|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
I CADed this drive for fun one day this summer. I figured it might start an interesting discussion, so I decided to post a render.
12-09-2014 16:21
Navid Shafa
Care to share some specs, maybe a transmission close-up?
12-09-2014 16:29
Michael HillI'll admit, the "window" gearbox looks kinda cool.
12-09-2014 16:46
Rjmartin127Let's just refer to the quote in my signature.
12-09-2014 16:58
Nate Laverdure
Reminds me of an idea I once had for a "parallel radial" engine.

12-09-2014 17:35
Tyler2517|
Reminds me of an idea I once had for a "parallel radial" engine.
![]() |
12-09-2014 17:54
Nate Laverdure
12-09-2014 18:11
billbo9118 CIM drive?
Can you say "Popped our main breaker"?
Don't worry, you will!
12-09-2014 18:14
AdamHeard
|
8 CIM drive?
Can you say "Popped our main breaker"? Don't worry, you will! |
12-09-2014 18:30
AdamHeard
13-09-2014 01:12
philso|
Not really.
In many industries torque/current control is THE standard form of control. It wouldn't be crazy to limit max current to some time varying value. |
13-09-2014 01:28
Pauline TasciThat actually looks pretty cool and crazy fun!
13-09-2014 02:12
Bryce2471| Care to share some specs, maybe a transmission close-up? |
|
8 CIM drive? Can you say "Popped our main breaker"? Don't worry, you will! |
13-09-2014 02:18
Bryce2471
13-09-2014 11:21
billbo911|
Actually if teams use the current monitoring properly, a team could maximize the time motors spend in their peak efficiency range (errr, closer to peak at least) and still get large output output torques (less torque per motor, more torque overall).
If done right you'd get a decent performance increase and exactly ride whatever line you set in terms of net current draw. |
|
...
I don't really disagree, but I find it interesting you would say that without hearing what the final gear ratio is. ![]() |
13-09-2014 11:47
cjl2625|
8 CIM drive?
Can you say "Popped our main breaker"? Don't worry, you will! |
13-09-2014 12:17
sanddragCan you comment on what exact gears you would use if you were to make this?
13-09-2014 18:37
OblargDumb question: How would one remove a motor for maintenance, if needed? There doesn't seem to be much access.
13-09-2014 18:49
Chadfrom308|
8 CIM drive?
Can you say "Popped our main breaker"? Don't worry, you will! |
13-09-2014 19:06
DekeI love the outside the box thinking, looks like it was fun to work on!
14-09-2014 02:25
scca229|
Dumb question: How would one remove a motor for maintenance, if needed? There doesn't seem to be much access.
|
14-09-2014 02:48
Tyler2517Just a few questions i guess. It looks like you are using 4 bevel gears.
If you are using 4 would you not be loosing a large amounts of mechanical efficiency?
I love the idea i just think that using that many bevels would be a mistake even though it is a pretty sleek design.
14-09-2014 05:21
asid61|
Thanks!
![]() Unfortunately, I don't think our team will even be considering this idea because of budget constraints. I think it would be cool to see how this drive would work in real life though. It would certainly save belly pan space! ![]() |
14-09-2014 14:24
Ian Curtis
I'd love to see a 2 CIM version so you could have a "V-Twin" or even a 1 CIM that looks like a 1900ish motorcycle engine or model airplane engine. 
15-09-2014 01:30
Bryce2471|
I'd love to see a 2 CIM version so you could have a "V-Twin" or even a 1 CIM that looks like a 1900ish motorcycle engine or model airplane engine.
![]() |
15-09-2014 01:53
Bryce2471|
If you have access to a mill, lathe, indexing head, and pedestal grinder of any size, you can actually make your own bevel gears and regular gears to save a little on costs. Look up "how to make a gear hob". If you have a community college in your area, they might have a machine shop you could use.
Nice design for the gearbox. Looks like it can save on valuable horizontal real estate. |

15-09-2014 02:01
Bryce2471|
Just a few questions i guess. It looks like you are using 4 bevel gears.
If you are using 4 would you not be loosing a large amounts of mechanical efficiency? I love the idea i just think that using that many bevels would be a mistake even though it is a pretty sleek design. |
15-09-2014 02:09
Bryce2471|
Dumb question: How would one remove a motor for maintenance, if needed? There doesn't seem to be much access.
|

15-09-2014 02:13
Bryce2471|
Can you comment on what exact gears you would use if you were to make this?
|
16-09-2014 10:18
JustPlyZ|
We had 4 CIMs/4 Mini-CIMs on our drivetrain and didn't ever pop the breaker. That being said, we got a little lucky
|
16-09-2014 15:46
R.C.
|
We've had 6 CIMs/ and 2 mini CIMs,
4 of the CIMs were powering our drive and 2 CIMs + 2 minis were powering out shooter, we have yet to pop a breaker. ![]() |
17-09-2014 08:01
Chadfrom308|
We've had 6 CIMs/ and 2 mini CIMs,
4 of the CIMs were powering our drive and 2 CIMs + 2 minis were powering out shooter, we have yet to pop a breaker. ![]() |
17-09-2014 13:39
Bryce2471