everyone here and ask for a STEP file. I think a few screen shots would do justice but the actual file would not only help all of us understand what's going on but also help you with specific design revisions after comments are posted. |
18-11-2013 19:20
Clem1640This is so cool! A great design project and really out of the box.
Great work!
19-11-2013 01:34
BBray_T1296In this picture, why did you opt to put the CIMs inward? I would think it would probably be more optimized with them along the outer walls, but I guess it would depend on attachments for piece manipulation. Maybe a staggered layout to put the CIMs side by side to gain room along a different dimension. (in this image, opt for a "wide bot" manipulator and turn the "front" two modules so the cims run along the "side" walls, freeing center space)

Sorry for the page reformatting lol
19-11-2013 08:41
Andrew Remmers|
In this picture, why did you opt to put the CIMs inward? I would think it would probably be more optimized with them along the outer walls, but I guess it would depend on attachments for piece manipulation. Maybe a staggered layout to put the CIMs side by side to gain room along a different dimension. (in this image, opt for a "wide bot" manipulator and turn the "front" two modules so the cims run along the "side" walls, freeing center space)
[removed] Sorry for the page reformatting lol |