|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Just an afternoon CAD project to make a West Coast style drivetrain using the wood construction techniques we learned about this season.
- About 31 lbs including belts, 2/3 of which is the gearbox and motors. The wood frame weighs ~6.5 lbs.
-Simple to assemble; contains only 17 wood parts, compared with more than 40 in our 2015 drivetrain.
-15mm HTD belts on 24t pulleys inside tube; assembled as Joey Milia described here
-WCP SS gearbox and 4x1.5" Colson wheels. Easy to adapt to most other gearboxes and wheels.
It's lightened more aggressively and uses smaller tubes than most of what we've built in the past, but certainly "probably should work". Areas I'm most concerned about are the joint in the belly pan, which could be reinforced with some 1/8" plywood and epoxy, if necessary, and the weight of the gearboxes warping the tubes. That could be fixed by adding a cross-brace between the gearboxes.
Bumper mounts, if necessary, could easily be added by extending the top plates and belly pan out between the wheels and adding a perpendicular plate to brace them.
21-05-2015 11:48
rutzmanI heard at World's that you were limited in the size of the pieces that you could cut by the size of your laser cutter. Can you handle larger pieces now, or is this more of a theoretical design?
21-05-2015 12:33
z_beeblebrox
|
I heard at World's that you were limited in the size of the pieces that you could cut by the size of your laser cutter. Can you handle larger pieces now, or is this more of a theoretical design?
|
21-05-2015 14:20
AdamHeard
I would remove all the diamond pocketing in the mock "rails". It cuts the fiber up so much, and it'd be hard to justify the weight it saves for the decrease in strength for a more traditional FRC game with contact.
21-05-2015 17:48
NecroterraYeah, taking a second look at it, the belly pan definitely wouldn't survive a contact game. I think you could design the gearbox crossbrace to handle that though.
21-05-2015 18:08
z_beeblebrox
|
I would remove all the diamond pocketing in the mock "rails". It cuts the fiber up so much, and it'd be hard to justify the weight it saves for the decrease in strength for a more traditional FRC game with contact.
|
|
Yeah, taking a second look at it, the belly pan definitely wouldn't survive a contact game. I think you could design the gearbox crossbrace to handle that though.
|
21-05-2015 19:03
asid61Very cool. 31lbs with a 6-cim drive is very impressive, too.
23-05-2015 00:18
dtengineering
When you take a thin layer of fiberglass and epoxy it over wood the strength and stiffness goes off the chart... you'd have to figure out a way to fillet the corners a bit to allow the glass to flow smoothly over the edges.
Actually, once you got good at glassing you could replace the plywood with balsa and go for...
Oh, wait. You said this weighs 6.5 lbs? Yeah, I don't think the weight savings will be worth it. Wood is pretty amazing on it's own.
Jason
23-05-2015 11:58
carpedav000I'm new to the idea of wood construction, would it be worth it to replace the front and side panels with polycarbonate?
23-05-2015 12:06
Scott Kozutsky|
I'm new to the idea of wood construction, would it be worth it to replace the front and side panels with polycarbonate?
|
23-05-2015 12:18
carpedav000|
The main advantages of wood (IMO) are that it's dirt cheap and can be laser cut very quickly and easily. Polycarbonate is neither.
|
23-05-2015 12:58
mman1506|
While both are true, I saw that someone was concerned about cutting the fiber up too much. I don't necessarily understand what that is, so I was guessing that is was something to do with structural integrity. Polycarbonate is (IMO) much more suited to take impact than plywood is, hence me asking the question in the first place.
|
23-05-2015 15:03
z_beeblebrox
|
Polycarbonate is (IMO) much more suited to take impact than plywood is, hence me asking the question in the first place.
|
23-05-2015 21:46
carpedav000Then why NOT use it for the front/side panels? I've gotten a lot of the benefits of using plywood, but no answers as to why polycarbonate would or would not be better.
23-05-2015 21:56
EricH
|
Then why NOT use it for the front/side panels? I've gotten a lot of the benefits of using plywood, but no answers as to why polycarbonate would or would not be better.
|
23-05-2015 21:57
MichaelBick
|
Then why NOT use it for the front/side panels? I've gotten a lot of the benefits of using plywood, but no answers as to why polycarbonate would or would not be better.
|
23-05-2015 22:05
mman1506|
In this case, plywood takes impacts at least as well as polycarb, and is faster by far to cut and install.
Here are some more possible reasons: Wood is lighter than polycarb for the same size of piece (though it's quite possible that you might need a thicker piece). Wood is actually stiffer than polycarb--take a sheet of birch ply and a sheet of polycarb, hold at one end, shake. Wood is immune to loctite spidering... and it's a lot easier to drill without cracking if you forgot to CAD the holes for the laser. Note: The above specifically applies to birch plywood, ideally Baltic birch plywood. That being said, there ARE teams that build chassis out of polycarb: 1714 has been very hard to see for many years because their primary building material is polycarb (or is it acrylic? think it's polycarb). But they have to be very creative in terms of material attachment and stiffening. |
23-05-2015 22:12
EricH
|
I think your mixing up polycarbonate (lexan) and acrylic (plexiglass). Polycarb is extremely impact resistant but cannot be cut on a commercial laser cutter. Acrylic is very brittle and can very easily be cut on a laser cutter.
|
23-05-2015 22:24
mman1506|
In what way? I happen to be comparing WOOD and polycarb, thank you very much. The comment about the laser cutter was in a statement about WOOD.
|
|
Originally Posted by EricH
In this case, plywood takes impacts at least as well as polycarb, and is faster by far to cut and install.
|
|
Originally Posted by EricH
it's a lot easier to drill without cracking if you forgot to CAD the holes for the laser.
|
23-05-2015 22:32
EricH
|
It's very difficult to crack both polycarbonate and baltic birch while drilling. Out of the two baltic birch is easier to crack.
|
| Again you can not laser cut polycarb with a commercially available machine. |
23-05-2015 22:36
mman1506|
My understanding was that acrylic is easy to drill, polycarb needs a special drill bit or it'll crack, and birch merely splinters if you make a mistake--not crack.
|
23-05-2015 22:44
EricH
|
As I said earlier you are mixing up polycarbonate and acrylic. Acrylic is difficult to drill, polycarbonate is very easy to drill.
|
23-05-2015 23:11
Sperkowsky
|
Ah. (Makes me wonder why acrylic is found with FRC teams--and their "unskilled" drillers--around, but that's beside the point.)
Now, for the impact resistance: polycarb vs birch. Polycarb deflects, birch absorbs. They're about the same, but I'm going to have to give that to the plywood on strength-to-weight ratio. The main issue with birch ply is that it absorbs by getting dented or, eventually, splintering. (Acrylic never even enters this discussion, as the "standard" test for identifying unknown clear plastic is to clamp firmly and hit with the biggest hammer in the area--if it doesn't break, use the polycarb, otherwise it was acrylic.) |
23-05-2015 23:20
Ether|
Plywood loses to poly on strength to weight. ... 1/16 lexan ... 1/16 plywood.
|
23-05-2015 23:22
Sperkowsky
23-05-2015 23:27
EricH
|
Plywood loses to poly on strength to weight. [...] I stood on a freely Standing peice of 1/16 lexan and it just bent I stepped off bent right back into shape no problem. I can't say the same for a piece of 1/16 plywood.
|
23-05-2015 23:35
NecroterraIn 4 competitions, the only thing we broke on our wood robot was the polycarbonate switch covers. 
Of course they took the brunt of the stress and weren't boxes.
24-05-2015 07:49
Ether|
Yea but in order to get a similar strength you would need much thicker wood which may be heavier then the thinner poly carb
|
24-05-2015 12:01
MichaelBick
|
Plywood loses to poly on strength to weight. Lexan is crazy strong. I stood on a freely Standing peice of 1/16 lexan and it just bent I stepped off bent right back into shape no problem. I can't say the same for a piece of 1/16 plywood.
|
24-05-2015 13:36
TheOtherGuy
For reference, baltic birch plywood is ~0.65 g/cm^3, while polycarbonate is around 1.2g/cm^3 and aluminum is ~2.7.
There are many more factors that determine what material we use than simply density and strength. As Cal mentioned, we use plywood because it is incredibly cheap and easy for our team to work with. If using polycarbonate makes sense for your team and application, go for it.
The cutter also leaves a fairly smooth finish on the sides (structurally, though, the lightening patterns aren't really justified).
27-05-2015 22:19
BertmanDon't limit yourself to plywood. Several years ago we made this:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32054
The frame is red oak, uses standard joinery, weighs in at 7 pounds and has been abused by our team for all that time. It has run into walls, jumped curbs, and carried 200 pound students.
Wood is affordable, works with no special tools, is strong, resilient and smells good.
Spend some time examining it and look up some simple boat building techniques.
27-05-2015 22:50
EricH
|
Don't limit yourself to plywood. Several years ago we made this:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32054 The frame is red oak, uses standard joinery, weighs in at 7 pounds and has been abused by our team for all that time. It has run into walls, jumped curbs, and carried 200 pound students. |
27-05-2015 23:04
philso|
Don't limit yourself to plywood. Several years ago we made this:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/32054 |
28-05-2015 12:50
M. MellottI have a few questions...
- What kind of spacing do you use for the tab/pocket joints?
- What are the cross-shaped cut-outs under each hole (anti-rotation slot for a nut)?
- What type and size fasteners are used?
28-05-2015 13:40
z_beeblebrox
|
I have a few questions...
- What kind of spacing do you use for the tab/pocket joints? - What are the cross-shaped cut-outs under each hole (anti-rotation slot for a nut)? - What type and size fasteners are used? |