|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is a rendering of our 2014 off season drive system. The cad model and info is here
30-12-2014 16:38
notmattlythgoe
Did you guys make any changes from last season?
30-12-2014 16:42
JDGallagher
30-12-2014 16:56
Electronica1To add on to what John said:
1. When using 4 motors, it is lighter than last years system (It is actually geared so it will still work if we decide to not use the minicims)
2. It is now a single stage reduction rather than using a tough box nano.
3. The modules have gotten smaller because we are using 2 inch colson wheels.
4. The piston is now a 2 inch stroke rather than a 3 inch stroke with the ports rotated. This actually allows our frame dimensions to be much more flexible than last years design.
5. We had issues with last years system with the bolts on the modules backing out (especially at the rumble, where we had one bolt back out enough to prevent us from using the traction wheels after lunch). To fix this, we are switching to retaining rings.
6. The 4 inch mecanum wheel allow us to make the traction wheel even closer to the mecanum wheel, making the chain length even shorter.
7. The modules are now made out of 1/8th sheetmetal instead of 1/4th plate, allowing us to use our sponsors turret punch. This should be faster and more accurate than trying to manufacture it in house.
8. The frame has the battery box built in, in order to be more robust than last years system.
30-12-2014 17:04
wilsonmw04What Alex and John said.
30-12-2014 18:35
AlecMataloniAlthough 1/8" material is pretty hefty, you're missing an opportunity to add essentially "free" stiffness to your frame members by only using L shaped metal pieces instead of "C" shapes.
I would recommend that you add a continuous bottom flange to every piece of sheet you have in this photo.
Also, if you do what I mentioned above, you could certainly use a thinner gauge of metal (like .090"), which would allow you to have less lightening holes. Your turret punch sponsor will thank you.
30-12-2014 18:42
wilsonmw04|
Although 1/8" material is pretty hefty, you're missing an opportunity to add essentially "free" stiffness to your frame members by only using L shaped metal pieces instead of "C" shapes.
I would recommend that you add a continuous bottom flange to every piece of sheet you have in this photo. |
30-12-2014 18:47
AlecMataloni|
With the type of drive we are using, a bit of flex is a good thing. This is the 4th year we have used a frame of this nature without any notiable need for more stiffness.
|
30-12-2014 18:48
Electronica1|
Although 1/8" material is pretty hefty, you're missing an opportunity to add essentially "free" stiffness to your frame members by only using L shaped metal pieces instead of "C" shapes.
I would recommend that you add a continuous bottom flange to every piece of sheet you have in this photo. |
30-12-2014 18:54
AlecMataloni|
Originally it was a C frame that was .09, it was changed later in order to give the frame a bit more ground clearance (the location of the module pivot was determined by geometry, which ended up a bit too low to fit a bend on the bottom of the frame and still have acceptable clearance).
We have found this particular frame style to be more than strong enough for anything we will run into for frc. |
30-12-2014 19:45
wilsonmw04|
You're right. This is the fourth iteration, so you guys have certainly thought this through better than I originally gave you credit for, my apologies.
It looks really slick, and I like it! |
31-12-2014 02:25
asid61Does the extra cim on each of the front wheels provide an advantage over just a 4 cim drive?
31-12-2014 07:38
notmattlythgoe
|
Does the extra cim on each of the front wheels provide an advantage over just a 4 cim drive?
|
31-12-2014 08:56
D.AllredThat's a great looking chassis.
Do you install your mecanum wheels as rendered? It's backwards from a normal set up.
David
31-12-2014 09:03
Electronica1|
That's a great looking chassis.
Do you install your mecanum wheels as rendered? It's backwards from a normal set up. David |
31-12-2014 09:13
notmattlythgoe
Have you seen any issues with dropping the traction wheels instead of the mecanum wheels? You'll see more side loads with the traction wheels.
31-12-2014 09:26
Electronica1|
Have you seen any issues with dropping the traction wheels instead of the mecanum wheels? You'll see more side loads with the traction wheels.
|
31-12-2014 16:02
Darkseer54So, is this drive system an octocanum or a dodecacanum?