|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
05-01-2015 20:52
Joey1939I hope to see the Cheezy Poofs pulling this off with a wooden robot.
05-01-2015 21:44
cmrnpizzo14Would this put the tote up another level because it is simply based off of height, not the number of totes?
05-01-2015 22:08
EricH
|
Would this put the tote up another level because it is simply based off of height, not the number of totes?
|
06-01-2015 10:19
cmrnpizzo14|
Nope, not the tote. 6 tote points.
However, the Recycler up there could potentially be in Level 4. No backstop there, so I can't tell for sure. |
06-01-2015 14:39
RypsnortI feel that this would be very difficult to do with a robot.
06-01-2015 14:52
JesseKThis made me think of an interesting question.
Will tall tote stacks (regardless of orientation) be impacted by high speed robots crossing the white bump? It would be cool to have the Cheesy Poofs, Robonauts or other team which plans to build a field to scale with FRC carpet do some experiments.
06-01-2015 16:09
Kevin Sevcik
|
This made me think of an interesting question.
Will tall tote stacks (regardless of orientation) be impacted by high speed robots crossing the white bump? It would be cool to have the Cheesy Poofs, Robonauts or other team which plans to build a field to scale with FRC carpet do some experiments. |
06-01-2015 21:34
samfruthWe ended up measuring the lowest position of the recycling bin on the top tote and found it to be 50 in. After mathing, this would put it in the fourth zone, therefore optimizing the usage of three totes.
08-01-2015 08:20
DoughBoyYou cant score any points the way he has it set up since the orientation has to be the same as the other totes.
08-01-2015 08:33
ATannahill
|
You cant score any points the way he has it set up since the orientation has to be the same as the other totes.
|