|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Off-season single speed coaxial swerve chassis design done by former student, current mentor, Nick Coussens.
See forum thread for more information and link to the CAD for this design and CAD for our 2014 and 2015 swerve designs.
08-12-2015 16:17
swaxman12345Is there a hidden electronics pan, or was it just not CADed? The design is certainly interesting.
08-12-2015 17:19
Kevin AinsworthThere is a polycarbonate panel in the center for electronics, though it has not been populated in the CAD model.
08-12-2015 19:11
tickspe15I always love seeing the swerve designs your team comes up with
08-12-2015 19:51
page2067Can you show a closer view of module?
and discuss what metrics you (Nick) are going after?
Love PWNAGE swerves. an also always like the bevel edge bumpers.
08-12-2015 20:10
NWChenWhy did you go with a 775 on the VersaPlanetary for module rotation? What ratios are on it/speeds can this achieve?
08-12-2015 21:28
Ari423Can you post a link to the CAD? I can't find any links in the forum thread. Or at least give more in-depth directions to finding the link if one exists.
08-12-2015 21:40
orangemoore|
Can you post a link to the CAD? I can't find any links in the forum thread. Or at least give more in-depth directions to finding the link if one exists.
|
09-12-2015 14:43
Kevin Ainsworth[quote=page2067;1510664]Can you show a closer view of module?
and discuss what metrics you (Nick) are going after?]
I just posted two more pics for the swerve units themselves, should show up soon.
I think that Nick was going for lighter weight primarily and therefore less custom parts, assembly time, etc.
The two speed design we posted last year and used for 2015 were for games that required precision alignment or heavy defense games.
We found that the single speed unit we used in 2014 didn't have the power to get out of trouble for heavy defense, our main downfall at champs that year.
We thought precision alignment would be helpful last year since our original concept was to work with other teams and cap 3-4 totes and a can onto their 2-3 stacks. The swerves worked flawlessly, not a single issue all season on either the comp or practice bot. Just last month the students disassembled the units from the practice bot, cleaned them, inspected them and no noticeable wear was detected. The students reinstalled them into the practice chassis from 2014 to use as a development platform.
09-12-2015 15:06
Kevin Ainsworth|
Why did you go with a 775 on the VersaPlanetary for module rotation? What ratios are on it/speeds can this achieve?
|
09-12-2015 15:52
pwnageNick|
Originally Posted by swaxman12345
Is there a hidden electronics pan, or was it just not CADed? The design is certainly interesting.
|
|
Originally Posted by NWChen
Why did you go with a 775 on the VersaPlanetary for module rotation? What ratios are on it/speeds can this achieve?
|
09-12-2015 16:03
pwnageNickHere are a couple renders that show things a bit better.


Feel free to ask any questions. Keep in mind that there were/are still things I would want to improve on this design, I just found a stopping point and had some other projects I wanted to hit before the new season begins.
Sorry for the large images.
09-12-2015 16:56
Sh1ineVery nice swerve module, it is nicely packaged. I am really impressed that the motors are stationary in this design. I feel ignorant, but what separates a swerve drive from a coaxial swerve? What size wheel are you using and what are the drive gear ratios? Are all the gears stock? How much does the module weigh?
09-12-2015 17:28
Sh1ineAlso, can you explain how the bearing surface works between the wheel module and the rest of the drive module?
09-12-2015 18:06
z_beeblebrox
|
I am guessing it is because we had Nick setup our Versaplanetary gearbox in Solidworks with "Configurations" and he picked a different configuration.
To discuss configurations a little more. When designing the robot we can insert a Vex Versaplanetary gearbox into Solidworks and change it to any possible configuration. This is a tab that allows you to reconfigure an assembly automatically, once you've spent the time adding in all possible parts. You can hide ,surpress, change items in the assembly so that it "reconfigures" the assembly. We currently can change between single and double stage reduction. We can change between the Bag motor, RS550 and RS775 motors. We can change the output shaft options between the .375" hex, .500" hex, .500" round, and 8mm keyed CIM shaft. We can also change to a dual motor option. This all occurs with a click of a button on the same gearbox assembly. So there is no deleting and reinserting a new custom setup. There is no creating a custom assembly each time we need to insert a VersaPlaentary gearbox into the robot design. We should create a video sometime to show how to do this for the First community. |
09-12-2015 19:22
s_forbesLooking at the other renderings you posted (here and here), I have to complement you on such a spiffy design. You guys sure do a good job of removing excess material.
What is the part number on the large bearing used for the pivoting axis of the module?
09-12-2015 20:49
GeeTwo
|
... I am really impressed that the motors are stationary in this design. I feel ignorant, but what separates a swerve drive from a coaxial swerve? ...
|
09-12-2015 21:23
asid61|
That's the practical point of coaxial - the motor cases are stationary relative to the chassis. Coaxial swerve means that at some point, the steering bearings and the drive axle bearings have the same axis. The far more common configuration is similar to this, where the drive axle goes through the steering bearing.
Also, the wheels look to be 4" diameter, based on a 2.5" diameter CIM. |
10-12-2015 00:03
Chak
|
To discuss configurations a little more. When designing the robot we can insert a Vex Versaplanetary gearbox into Solidworks and change it to any possible configuration. This is a tab that allows you to reconfigure an assembly automatically, once you've spent the time adding in all possible parts. You can hide ,surpress, change items in the assembly so that it "reconfigures" the assembly. We currently can change between single and double stage reduction. We can change between the Bag motor, RS550 and RS775 motors. We can change the output shaft options between the .375" hex, .500" hex, .500" round, and 8mm keyed CIM shaft. We can also change to a dual motor option. This all occurs with a click of a button on the same gearbox assembly. So there is no deleting and reinserting a new custom setup. There is no creating a custom assembly each time we need to insert a VersaPlaentary gearbox into the robot design. We should create a video sometime to show how to do this for the First community.
|
14-12-2015 22:57
Chak
|
To discuss configurations a little more. When designing the robot we can insert a Vex Versaplanetary gearbox into Solidworks and change it to any possible configuration. This is a tab that allows you to reconfigure an assembly automatically, once you've spent the time adding in all possible parts. You can hide ,surpress, change items in the assembly so that it "reconfigures" the assembly. We currently can change between single and double stage reduction. We can change between the Bag motor, RS550 and RS775 motors. We can change the output shaft options between the .375" hex, .500" hex, .500" round, and 8mm keyed CIM shaft. We can also change to a dual motor option. This all occurs with a click of a button on the same gearbox assembly. So there is no deleting and reinserting a new custom setup. There is no creating a custom assembly each time we need to insert a VersaPlaentary gearbox into the robot design. We should create a video sometime to show how to do this for the First community.
|
14-12-2015 23:38
z_beeblebrox
|
After reading this, I just had to try it for myself. Here are my results. It has the new Versaplanetary encoder stage, but I decided not to include the motor choices in my version. It made more sense for me to separate the motors, which are bought separately. I would still want to see how you guys did it, and compare it with my own methods. It'll be interesting to see how the "experts" did it compared to my googled knowledge.
|