|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Team SCREAM has been working on a swerve drive this off-season.
Here is a link to the CAD files: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0BwkVdOFz3p39Q3BrSlprdUxyOTQ/view?usp=sharing
We have really appreciated all of the resources that other teams have shared regarding their designs. We especially want to thank Team 1640 Sab-BOT-age and Team 2067 Apple Pi for your excellent resources.
We welcome any feedback.
17-12-2015 10:55
Ryan Dognaux
I don't have access to the CAD models at work, but great job on tackling swerve in the off-season! I'm sure it was a fun exercise for your students to go through.
Did you guys get a chance to manufacture and assemble it yet? Looking forward to seeing the real deal.
17-12-2015 11:14
mrwrightWe just put it through its first drive test yesterday and it seemed to handle great. Here is a quick video clip of its first run:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jGTmtm8e82Y
We were able to machine all of the parts in our shop. We definitely learned a lot.
I have attached a couple of close ups of the actual modules on the chassis.



17-12-2015 11:27
Breakaway3937Those look great Michael! We found that the longest thing to manufacture are the module tubes that connect the wheel module with the stationary plate. We have used ball bearings, needle bearings, and sleeve bearings in the past. We can complete all the swerve module parts in just a few days, but the lathe gets back logged with those tubes.
How is your bearing system set up in the tube?
Do you find it takes a lot of time to manufacture those?
17-12-2015 11:42
mrwrightThe module tubes definitely took the longest to make and we had to get creative with them. They were also the most fun. We have a HAAS TL-1 Lathe and it was a life saver.
We bored out the ID with a boring bar and press fit bronze thrust bushings into them with an arbor press. We then parted the excess bushings off on the lathe. The thrust axle houses the bearing.
We used our mill to drill out the mounting holes. There are several operations involved but we think we can do it efficiently now if we decide to use swerve for this season.
17-12-2015 11:44
AdamHeard
Looks like you can get rid of the spur reduction stage and do all your reduction w/ the timing belt.
17-12-2015 11:58
mrwrightAdam,
I see that now. We could use a 24t and 60t pulley or an 18t and 48t to achieve the same reduction. We may be able to rearrange the setup which may also reduce our footprint with the mounting plate.
How would you suggest mounting the hex axle directly to the CIM motor? We don't have a keyway broach yet but that may be an option. Thoughts?
17-12-2015 12:09
AdamHeard
|
Adam,
I see that now. We could use a 24t and 60t pulley or an 18t and 48t to achieve the same reduction. We may be able to rearrange the setup which may also reduce our footprint with the mounting plate. How would you suggest mounting the hex axle directly to the CIM motor? We don't have a keyway broach yet but that may be an option. Thoughts? |
17-12-2015 12:19
mrwrightYeah. We have lathes. I was just looking on McMaster to find the broach and bushings. We have never broached key ways before but it doesn't look too difficult.
Any concerns with mounting the .500 in Hex directly to the CIM shaft?
Here is what I think we would need to buy in order to broach correctly:
8mm reamer- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8851a23/=10a37ir
2mm keyway broach- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8805a11/=10a3730
8mm collared bushing- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8804a71/=10a36rr
17-12-2015 12:24
AdamHeard
|
Yeah. We have lathes. I was just looking on McMaster to find the broach and bushings. We have never broached key ways before but it doesn't look too difficult.
Any concerns with mounting the .500 in Hex directly to the CIM shaft? Here is what I think we would need to buy in order to broach correctly: 8mm reamer- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8851a23/=10a37ir 2mm keyway broach- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8805a11/=10a3730 8mm collared bushing- http://www.mcmaster.com/#8804a71/=10a36rr |
17-12-2015 12:28
mrwrightGreat. Thanks! We will try this out.
17-12-2015 12:33
mman1506|
Adam,
I see that now. We could use a 24t and 60t pulley or an 18t and 48t to achieve the same reduction. We may be able to rearrange the setup which may also reduce our footprint with the mounting plate. How would you suggest mounting the hex axle directly to the CIM motor? We don't have a keyway broach yet but that may be an option. Thoughts? |
17-12-2015 12:41
mrwright|
Vex also sells this part http://www.vexrobotics.com/vexpro/ha.../217-3255.html
|
17-12-2015 13:38
Breakaway3937|
Looks correct.
We've pressed 3/8 and 1/2" hex onto CIM shafts as well if you do want to stick with the hex interface. |
17-12-2015 17:06
AlexanderTheOKhmm. if you got rid of the spur gear, the belts wouldnt fit around the versaplanetary.
BUT! what if you add a SECOND CIM. If you place them side by side the reduction could be done with the belts AND it would fit around the steering motor.
The reason i had this idea is because ive seen a nearly identical vex EDR swerve
17-12-2015 19:52
pmangels17|
hmm. if you got rid of the spur gear, the belts wouldnt fit around the versaplanetary.
BUT! what if you add a SECOND CIM. If you place them side by side the reduction could be done with the belts AND it would fit around the steering motor. The reason i had this idea is because ive seen a nearly identical vex EDR swerve |
17-12-2015 20:20
mrwright|
But if you were to change the shape of the module and put the CIM in a different spot (like making it more of a corner module) and arrange the CIM, steering, and wheel shafts in a L configuration, you might be able to make it work. Also it might package better and smaller. Just a thought. This thing is awesome!
|