|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
In the spirit of testing new designs, team 649 plans to build a hexagonal West Coast Drive over winter break. The design an concept is heavily inspired by 148's X-009 offseason DT and 971's 2014 octagonal drivetrain
It's a chain-in-tube system, something we want to test before buildseason starts, mainly to determine if the lack of maintainance and tensioners are worth the extra effort to assemble the chain beforehand. We are also switching to chain for the first time in team history, previously using exclusively belts for our drivetrains (last year we had some serious issues with belts skipping and stripping. Mostly our fault, but we'd like to have some leeway for us making mistakes).
The drivetrain is designed so that the side rails can handle a 6 wheel or 8 wheel configuration (we left out 148's 10 wheel config) without any additional machining. The render shows each configuration on each side of the drivetrain (we're not going to make an asymmetrical drive, don't worry)
With the assumption that next year's game will be defense heavy, we wanted to test the usefulness of a hexagonal drive to prevent t-bones, and if we can even make the strange bumper shape.
This drivetrain will be used to test code, possible custom gearboxes, drivers's practice, and prototypes when buildseason starts.
The CAD will be uploaded soon for anyone who wants a deeper look. Any input would be greatly appreciated
12-12-2015 16:06
asid61Very neat. I assume the bumpers will form the hexagonal sides? Very clever, and it performs the same function.
What made you opt for screw+washer and eclips to secure the shafts over circlips everywhere?
Is it just me, or are there 4 wheels on the far side and only 3 on the close side?
EDIT: Did you add any extra spacing for the chain? Apparently that's a problem according to these tests.
12-12-2015 16:17
RobotsThatWork|
Very neat. I assume the bumpers will form the hexagonal sides? Very clever, and it performs the same function.
What made you opt for screw+washer and eclips to secure the shafts over circlips everywhere? Is it just me, or are there 4 wheels on the far side and only 3 on the close side? EDIT: Did you add any extra spacing for the chain? Apparently that's a problem according to these tests. |
12-12-2015 16:28
Boe|
Very neat. I assume the bumpers will form the hexagonal sides? Very clever, and it performs the same function.
What made you opt for screw+washer and eclips to secure the shafts over circlips everywhere? Is it just me, or are there 4 wheels on the far side and only 3 on the close side? EDIT: Did you add any extra spacing for the chain? Apparently that's a problem according to these tests. |
12-12-2015 16:55
Scott KozutskyGoing by the 2014 rules (as well as 2010-2013 I believe, don't quote me) the bumper corners need to be supported. Because there are unsupported corners that overhang the wheels this drive base would not pass inspection in 2014.
Cool design otherwise.
12-12-2015 17:00
KohKohPuffsI'm not sure what's going on the bumpers, but we will definitely take that into consideration.
Meanwhile, we have uploaded a .STEP file to grabCAD for anyone who wants to see this drivetrain closeup on their CAD software. Link is found here: https://workbench.grabcad.com/workbe...3ckfPNf6IoZmc9
12-12-2015 17:11
Sohaib|
Going by the 2014 rules (as well as 2010-2013 I believe, don't quote me) the bumper corners need to be supported. Because there are unsupported corners that overhang the wheels this drive base would not pass inspection in 2014.
Cool design otherwise. |
12-12-2015 18:33
jagoldmanI think that is a nice design especially with the option for both 6 and 8 wheel drive. I was wondering why your side bumper supports are oriented horizontally instead of vertically. Additionally, it is pretty easy to cut a hole in the top of your change (where the chain is running) and put in a basic chain or belt tensioner if your end up having that problem. In the past, I have found 3D printer parts with a bolt to be great for tensioning.
12-12-2015 18:44
RobotsThatWork|
I think that is a nice design especially with the option for both 6 and 8 wheel drive. I was wondering why your side bumper supports are oriented horizontally instead of vertically. Additionally, it is pretty easy to cut a hole in the top of your change (where the chain is running) and put in a basic chain or belt tensioner if your end up having that problem. In the past, I have found 3D printer parts with a bolt to be great for tensioning.
|
12-12-2015 21:44
lewislongbottomI believe you will also be able to get a 4wd out of that system too!
13-12-2015 15:26
first_newbieIs this slightly better at turning due to the wheel that is on the outside (wider track width)
13-12-2015 21:33
KohKohPuffs|
Is this slightly better at turning due to the wheel that is on the outside (wider track width)
|
| I believe you will also be able to get a 4wd out of that system too! |
13-12-2015 22:10
first_newbiewhy aren't the two gearboxes parallel?
13-12-2015 22:22
KohKohPuffs
14-12-2015 02:39
jagoldmanThis rendering is demonstrating a 8wd on the far side and a 6wd on the nearside. As a result, the gearboxes are in different places.
16-12-2015 20:14
Abhishek RWow, that's really pretty. The bumper concept is simple and neat.
How are you dealing with the difficulties of adding a drop using the chain-in-tube system? Were you able to add a drop somehow or are the wheels different diameter? If so, how do you think that will impact the 6WD version, considering at all times the wheels touching the ground will be running at a different speed?
(or is that 3x1 tubing and I'm just missing it)
17-12-2015 17:30
RobotsThatWork|
Wow, that's really pretty. The bumper concept is simple and neat.
How are you dealing with the difficulties of adding a drop using the chain-in-tube system? Were you able to add a drop somehow or are the wheels different diameter? If so, how do you think that will impact the 6WD version, considering at all times the wheels touching the ground will be running at a different speed? (or is that 3x1 tubing and I'm just missing it) |
21-12-2015 00:46
jagoldman