Go to Post You don't need to be on a team to be involved with FIRST. - Koko Ed [more]
Home
Go Back   Chief Delphi > CD-Media > Photos
CD-Media   CD-Spy  
portal register members calendar search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read FAQ rules

photos

papers

everything



Omniwheel Minibot

Scott Kozutsky

By: Scott Kozutsky
New: 19-07-2014 00:59
Updated: 19-07-2014 00:59
Views: 2697 times


Omniwheel Minibot

This is a minibot I CADed up a little while ago and then spent some time learning how to render with. I really like the results personally.

The bot itself is made using 4 identical sideplates that are symmetrical in all directions and inspired by gearboxes found on WCDs like 254s. Other than that the only manufacturing is cut the tubes to length and press star nuts into the ones in the middle.

In it's current (easily modifiable) configuration it's geared 4.29:1 with 4 in omni wheels for a final free speed of 21ft/s with 1 CIM per side expandable to 2 per side if you widen the center beams.

The plan is to use RC receivers and LiPo batteries to save weight, space and money (and maybe add a little extra juice, the CIMs and Talons can handle it). Before the controller and battery (so everything in the rendering) this should cost just under $500 to make.

Recent Viewers

  • Guest

Discussion

view entire thread

Reply

19-07-2014 11:16

magnets


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

That's kind of cool. What on it makes it cost $500? $150 for the talons, $50 for the CIMs, and $300 for the aluminum/wheels?



19-07-2014 14:15

nathannfm


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Edit: ignore my post



19-07-2014 20:35

Scott Kozutsky


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by magnets View Post
That's kind of cool. What on it makes it cost $500? $150 for the talons, $50 for the CIMs, and $300 for the aluminum/wheels?
I actually parted out every part and pre-tax and pre-shipping it works out to $465. Those gears, pulleys, belts, bolts and tube nuts really add up. 4.5 in bolts are expensive.



19-07-2014 21:41

BBray_T1296


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

I think with something of that weight could get away with a significantly higher top speed.

Recall that a 150lb robot with 6 cims could top out at ~18fps, and that only because they can only travel 50ft before stopping.

If you were running it down a street or something you could push a full FRC robot to 25+fps over a hundred feet.

An antweight in comparison with just 2 cims should have no problem reaching 30 fps in 15-20 feet or so.

Then again, if you are operating in more confined places like classrooms or such, you would gain a control advantage topping out slower.

Also be careful, CIMs produce a significant amount of noise in the FM band. We converted a kitbot to run on a FM system and had control problems when we got 30+ feet away. We decided to seriously isolate our antenna from the CIMs, by putting the antenna higher and also wrapping the motors in layers of aluminum foil in an attempt to Faraday cage them.



19-07-2014 22:00

mman1506


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by BBray_T1296 View Post
Also be careful, CIMs produce a significant amount of noise in the FM band. We converted a kitbot to run on a FM system and had control problems when we got 30+ feet away. We decided to seriously isolate our antenna from the CIMs, by putting the antenna higher and also wrapping the motors in layers of aluminum foil in an attempt to Faraday cage them.
We use a 2.4 GHZ system on our V1 minibot and have had no issues. We're currently looking at running it on a 14.8V to 22.2V lipo so it should be faster than 21 ft/s that was estimated at 12v.



19-07-2014 23:34

ToddF


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Scott Kozutsky View Post
I actually parted out every part and pre-tax and pre-shipping it works out to $465. Those gears, pulleys, belts, bolts and tube nuts really add up. 4.5 in bolts are expensive.
If you post your BOM, we might be able to help you find less expensive sources for your components.



20-07-2014 00:12

Scott Kozutsky


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by ToddF View Post
If you post your BOM, we might be able to help you find less expensive sources for your components.
1/2" OD Round Tube Axle Stock (3 feet) http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/ha...ock.html?lulz= $11.99 2 $23.98 VEXpro
VersaHub (1.125" Bearing Pilot, 1/4" Thick, w/ Plate Sprocket Mount) http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/wh...ubs.html?lulz= $2.99 6 $17.94
60t Gear with 1.125" Bearing Bore & VersaKeys http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/ge...ars.html?lulz= $21.99 2 $43.98
4" Omni Wheel http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/wh...els.html?lulz= $17.99 4 $71.96
VersaPulley Kit (HTD 5mm) - 42T, 18mm wide http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/be...ley.html?lulz= $4.99 4 $19.96
14t CIM Gear (Steel) with Mounting Hardware http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/ge...ars.html?lulz= $7.99 2 $15.98
Timing Belt (HTD 5mm) - 170T, 9mm Wide http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/be...ts9.html?lulz= $10.99 2 $21.98
Flanged Bearing - 0.500" x 1.125" x 0.313" http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/ha...ngs.html?lulz= $2.99 8 $23.92
tube connector*25 http://www.mcmaster.com/#94290a510/=sdvhn7 $15.13 1 $15.13 McMaster
4.5in bolts-1/4-20 (pack of 5) http://www.mcmaster.com/?lulz=#91251a089/=se2p5q $8.26 3 $24.78

total $279.61

This was copy pasted from my spreadsheet so sorry about the formatting.
the first number at the end of each line is the cost per unit then the quantity then the total. It's mostly vex stuff because it's cheap, available and simple other than maybe a different source for belt i doubt it. We're also from Canada so that cuts down options. And honestly we will be making McMaster orders and Vex orders anyways so it's very little trouble.



20-07-2014 15:40

Alan Anderson


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

That looks like a very clean design. Well done.

But I can't understand the reason for using identically-oriented omniwheels in all four corners. Won't that let the 'bot slide sideways uncontrollably?



20-07-2014 16:23

mman1506


Unread

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
That looks like a very clean design. Well done.



But I can't understand the reason for using identically-oriented omniwheels in all four corners. Won't that let the 'bot slide sideways uncontrollably?

Sliding sideways uncontrollably sounds like a lot of fun. It's designed to be brought around to demos but the vex parts make it easy to switch the omni-wheels out for something less silly.



21-07-2014 02:02

nathannfm


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

If you do go to 4 CIMs I would gear them 1 to each wheel. If you keep the control system and batteries in the center I bet you could get it to flip and keep driving "upsidedown", that would be a pretty cool trick for demos. (added benefit, no belts)



21-07-2014 12:41

AdamHeard


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Make sure the lipos you get can handle the potentially huge currents 2 CIMs would cause. Trying to draw too much from them can cause thermal runaway and fire.

In terms of size and weight, I think you'd get a more satisfying performance by switching to 550's or 775 sized motors as you can shave a lot of size and weight off, without a large power loss.



21-07-2014 13:25

Chris Endres


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

I would have to agree with Adam; for this size, you wouldn't need that much power from two CIMs to move the weight of the bot.



21-07-2014 13:30

AdamHeard


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
That looks like a very clean design. Well done.

But I can't understand the reason for using identically-oriented omniwheels in all four corners. Won't that let the 'bot slide sideways uncontrollably?
Essentially 33 ran this drive this year.

Quite a few teams have run "butterfly" drives that have this + drop down tractions as a second mode.

We found that the robot tracks straight as on carpet the omnis still have appreciable lateral rolling resistance.

Our driver quickly figured out how to drift with it, and how to control those motions roughly.

In summary, it's more far more controllable than people assume.



21-07-2014 14:00

JohnFogarty


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Essentially 33 ran this drive this year.

Quite a few teams have run "butterfly" drives that have this + drop down tractions as a second mode.

We found that the robot tracks straight as on carpet the omnis still have appreciable lateral rolling resistance.

Our driver quickly figured out how to drift with it, and how to control those motions roughly.

In summary, it's more far more controllable than people assume.
I've made several FTC robots in my day that incorporate this drive. It's completely controllable and it's pretty fun to drive. I'm almost certain FTC 3864 has used it 5 years in a row now.



21-07-2014 22:41

Scott Kozutsky


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
Make sure the lipos you get can handle the potentially huge currents 2 CIMs would cause. Trying to draw too much from them can cause thermal runaway and fire.

In terms of size and weight, I think you'd get a more satisfying performance by switching to 550's or 775 sized motors as you can shave a lot of size and weight off, without a large power loss.
The reason I chose to go with CIMs is because it's actually cheaper and simpler than using those more sensible motors. The Cim motor isn't much more expensive than a 775 for instance but because of the lower speed and higher torque we don't need any additional stages and we don't need to buy either non-vex gears or versaplanetaries. Also, because it's so light I doubt we'll see the massive stall currents that CIMs are capable of.

I'm actually planning a WCD styled minibot that uses 500 series brushless motors (made out of 30mmx15mmx1.5mm alu extrusion, I need to practice my metric) so it will also fit the RS 550.



21-07-2014 22:45

mman1506


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by AdamHeard View Post
In terms of size and weight, I think you'd get a more satisfying performance by switching to 550's or 775 sized motors as you can shave a lot of size and weight off, without a large power loss.
Additionally you have to look at its intended use. We regularly do demos for 6 hours without cool downs. The additional thermal mass will prevent over heating the motors.



22-07-2014 18:05

ekapalka


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

I see you've got the rendering pretty well figured out. Could you share a bit about how it was done? It looks photorealistic



22-07-2014 18:10

mman1506


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by ekapalka View Post
I see you've got the rendering pretty well figured out. Could you share a bit about how it was done? It looks photorealistic
I'm no expert but it was done in Solidworks photoview. Make sure perspective is on. I also added a spotlight to make things look a little more realistic.



24-07-2014 19:00

Orion.DeYoe


Unread Re: pic: Omniwheel Minibot

Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan Anderson View Post
That looks like a very clean design. Well done.

But I can't understand the reason for using identically-oriented omniwheels in all four corners. Won't that let the 'bot slide sideways uncontrollably?
Controllability is relative. If you want to slide sideways then it does exactly what it's supposed to. Have you not seen 33's drive train (inspired by the JVN Build Blitz team I'm sure)?



view entire thread

Reply
previous
next

Tags

loading ...



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:40.

The Chief Delphi Forums are sponsored by Innovation First International, Inc.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © Chief Delphi