|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
A basic look at OPR distribution in divisions. Each is strong in a different way.
16-04-2014 17:54
joelg236
Related - the stats used here and a few extra interesting stats.

Stats here.
16-04-2014 18:17
JeffersonI really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional.
And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top.
16-04-2014 18:23
Abhishek RThis is a great format, really shows a lot of cool relations. Seems like although Curie is stacked up top, it has a weaker middle tier than the other divisions.
16-04-2014 18:24
joelg236
|
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional. And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top. |
16-04-2014 19:32
Jefferson|
We're definitely one of those teams. Unfortunately, it's hard to tell if a team has a lucky showing (good schedule, etc.) or just got a lot better (I think our team did).
I'll try and do the same analysis with average opr when I get home. |
16-04-2014 20:44
ks68|
I really like the presentation of the data for comparison here. Thanks for putting it together.
I wonder how it would change using average OPR instead of max. Some teams have a pretty significant variation from regional to regional. And wow... Curie seems to be STACKED at the top. |
16-04-2014 23:25
joelg236
More charts for you all
CCWM By Division

Top 10 CCWM

Top 25 CCWM

Top 10 OPR

Top 25 OPR

17-04-2014 08:26
Tim Lehmann4967It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!
17-04-2014 09:24
mwtidd|
It really looks as if they're attempting to end the Curie Curse! It is a shame Galileo is lacking a bit, but it'll be fun!
|
17-04-2014 12:48
joelg236
|
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
|
17-04-2014 22:16
Tim Lehmann4967|
On the contrary, look at the middle of the pack. Those teams are significantly stronger on Galieo. Remember that an alliance will only be as strong as its "weakest" link. Any alliance coming off of Galileo is going to be very well rounded.
|