|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Front View of our 90% completed robot. We have a big community unveiling on Valentines Day and then programming/testing all weekend before Bagging.
13-02-2014 14:17
Nick Lawrence
Beautiful work as always.
Looking Forward to seeing it up close and personal in late April.
-Nick
13-02-2014 14:19
BobbyVanNessThat looks amazing! You guys always build beautiful robots. Plus that AM (2013 version) high-grip wheel shattering drive train...
You guys are sure to be insanely competitive this year!
How far can it shoot?
13-02-2014 14:23
Ty TremblayAny way we can get an isometric or side view? For some reason this perspective is like kryptonite for the figure-out-how-it-works part of my brain.
13-02-2014 14:31
EricLeifermann
13-02-2014 14:37
BobbyVanNess|
Any way we can get an isometric or side view? For some reason this perspective is like kryptonite for the figure-out-how-it-works part of my brain.
|
13-02-2014 15:25
Pjohn1959
Hanging device in the back?? Just in case they reveal the secret end game we are all waiting for??? 
13-02-2014 15:29
ice.bergRemember to include the space heater in your crate before you pack it up and send it off to Duluth
As always though great looking robot. I am super excited to see it up close in a couple weeks. Best of luck on these last days of build
13-02-2014 15:42
Akash RastogiGlenn,
Excited to see 11 take the field with 359's robot this year at Hawaii, hopefully on the same side
Can't wait to see more views!
-Akash
13-02-2014 16:59
Lil' Lavery
Love the solution. Very elegant way to combine features
Any details on how the pneumatic launching mechanism works?
Is that #35 chain in the intake? Or more of the bicycle chain you use in your drivetrains?
13-02-2014 17:12
waialua359I should have put Teaser as the title since I purposely chose this view.
Its really simple to figure out how this robot scores if I showed the other views.
As far as drivetrain goes, we made improvements to acceleration, speed and power vs. our 2013 one.
There are 2 shooters on this robot, but the one on the rear is not assembled as we are still waiting for parts to finalize. The front uses pneumatic cylinders.
This is not similar to the Ri3D 1.0 other than the intake setup. However, we never looked at that robot as we developed ours. But then again, most intake designs I've seen so far are all similar using the horizontal bar approach.
Intake chain is the bicycle chain we use in our drivetrain.
We are able to use software pulsing (842 idea) for adjusting shots as well as another hardware mechanism that allows for higher shorter (up against goal) vs. lower farther shots. Most teams with a similar design have this feature....they just have to use it. For what we plan to do as our primary scoring, its not a huge difference though.
This was probably the best build season we had in a while since we used a modular approach to building.
How else will I justify getting a Waterjet? 