|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Whipped this chassis up trying to keep time and machine time in mind. This is the result. With material on hand, this chassis could easily be made before week 1 is over.
27-10-2014 00:06
Lil' Lavery
Love the simplicity. Elegant in that execution.
How are you attaching the bumpers? Have you done any structural analysis on those supporting members behind the bumpers? Or do you even particularly care if they deform?
27-10-2014 01:17
Cash4587|
Love the simplicity. Elegant in that execution.
How are you attaching the bumpers? Have you done any structural analysis on those supporting members behind the bumpers? Or do you even particularly care if they deform? |
27-10-2014 01:38
OblargDo you have enough space to pull those wheels without removing the outer hex frame if you need to do maintenance?
I'm not quite so sure I'd be comfortable with that little substance behind the bumpers on the side. I've seen some crazy deformations of fairly significant framing members through an FRC bumper (I've got a piece of last year's AM14U chassis sitting right next to me that fits the bill). The frame rules are there for a reason - if you take a hefty impact at the least-supported part of your bumper, are you certain it won't fail?
Cool solution for getting the motors out of the way. You lose the benefit of a direct-driven center wheel in the case of chain/belt failure, but that's probably a worthy tradeoff.
27-10-2014 02:10
Cash4587|
Do you have enough space to pull those wheels without removing the outer hex frame if you need to do maintenance?
I'm not quite so sure I'd be comfortable with that little substance behind the bumpers on the side. I've seen some crazy deformations of fairly significant framing members through an FRC bumper (I've got a piece of last year's AM14U chassis sitting right next to me that fits the bill). The frame rules are there for a reason - if you take a hefty impact at the least-supported part of your bumper, are you certain it won't fail? Cool solution for getting the motors out of the way. You lose the benefit of a direct-driven center wheel in the case of chain/belt failure, but that's probably a worthy tradeoff. |
27-10-2014 02:12
Oblarg|
There is plenty of room in a sense to where in order to get the wheel off all you would need to do is remove the axle?
|
27-10-2014 02:24
Cash4587|
In my experience, the center of a robot can get crowded to the point where it's nice to be able to pull the wheels with the axles in place, which is why I asked. Also, you can't pull the axle on the direct-driven wheel without pulling the gearbox.
Just something to think about. |
27-10-2014 02:25
Cash4587http://prntscr.com/506kjk
Here is the DT with added support to the bump outs.
27-10-2014 02:28
Oblarg|
No, you can pull the axles out, like out of the robot, like not into the robot, like out of the frame side, where the wheels are.
|
27-10-2014 02:35
Cash4587|
You can do that, but then they come all the way out of the bearing blocks (and ostensibly any sprockets you have on the other side are then loose, too).
Not saying you should change your design; it's a minor concern. It's just that I've spent a lot of time servicing drives, and little details like this are worth thinking about, if nothing else. Cool, that certainly would be harder to break. |
27-10-2014 02:37
Cash4587One thing I just noticed is that, there is no way to actually run this setup pictured. The gearboxes will need to be on opposite ends of the robot due to the axle length of the gearbox. This is not a problem, just will need to be re-worked.
27-10-2014 09:16
JesseKThis is pretty nifty, but I would worry about the chain runs affecting the match-to-match reliability of 'drive straight' in autonomous.
Eventually the four wheels in the middle will make a trapezoid (or some other such non-square 4-sided shape) rather than a rectangle since the chains will stretch at different rates. This can be mitigated by directly running the chains from the gearbox to both sets of middle wheels. The typical WCD 6WD experiences this with nominal effects since the middle wheel locations are always constant.
| The gearboxes will need to be on opposite ends of the robot due to the axle length of the gearbox. |
27-10-2014 20:10
Lil' Lavery
The wheel service point is one I didn't realize last night, but is an important one. The biggest reason 1712 is looking at using Versachassic/West Coast Drive this upcoming season is wheel wear. We love versawheels, but hate having to spend significant effort in replacing them once the tread wears. Obviously using colsons will mitigate this in your design, but your design also neutralizes one of the best features of having cantilevered drive axles.
31-10-2014 19:01
Madison
Presumably, the power transmission between wheels is hidden inside the tubing?
I'm having trouble wrapping my head around how that all gets assembled -- it seems possible but not pleasant -- and it seems like it'd be a tremendous amount of work to repair a problem with those components after assembly. You'd have to take apart the entire frame.
Edit: It's also plausible that they're just not modeled since, after looking closer, there are no axles in any of the wheels.