|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Here is the concept for our new drive train. We are taking small steps to improve our performance. We are switching to a WCD style but keeping some of the things we are familiar with and already have in stock. Our normal has always been dual 6" Omni's in the front we are keeping those but adding a drop centered wheel. We are keeping the tough box nanos for now since we have several sets of them. The drive will be chain with one gearbox for the front and center and one for the rear. The renders were created using 3DS Max.
02-12-2014 17:42
SohaibWith the Omni-wheels in the front, I'm not sure if a drop center would help. Drop-center's are used to reduce turning scrub by effectively making your robot into two sets of a 4WD. The Omni's already do this for you in terms of turning scrub. I'd suggest go either or, but not both.
02-12-2014 17:51
Ether
What performance benefit are you expecting by adding a set of drop-center wheels in this configuration?
02-12-2014 17:58
Richard Wallace
3620 ran 6 CIM 6WD with four 4" blue nitrile performance wheels and two 4" dual omnis. No drop. Handled like a dream in five events: two Michigan districts, MSC, CMP, and WMRI. Our drivers are hard on tread (like a good driver should be!) and we went through a couple sets per event. Even had to change omnis once. But no problems with control or reliability.
I am with those who recommend against drop-center in a setup like this.
02-12-2014 23:47
RonnieSI would flip your gear boxes so that you are at least direct driving one wheel then running chain runs off of that. It would be more reliable and less chain. Also agree with everyone else on the drop center topic.
-Ronnie
02-12-2014 23:54
RonnieSI would flip your gear boxes so that you are at least direct driving one wheel then running chain runs off of that. It would be more reliable and less chain. Also agree with everyone else on the drop center topic.
-Ronnie
03-12-2014 01:07
nathannfm|
I would flip your gear boxes so that you are at least direct driving one wheel then running chain runs off of that. It would be more reliable and less chain. Also agree with everyone else on the drop center topic.
-Ronnie |
03-12-2014 14:27
Jrizo|
I would flip your gear boxes so that you are at least direct driving one wheel then running chain runs off of that. It would be more reliable and less chain. Also agree with everyone else on the drop center topic.
-Ronnie |
01-01-2015 17:25
JrizoHere is the actual cad file I work better in 3DS max but I realized that some of the measurement's were off so I redid it in Inventor. I have only done the actual drive train and not the whole frame. The center wheel is driven from the front omni by #35 chain. The performance wheels will have blue nitrile on them.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/n4nnbleo11...b2015.iam?dl=0
01-01-2015 18:05
BBray_T1296Why have you chosen to put the omni wheels up front? I would personally make the omnis at the back (seems like no effort at this point, just declare the other side front) to give whatever manipulator/etc the benefit of more fine control.

perhaps this is moot for more reasonably dimensioned robots
.
01-01-2015 18:35
Jrizo|
Why have you chosen to put the omni wheels up front? I would personally make the omnis at the back (seems like no effort at this point, just declare the other side front) to give whatever manipulator/etc the benefit of more fine control.
![]() perhaps this is moot for more reasonably dimensioned robot . |
01-01-2015 18:36
BBray_T1296|
The dimensions of the original drawing are off the actual dimensions are 32x24. I see your point about switching the front and back, we may just do that if our drivers can get the feel for it .
|