|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
ABS-114 is a shifting gearbox with a high gear reduction of 5.82:1 and a low gear of 19.78:1; a total spread of 3.4. This results in output speeds of 16.8fps and 4.9fps on a 4" wheel.
Both reductions first undergo a 64:11 reduction from the CIMs. The high gear is linked to the carrier plate for the planetary gearset, which directly drives the output shaft. The low gear goes to the sun gear of the planetary for an additional 3.4:1 (72/30 + 1) reduction.
The PTO is not powered while the gearbox is in drivetrain mode, and vice-versa. This is accomplished by using the differential aspect of a planetary gearset; either the ring gear is locked or the carrier plate is.
Weighs 2.8lbs without CIMs, and occupies a space smaller than a WCP 2-cim shifter. I think it is possible to get it lighter if one machines the planetary gearset out of aluminum, but this requires so much machining as-is I would not try that.
CAD is available here in the ABS-114 folder: https://workbench.grabcad.com/workbench/projects/gcBvYbFAI7TQYHiKMOq7jiSQVQxuTYPyTAXwhy5IZUFIGK#/space/gcvLTQUiZ-c9-szjJsPH3WvpxdeKOB9B1Z2b-tQWAq3gUh
01-01-2016 21:20
cbale2000What is this, I don't even...
I hope you'll consider posting the CAD for this at some point, I'm having a hard time even grasping how this thing works. It certainly looks/sounds impressive though! 
01-01-2016 22:11
GeeTwo
That's a lot going on in a little space; very impressive, especially if it works.
The CAD or at least a few renders from other angles would be helpful to understand it all, but let's see how much I can get it from the one render:
01-01-2016 22:35
Chak
This is incredible... After half an hour of looking at ABS-111 (the latest one I can find online) and googling planetary gear ratios, I think I sort of understand now. Time for questions:
(high gear/PTO) where the carrier plate is linked to the input but the carrier plate is locked?


|
[*]Where is the PTO output located? I understand it's linked to the ring gear, so the most obvious place would be behind the drive shaft, where I thought the shifting cylinder would be located. Doing this would not only move the shifter out of the obvious place, but it would be difficult to pass all the different coaxial shafts through the large gear, so I'm guessing that the annular gear has teeth on both the inside and outside of the annulus, and the PTO is another spur gear that takes off of that. Doing bevels would require a lot of extra work and thrust bearings for no discernible benefit.[*]If I understand this right, the PTO output would have to have the shifter in high speed/low torque (single stage) mode, and the carrier is locked, so the output gear ratio would be (64 / 11) * (72 / 30) = 14.0:1 at the ring gear, possibly higher or lower if the PTO is not directly taken from the ring gear.[/list]
|
01-01-2016 22:49
MunchskullYou know, you only need one CIMcoder. 
01-01-2016 23:32
AdamHeard
|
You know, you only need one CIMcoder.
![]() The new AM Cim moter encoder is thinner than the original CIMcoder however it is twice the costs and you reclaim only ~.25" of shaft. Plus the original CIMcoder is designed for an extremely robust encoder with programmable resolution. Of course I am a little biased towards my own design. |
01-01-2016 23:41
GeeTwo
|
I think the PTO is the front-most gear we can see, and it's connected to the gear on the left, which would mean that the PTO shaft is to the left of the 2nd pancake piston. Looking at the 2 PTO gears it actually look like there is some sort of reverse-reduction there. This is all conjecture though, until we get more renders/CAD.
|
02-01-2016 00:08
Chak
|
???
I only see two gears, the 11-tooth pinion of the near CIM and the 60-tooth gear it engages. The two structures behind the front plate do not look like gears; the spacing between "teeth" is uneven, and the tooth profile doesn't make sense for gears. I also don't see a second pancake piston; are you assuming it's below the CIMs coaxial with the 60-tooth gear? What 2 PTO gears? |
. My revised guess is that the PTO is the piece of metal connected to the ring gear with a 1.875'' bolt circle on it, connected to nothing yet.
02-01-2016 13:25
pribusinLooks very impressive. Please post cad files - thank you.
02-01-2016 15:15
asid61I forgot to update the Partner Space recently it looks like. I just finished, so you can take a look at the CAD here. As a side note, ABS-110 (the PTO shifter with the 3-position cylinder) is 0.7lbs lighter than this and far easier to machine. It's also about as compact. The only disadvantage it has compared to this one is the lower spread; 2.3 versus 3.4.
|
That's a lot going on in a little space; very impressive, especially if it works.
The CAD or at least a few renders from other angles would be helpful to understand it all, but let's see how much I can get it from the one render:
|
|
This is incredible... After half an hour of looking at ABS-111 (the latest one I can find online) and googling planetary gear ratios, I think I sort of understand now. Time for questions:
Edit: can we at least get a render of the internals? |
02-01-2016 17:38
GeeTwo
|
There is no real "PTO shaft"; there is a single shaft. The PTO output is attached to the ring gear, which is possible due to epicyclic (planetary)/differential gearing shenanigans.
|
02-01-2016 18:33
asid61|
I hope I'm misreading this, but I can't figure out how to make sense of this. If the PTO output comes down the same shaft as the wheel drive, what makes the PTO mechanism move in one case but the wheels in the other?
|
02-01-2016 23:32
GeeTwo
|
Whoops, I didn't mean it that way. The PTO output is a 32t #25 sprocket with a versakey. It is bolted to a plate that is bolted to the ring gear. The only interface it has with the main shaft is a bearing it rides on to keep it centered. Basically, the PTO output is a "dead axle" sprocket, not a shaft (which I dislike but is hard to work around).
|
03-01-2016 00:07
asid61|
So that thing that looks in the render like a round disk between the ring gear and the 64-tooth gear is actually a #25 sprocket? This would certainly be convenient in that PTO could be geared up or down by a factor of about 2 through selection of a PTO receptor sprocket.
|
03-01-2016 01:09
GeeTwo
|
The round disk is a hub for the #25 sprocket, which is hidden behind it in the render. The GrabCAD model should clear it up.
You can use pretty much any sprocket with a versakey pattern as long as it's not large enough to hit the standoffs. |
03-01-2016 01:58
aldaeron|
I forgot to update the Partner Space recently it looks like. I just finished, so you can take a look at the CAD here.
|
03-01-2016 03:51
asid61|
I downloaded the ABS 114 folder and it is missing the majority of the SolidWorks files and has no STEP file. Can you do a Pack and Go and flatten?
|
03-01-2016 12:12
aldaeronVery cool design!
What material are the planetary gears? 4000 series steel or 7075 aluminum Would you make your own hob to make these (they don't appear to be COTS)?
Still a super cool design
03-01-2016 14:01
asid61|
Very cool design!
What material are the planetary gears? 4000 series steel or 7075 aluminum Would you make your own hob to make these (they don't appear to be COTS)? Still a super cool design |
03-01-2016 20:39
Aren SiekmeierTook me a bit to figure out how the carrier plate ever gets unlocked, that is neat
Just don't apply power while actuating the PTO cylinder!
It's hard to imagine you're using the CIM encoder to line up the locking notches with the cylinder. Can the rounded end of the locking pin ride up the outer contour to get into the notch? Why not make the locking notch the only groove, so the locking pin rides the OD until it engages? Like the locking plate on 118's arm in 2014: http://s22.postimg.org/3sk056lxt/Scr...3_19_25_33.png
Also, for the locking pins, I wonder if you could use something like mcmaster 84835A22 to reduce friction if you want to actuate the PTO cylinder and slide it in into place. You'd have to turn the gearbox slowly to avoid wrecking the lock after PTO engage and before drive disengage.
03-01-2016 20:51
asid61|
Took me a bit to figure out how the carrier plate ever gets unlocked, that is neat
Just don't apply power while actuating the PTO cylinder!It's hard to imagine you're using the CIM encoder to line up the locking notches with the cylinder. Can the rounded end of the locking pin ride up the outer contour to get into the notch? Why not make the locking notch the only groove, so the locking pin rides the OD until it engages? Like the locking plate on 118's arm in 2014: http://s22.postimg.org/3sk056lxt/Scr...3_19_25_33.png Also, for the locking pins, I wonder if you could use something like mcmaster 84835A22 to reduce friction if you want to actuate the PTO cylinder and slide it in into place. You'd have to turn the gearbox slowly to avoid wrecking the lock after PTO engage and before drive disengage. |
03-01-2016 21:15
Aren Siekmeier
03-01-2016 23:42
asid61|
I'd predict this to be fraught with problems, since the CIM shaft position is not necessarily linked to the position of the carrier plate or of the ring gear. You'd have to track both of these somehow in code based on how many counts you've accumulated in each of the PTO cylinder and shift cylinder states. And then you don't know what counts you're missing when either cylinder is actuating. But maybe that's not an issue if you never actuate the PTO cylinder until the end, and you can keep track of things well enough.
Seems it'd be more reliable if you can put an encoder on the carrier plate/ring gear themselves (a wheel side encoder might be all you need, if zeroed properly), or just have them automatically engage from any position. |
05-04-2016 23:56
Colin SmallWow! Amazing work! Just curious, what do you do to make pocketing/support structure between mounting/bearing holes in CAD? Do you offset entities on the holes and then connect the expanded material through lines?
06-04-2016 01:10
asid61|
Wow! Amazing work! Just curious, what do you do to make pocketing/support structure between mounting/bearing holes in CAD? Do you offset entities on the holes and then connect the expanded material through lines?
|
06-04-2016 01:12
OblargNice touch with the socket output. I did this on one of my gearboxes a while back, it's extremely convenient.
06-04-2016 02:21
asid61|
Nice touch with the socket output. I did this on one of my gearboxes a while back, it's extremely convenient.
|
21-04-2016 21:54
izzHi, I tried to open the CAD file, but it would not on my computer because I use Autodesk Inventor instead of Solidworks. Could you upload step files instead of Solidworks files? If not, does anyone know how to convert the files from Solidworks to Inventor or step? I read online that it was possible to open them in Inventor, but I have tried multiple times and it is not working. Thanks in advance.
21-04-2016 22:11
cad321|
Hi, I tried to open the CAD file, but it would not on my computer because I use Autodesk Inventor instead of Solidworks. Could you upload step files instead of Solidworks files? If not, does anyone know how to convert the files from Solidworks to Inventor or step? I read online that it was possible to open them in Inventor, but I have tried multiple times and it is not working. Thanks in advance.
|
21-04-2016 22:20
asid61|
Hi, I tried to open the CAD file, but it would not on my computer because I use Autodesk Inventor instead of Solidworks. Could you upload step files instead of Solidworks files? If not, does anyone know how to convert the files from Solidworks to Inventor or step? I read online that it was possible to open them in Inventor, but I have tried multiple times and it is not working. Thanks in advance.
|
25-04-2016 22:27
izzThank you! The assembly looks really interesting. Nice work!