|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team 2823 WCD Chain-in-tube chassis. This is out first time making a chassis so any feedback would be helpful.
04-12-2015 14:04
mastachyraAt first glance I thought you used some kind of staple to hold the frame together.
In any case, Looks nice. Good job!
04-12-2015 14:06
Sh1ineNice job for your first attempt! A few minor points to make the system better.
First, if your chains were to break you would need to remove either your front or rear rail to access them. As of now that may not seem like a big deal, but once you have electronics and a superstructure added to your robot it will become increasingly more difficult. Take a look at the chassis on our 2014 robot, we use internal belts, and we leave the tube ends open to have access.

Secondly, have you considered using gusset plates on the top of your rails to connect them instead of the aluminum angle? You could use VEX pro parts, or make your own. You could just match drill them if you do not have access to a mill. I think that a gusset plate and rivets will create a stronger connection than the angle in the corners.
I hope this helps!
04-12-2015 14:06
cbale2000Looks great, not bad for a first time chassis build.
My only question is, why are you using the WCP SS Gearbox in the WCD configuration when you're doing chain-in-tube? Using the standard configuration would save you almost an inch of space on each gearbox (and also reduce gearbox cantilevering due to motor weight).
04-12-2015 14:13
mrwrightOne of the things that I noticed is your belly pan appears to be attached directly to the bottom of your rails. We did this a couple of times and the screws eventually came loose and the belly pan dropped out of the bottom.
I would make sure that you have plenty of support especially around the battery. You could possibly attach some angle brackets (like in your corners) and mount the belly pan to them.
Also, does your cutout for the gearboxes have enough clearance to remove them without dropping the pan out?
04-12-2015 14:21
Sh1ine|
One of the things that I noticed is your belly pan appears to be attached directly to the bottom of your rails. We did this a couple of times and the screws eventually came loose and the belly pan dropped out of the bottom.
I would make sure that you have plenty of support especially around the battery. You could possibly attach some angle brackets (like in your corners) and mount the belly pan to them. Also, does your cutout for the gearboxes have enough clearance to remove them without dropping the pan out? |
04-12-2015 15:26
notmattlythgoe
|
One of the things that I noticed is your belly pan appears to be attached directly to the bottom of your rails. We did this a couple of times and the screws eventually came loose and the belly pan dropped out of the bottom.
I would make sure that you have plenty of support especially around the battery. You could possibly attach some angle brackets (like in your corners) and mount the belly pan to them. Also, does your cutout for the gearboxes have enough clearance to remove them without dropping the pan out? |
04-12-2015 15:49
asid61|
We've been attaching our belly pan directly to the bottom of our rails for a few years now and have never had a problem.
|
04-12-2015 19:30
jkelleyrtp|
Take a look at the chassis on our 2014 robot, we use internal belts, and we leave the tube ends open to have access.
![]() |
04-12-2015 20:31
GeeTwo
|
What does your belt path look like inside the tube? I get that chains have the dual sprocket but I don't know how to do it with belts without doing something really strange.
|
05-12-2015 09:09
Sh1ine|
What does your belt path look like inside the tube? I get that chains have the dual sprocket but I don't know how to do it with belts without doing something really strange.
|
05-12-2015 16:15
BrendanB|
First, if your chains were to break you would need to remove either your front or rear rail to access them. As of now that may not seem like a big deal, but once you have electronics and a superstructure added to your robot it will become increasingly more difficult. Take a look at the chassis on our 2014 robot, we use internal belts, and we leave the tube ends open to have access.
|
05-12-2015 18:21
Torvando|
^
Keeping the ends of your tubes open is a plus. If not, consider attaching the front/back tubes & bellypan with bolts for cleaner access. Rivets can be faster to drill out and replace compared to a bolt/nut but having the variable of aluminum shavings flying around your robot in the middle of a crisis repair isn't worth the few seconds in most cases. 3467 ran a Chain in Tube running our elevator last year (the layout was identical to a 6wd setup like this one) and having the ends open made the single repair/adjustment we made to the chains after assembly not as painful. Someone (*cough* me *cough*) accidentally pulled the center output shaft on the practice robot. |
05-12-2015 18:23
Torvando|
Looks great, not bad for a first time chassis build.
My only question is, why are you using the WCP SS Gearbox in the WCD configuration when you're doing chain-in-tube? Using the standard configuration would save you almost an inch of space on each gearbox (and also reduce gearbox cantilevering due to motor weight). |
05-12-2015 21:35
GeeTwo
|
^
Keeping the ends of your tubes open is a plus. If not, consider attaching the front/back tubes & bellypan with bolts for cleaner access. Rivets can be faster to drill out and replace compared to a bolt/nut but having the variable of aluminum shavings flying around your robot in the middle of a crisis repair isn't worth the few seconds in most cases. 3467 ran a Chain in Tube running our elevator last year (the layout was identical to a 6wd setup like this one) and having the ends open made the single repair/adjustment we made to the chains after assembly not as painful. Someone (*cough* me *cough*) accidentally pulled the center output shaft on the practice robot. |
07-12-2015 12:23
Everett33|
Did you consider rivnuts or other captive nuts? When combined with a cordless screwdriver and the appropriate bit, this could be just as quick to remove and replace as a rivet -- without the shavings and need to keep a big stock of fasteners in the pit.
|
07-12-2015 22:41
asid61|
The problem I see is, where do you install the RivNuts in the tube to where you can still remove and replace the chassis rail internals without running into the RivNuts? If it were a rivet, you just drill out the rivet to remove the tube, which also removes the obstruction in the tube.
|