|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
FRC3880 - The Tiki Techs - 2015 Drivetrain and Transmission Prototype.
Current setup: 4x2 Colson in the center set and 4x1.5 Colson on the outer set of wheels. This hex frame with the motors over the tires and chain in tube allows potentially a free center area of over 16.5"_x_28" to work with. Depending on battery orientation and electronics there is ample space potentially available for just about any tool ideas.
The custom transmission plates will allow use of any of the WCP dog gear and pinion sets allowing drive speed customization to suit the new game dynamics. A well as allowing motor and encoder orientation on either side. (separate post)
More to come! Looking forward to an exciting season!
Aloha
15-10-2014 17:19
Tyler2517That looks like you have a lot of extra weight in motors and gear box's are you sure you will need that much power in your drive train.
Why the 4 independent gear boxes?
15-10-2014 17:28
nathannfm|
That looks like you have a lot of extra weight in motors and gear box's are you sure you will need that much power in your drive train.
Why the 4 independent gear boxes? |
15-10-2014 18:15
waialua359|
Also, if that frame outside the wheels is not supporting the axles you could replace it with standoffs between the wheels (to comply with bumper rules) and move the drive rails out almost an inch on each side.
|
15-10-2014 19:29
SohaibAre you sure you have enough power?
15-10-2014 20:10
OblargNot so sure what I think about the 8-motor, 4-gearbox setup. Looks really heavy - what benefits are there, specifically, over a two-gearbox 6-CIM setup? Keep in mind that you'll also need more air and more tubing and more failure modes to shift with this gearbox arrangement.
15-10-2014 20:39
TikiTech|
I'm with you on this. With a smaller footprint the last 2 years, you could acquire more space to work with inside the drive rails area. Because our drive base is modulated using standoffs and plates, we were able to run our chain inside to add even more space AND have the access to the chain, sprockets, etc.
I like the hexagon shape. I'm assuming its to "help" get out of T-bone situations, if necessary? |
15-10-2014 20:43
My hex drivetrain is about 28 lbs. How much does this weigh? It looks overkill heavy, and a lot of your custom solutions seem to be poorly thought out. Could you detail your thought process behind the major details of the design?
15-10-2014 20:51
TikiTech|
Not so sure what I think about the 8-motor, 4-gearbox setup. Looks really heavy - what benefits are there, specifically, over a two-gearbox 6-CIM setup? Keep in mind that you'll also need more air and more tubing and more failure modes to shift with this gearbox arrangement.
|
15-10-2014 21:33
Abhishek RWith the chain in the tube, how are you managing to turn with the drive, wouldn't there be a large amount of wheel scrub? Maybe a plan to lathe the Colsons on the outside to be slightly smaller?
I like the hexagon shape. Interesting idea to be able to run the front and rear wheels at different speeds, I wonder what applications you could have with that setup.
15-10-2014 21:37
TikiTech|
My hex drivetrain is about 28 lbs. How much does this weigh? It looks overkill heavy, and a lot of your custom solutions seem to be poorly thought out. Could you detail your thought process behind the major details of the design?
|
15-10-2014 21:42
TikiTech|
With the chain in the tube, how are you managing to turn with the drive, wouldn't there be a large amount of wheel scrub? Maybe a plan to lathe the Colsons on the outside to be slightly smaller?
I like the hexagon shape. Interesting idea to be able to run the front and rear wheels at different speeds, I wonder what applications you could have with that setup. |
15-10-2014 22:05
|
Poorly thought out is not very helpful..
What do you think is poorly thought out? Current weight without the battery is 25lbs including electronics shown. This is our first attempt at a hex frame. Most of this design was based on what materials we have or can get locally. Being in Hawaii, shipping stock material to prototype with is very expensive, so we have to be creative with what is on hand and available. There is nothing here but Lowes and Home Depot. No real machine shops or metal vendors or the like here. Being a 4th year team we always enjoy learning different ideas, constructively.. Mahalo! |
15-10-2014 22:05
Abhishek R|
The drivetrain is set up as a WCD with the outer wheels offset (1/8" above the center).
We never had any scrubbing issues with our 6 wheel WCD. The center wheels are 7" apart and should not see much scrubbing. We do have some Omni wheels for the front/rear if tests proves it to be an issue. Just working on crazy ideas, never know what it could accomplish... Thanks! |
15-10-2014 22:26
Gregor
|
I use the term "poorly thought out" very loosely. It's just part of the vocabulary. What I mean to say is I can't tell your train of thought in this design, and there are many design choices I question because I do not understand the reasoning behind them (hence why I asked about your thought process behind it).
|
15-10-2014 22:56
asid61If you could consolidate your gearboxes into two 3 cim gearboxes, you could save a ton of weight and motors. I don't see the point in adding the power above 6 cims, unless you're planning on hitting 20 fps+ with 0.01s less time(not really math, just an order of magnitude calculation).
15-10-2014 23:16
Aren SiekmeierAs others have pointed out, there isn't much reason to go with 8 motors over 6, or even 4.
But even if you insist on 8, or at least having the option to mount more motors, you can still save a considerable amount of weight and improve performance by combining 4 on a side into a single transmission, with two output shafts. You can still do so with the WCP DS components.
Duplicating the shifting mechanism on both sides adds quite a bit of weight and cost and means that shifting may not be synchronized. Separating powertrains between front and back means that you could lose half your power if you're wedged or tipped up on your back four wheels. And there's more friction and inertia with all those stages.
Also, mounting the encoder on the input cluster like you've shown will introduce quite a bit more backlash between the encoder and your wheels, and will require knowledge of the precise shift state to schedule gains properly. Combining everything into one gearbox should give you some options to keep the encoder on the gearbox if you need to, while putting it much closer to the wheel, preferably downstream from the shift mechanism.
16-10-2014 02:08
Michael Corsetto
Apparently, hex/octagonal, chain-in-tube, CIM-over-center-wheel WCD is the new fad in DT Design.
Don't miss the forest for the trees here people.
This is coming from a team that rocked an octo-WCD in 2014.
Consider performing a honest and thorough weighted design table to determine if some of the innovations you are proposing actually outweigh the costs.
I would encourage all teams to practice this evaluation method in the pre-season. Just like there is no better time to learn CAD and DT Design, there's no better time to learn how to objectively evaluate designs based off a set list of requirements/criteria (trust me, this is no easy task. It is arguably harder than actually designing the mechanism!)
Beyond big-picture, love the effort being put forward. Winners are made in the off-season!
-Mike
16-10-2014 02:30
themccannmanI detect a serious lack of power and weight in this drivetrain. Far too little power, you'll get pushed all over the place, and not nearly enough material, your robot will float away in a light breeze. I would also certainly increase your gear count, you can never have enough reductions, efficiency can be dangerous. Additional gears certainly help your weight situation too, 4 individual gearboxes certainly capitalizes on this.
16-10-2014 03:52
nathannfm|
I really have a hard time believing that this drive system even without the electronics is 25 lbs.
|
16-10-2014 05:10
TikiTech|
I would not feel comfortable putting half the weight of my robot into gearboxes. This is even ignoring the breaker issues of an 8 motor high traction drive.
|
16-10-2014 11:12
Brian Selle|
Oh, I didn't realize there was a drop. I faintly remember team 118 having to use different sized wheels because they could not enough space in the tube to have a big enough drop with the sprockets and chain. Did you have a solution to that problem or did everything seem to fit inside the tube just fine?
|
16-10-2014 14:19
Abhishek R|
I think the difference is that 118 used a 1x2 tube so there no room for wheel drop. The 3880 prototype uses 1.5x3 tube so they have plenty of space.
|
16-10-2014 21:02
asid61|
Ok my bad. I am new to the iProperties thing.
This should have been caught by me, knowing that the CIMs together weigh about 5lbs. There is no way that transmission weighs 9 lbs!!! More like 3. The transmission is basically a hybrid of a WCP 2 CIM DS, 2.15lbs. and 3 CIM DS, 3.5lbs. Weight will be between that since it is basically a stretched DS if you will. A 2CIM DS with one extra idler. We went with an idler gear instead of belts. Much easier for us, we had it on hand. The entire transmission was designed using the existing gears from our 3CIM DS making it easy to test by just replacing the frames. Future orders of different gear ratios from WCP will just work. Last year we used the WCP 3CIM DS and are extremely happy with it. Never had any issues with breakers tripping on our 6 wheel WCD but space was tight. We wanted a stretched 2 CIM DS, if you will. That was set up for in-frame chain setup and over the frame motor orientation. (see hex frame). Being able to orientate the motors in either direction and a quick and easy encoder placement was the goal. Our competition bots have always had a post tapped into the front or rear axle that the encoder used. Not always pretty.. Something different for us.. |
18-10-2014 21:33
thinker&plannerAnyone ever hear of battery voltage drop causing cRIO to restart? ;p
I say this partly jokingly, but partly practically. Even with 6 CIM WCD we were dropping out consistently during offseason when we changed our ratio to about 9fps.
We are looking into limiting acceleration/deceleration, current limiting code, etc.
19-10-2014 17:59
nathannfm|
Anyone ever hear of battery voltage drop causing cRIO to restart? ;p
I say this partly jokingly, but partly practically. Even with 6 CIM WCD we were dropping out consistently during offseason when we changed our ratio to about 9fps. We are looking into limiting acceleration/deceleration, current limiting code, etc. |
26-10-2014 18:50
Cash4587Where might I find CAD models of the colson performa wheels? I am looking for a variety of them but don't know where to look. But what you have pictured is 4x1.5 and 4x2 if I am not mistaken and would be a good starting place for me. Any help is appreciated. I have checked 3dcontentcentral with no luck. Also google hasn't come up with a match yet.
Edit:
After more looking I found what I needed. Thanks.
26-10-2014 21:07
Tyler2517|
See if you can check your driver station logs for the voltage graph during your matches, that sounds like you might have some bad batteries.
|
27-10-2014 09:32
JesseK|
Where might I find CAD models of the colson performa wheels? I am looking for a variety of them but don't know where to look. But what you have pictured is 4x1.5 and 4x2 if I am not mistaken and would be a good starting place for me. Any help is appreciated. I have checked 3dcontentcentral with no luck. Also google hasn't come up with a match yet.
Edit: After more looking I found what I needed. Thanks. |
27-10-2014 13:35
Oblarg|
Where did you find them?
I wind up making a generic gray-colored cylinder with rounded edges for my models. |
27-10-2014 13:51
Electronica1|
Where did you find them?
I wind up making a generic gray-colored cylinder with rounded edges for my models. |