|
|
|
 You have the right to remain silent. Anything you say can AND WILL be held against you (AND YOUR TEAM) in the court of public opinion.
So choose what you do wisely. - Koko Ed [more] |
 |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
By: evanperryg
New: 03-05-2015 12:47
Updated: 03-05-2015 12:47
Views: 1663 times
A graphical representation of Archimedes teams' OPRs versus the average points they actually contributed during qualifications.
-each circle is a team.
-the size of the circle represents their OPR. the bigger the circle, the higher the OPR.
-the color represents the average points they scored in each of their qualification matches. The colors are scaled on a max-min range, not rank. Blue is more points, orange is fewer points.
Discussion
view entire thread
03-05-2015 23:30
SoftwareBug2.0
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
Have you considered a scatter plot?
03-05-2015 23:34
GeeTwo
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
While there is a definite correlation between OPR and performance, as I read this, in order to find the #2 scoring team (top left), you would have had to reach down to about #12 or #15 in OPR.
03-05-2015 23:35
Ether
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
|
Originally Posted by evanperryg
...the average points they actually contributed |
03-05-2015 23:53
Abhishek R
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
The fact that there are only 4 blue circles rather than a full spectrum from red to blue indicates a dropoff in points actually contributed. However, there is a pretty good variety of circle sizes, so it seems like there wasn't a large dropoff in OPR. Would it be possible to get a scatterplot of this for clarity?
04-05-2015 08:03
evanperryg
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
I do have a scatter plot, I'll put it up tonight!
Oh, and the color is based on manual scouting data. It takes into account all aspects of autonomous and teleop scoring, excluding co-op.
04-05-2015 09:31
Bennett548
Re: pic: Archimedes Scouting: OPR vs. Robot Performance
I'm guessing there was a dropoff in points scored because a good robot that can score 3x capped stacks in qualifications will have a high OPR, but in playoff they won't necessarily have 3 cans and 18+ totes to use because they are sharing them with the other high scoring team on their alliance.
Playoff scores were higher on average, but a really good robot's individual contribution doesn't have much room to grow.
Edit: I mis-read the description of the graph, I thought it was circle size=qual OPR, color=playoff average contribution.
view entire thread
Tags
loading ...