|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Off-Season Gearbox
22-12-2015 22:16
thatprogrammerSpecs:
|
Reduction Ratio 11:64 High: 54:34 Low: 34:54 Weight: 2.2 LBs High Speed (Adjusted): 20.49 Ft/s Low Speed (Adjusted): 8.12 Ft/s |
22-12-2015 22:41
Ari423I'm assuming that weight doesn't include the CIMs. How much of the output shaft does it include?
22-12-2015 22:44
thatprogrammer|
I'm assuming that weight doesn't include the CIMs. How much of the output shaft does it include?
|
22-12-2015 22:53
Chak
The gearbox looks fine. Are you planning on building it in the 2 weeks of off-season we have left?
Is this intended for a WCD? If so, that output shaft would be far too short. I'm not sure if Vex sells a ballshifter with a longer shaft though.
It looks like you can save quite a bit of weight and material if you move the 4 corner standoffs closer to the center and "round out" the corners. You can even just ditch the 4 corner standoffs and use the screws for the CIMs to hold the gearbox together, like the WCP DS does.
The only problem I have with this gearbox is that the CIMs aren't black
.
The picture looks like a screenshot anyways; do you know how to render CAD? (I'm asking because you said this is your first gearbox). If you don't, say what software you use and I'm sure someone can help you.
22-12-2015 22:55
KohKohPuffsWhy are the speeds high? I understand that maybe for an open field, you want to travel at 20 fps (although I use 16 fps for my gearboxes), but I'm not sure about 8 fps as a low speed. One person pointed out on one of my gearboxes going at that similar low speed that the goal of the low speed is not to go fast, but to win a pushing match.
So is there a way to bring that low speed down to... something like 6 fps? This would mean more torque and less current draw, therefore a longer time that the bot with this gearbox can be in a pushing match.
22-12-2015 23:02
thatprogrammer|
Why are the speeds high? I understand that maybe for an open field, you want to travel at 20 fps (although I use 16 fps for my gearboxes), but I'm not sure about 8 fps as a low speed. One person pointed out on one of my gearboxes going at that similar low speed that the goal of the low speed is not to go fast, but to win a pushing match.
So is there a way to bring that low speed down to... something like 6 fps? This would mean more torque and less current draw, therefore a longer time that the bot with this gearbox can be in a pushing match. |
22-12-2015 23:10
Knufire|
]This not unreasonable as the 40amp breakers can last about 50 seconds with 60 amps of draw.
|
22-12-2015 23:14
thatprogrammer|
Is this intended for a WCD? If so, that output shaft would be far too short. I'm not sure if Vex sells a ballshifter with a longer shaft though.
It looks like you can save quite a bit of weight and material if you move the 4 corner standoffs closer to the center and "round out" the corners. You can even just ditch the 4 corner standoffs and use the screws for the CIMs to hold the gearbox together, like the WCP DS does. |
22-12-2015 23:19
thatprogrammer|
That's at the very high end of the error margin given by the manufacturer, the low end is 4 seconds.
http://files.andymark.com/MX5SpecSheet.pdf |
22-12-2015 23:36
Scott KozutskyThere are a LOT of pockets. You can remove a lot of the supports that connect various things together to make fewer larger pockets. This will make it lighter and easier to machine.
The top corners are sharp and don't really support anything. You may want to look into removing them for aesthetic and weight reasons. I personally like the look that 254, WCP and many others' gearboxes have where the outside round of the plate matches the profile of the CIM. 254 example: http://www.nickeyre.com/images/frc2011-3.jpg
Your radii look quite small, this will force you to use a smaller and therefore slower and less durable cutting tool than you may want.
22-12-2015 23:39
thatprogrammer|
There are a LOT of pockets. You can remove a lot of the supports that connect various things together to make fewer larger pockets. This will make it lighter and easier to machine.
The top corners are sharp and don't really support anything. You may want to look into removing them for aesthetic and weight reasons. I personally like the look that 254, WCP and many others' gearboxes have where the outside round of the plate matches the profile of the CIM. 254 example: http://www.nickeyre.com/images/frc2011-3.jpg Your radii look quite small, this will force you to use a smaller and therefore slower and less durable cutting tool than you may want. |