|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
Amazing the damage done by crossing a few defenses at week 1 Waterbury district event... LOL. Looks like the Hulk stuck his thumb in a pulled the bearing right out.
Luckily we were able to replace the frame rails on both sides with material twice as thick during our 6 hours out of bag time before our week 3 event at Dartmouth. It held up great at that event and we are on to our 3rd event in Maine next week.
31-03-2016 19:01
JohnFogarty
What thickness tubing is that? What kind of wheels did you use?
31-03-2016 19:26
Jay H 237
Looking at that I'd guess that adding a spacer in there would have helped by not allowing the walls to fold in and tear even with the same thickness aluminum material. Those thin walls were the only thing supporting the axles.
I was at Waterbury both days and some of those robots hit the defenses at high speed and caught air at times. You really don't know at times how well some parts will hold up until you give them the real live test!
31-03-2016 22:55
AndrewMorrisonAt least it wasn't caused by us this time!
01-04-2016 11:54
electroken|
What thickness tubing is that? What kind of wheels did you use?
|
01-04-2016 11:55
electroken
01-04-2016 13:25
JohnFogarty
|
That's 0.062" wall thickness 6061-T6 tubing. The drivetrain is 6WD, 8" pneumatic tires in a WCD (cantilevered) configuration.
It was the ramparts that did us in, with that big shot to one wheel at the start of each crossing. We told our driver to drive it as if he stole it, and he did not disappoint. A spacer within the tube may have bought us time, but failure was inevitable. the other side of the tubing has significant stress cracks. As it was, the thing made it halfway through its 17th match before it failed. The new frame ( 0.125" wall thickness) seems bulletproof so far. We would have started off with that if we'd fully understood the brutality of this game. |
01-04-2016 13:27
PayneTrain|
That's 0.062" wall thickness 6061-T6 tubing. The drivetrain is 6WD, 8" pneumatic tires in a WCD (cantilevered) configuration.
It was the ramparts that did us in, with that big shot to one wheel at the start of each crossing. We told our driver to drive it as if he stole it, and he did not disappoint. A spacer within the tube may have bought us time, but failure was inevitable. the other side of the tubing has significant stress cracks. As it was, the thing made it halfway through its 17th match before it failed. The new frame ( 0.125" wall thickness) seems bulletproof so far. We would have started off with that if we'd fully understood the brutality of this game. |
08-10-2016 19:56
chrisflNow that the season is over, could I ask how well the 1/8" wall tubing held up? Would you need bearing blocks with the 1/8" tubing like with 1/16"?
08-10-2016 21:33
Billfred
|
Now that the season is over, could I ask how well the 1/8" wall tubing held up? Would you need bearing blocks with the 1/8" tubing like with 1/16"?
|
08-10-2016 22:32
JohnFogarty
We've also been doing some playing with our 2016 robot at off-season outreach events quite a bit. I can say with some certainty that 0.125" wall tubing holds up without bearing blocks.
08-10-2016 23:18
Eric Scheuing.125 tubing checking in, we're good with no blocks and no spacers.
09-10-2016 03:23
nathannfmMOE also used 1/8" wall but with press fit rings bridging the gap between the inner and outer bearings, still runs great after 80 matches and a few miles of parade route.
The drive is not something you want to take...lightly... 
09-10-2016 11:49
mott1619 ran an 8WD with 6" pneumatic wheels/tires in a West Coast config with bearings pressed directly into .1" VEX 1"x2" tubing with zero issues. Our machine competed at 2 regionals, Champs, IRI and a handful of "street demo" events (where our students decided to use curbs and parking barriers as makeshift Defenses).
Running spacers inside the tube wouldn't have been an option for us because we run a chain-in-tube set-up.
09-10-2016 12:40
chrisflThank you all for the insights. Our team has been looking into trying a west coast drive this fall and this really helps. What other tips or tricks do you guys have in regards to west coast drive?
09-10-2016 12:58
Billfred
|
Thank you all for the insights. Our team has been looking into trying a west coast drive this fall and this really helps. What other tips or tricks do you guys have in regards to west coast drive?
|
09-10-2016 17:07
Cothron Theiss|
4) Design your drivetrain so you can get the main rail off without too much fuss. Riveting your belly pan every inch or so is too much fuss. (This was our greatest issue once we sorted out the chain; haven't designed a better plan yet.)
|
09-10-2016 17:17
BrendanB|
Do you have any preliminary thoughts on how to design a belly pan such that the main rails can be taken off easily? I think that's a tough balance to find, considering that a belly pan has to be mounted properly to impart torsional strength to the chassis. Do you know of any teams that have worked this out?
|
09-10-2016 17:59
Cothron Theiss
10-10-2016 10:57
Thayer McCollumhttps://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4...Q3RxV Wo2QTVJ
So I'm wondering if more teams do this? ^^ It's hard to tell from the picture but we welded thick wall aluminum tube (can't remember exact thickness) into the rail and then machined the weld flat and used a boring bar to achieve the diameter we wanted for the bearing. I feel like this would have prevented the damage to the rail in the original picture. What are your thoughts? Why don't other teams do this? Is it unnecessary? Do I just have no idea what I'm talking about? I am very curious.
10-10-2016 11:17
Billfred
|
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4...Q3RxV Wo2QTVJ
So I'm wondering if more teams do this? ^^ It's hard to tell from the picture but we welded thick wall aluminum tube (can't remember exact thickness) into the rail and then machined the weld flat and used a boring bar to achieve the diameter we wanted for the bearing. I feel like this would have prevented the damage to the rail in the original picture. What are your thoughts? Why don't other teams do this? Is it unnecessary? Do I just have no idea what I'm talking about? I am very curious. |
10-10-2016 11:49
Chris is me|
https://drive.google.com/open?id=0B4...Q3RxV Wo2QTVJ
So I'm wondering if more teams do this? ^^ It's hard to tell from the picture but we welded thick wall aluminum tube (can't remember exact thickness) into the rail and then machined the weld flat and used a boring bar to achieve the diameter we wanted for the bearing. I feel like this would have prevented the damage to the rail in the original picture. What are your thoughts? Why don't other teams do this? Is it unnecessary? Do I just have no idea what I'm talking about? I am very curious. |
10-10-2016 18:36
Thayer McCollumSo I suppose I should have clarified. I agree that structurally the tube concept is overkill. It adds support the rail doesn't really need. We did this because we felt that just pressing the bearings into the rail would cause them to fall out easily. Is that not the case? Does 1/8" wall easily support bearings without them falling out? Because in my experience that hasn't happened. If someone could tell me how to put the bearings in without them falling out I would be happy to learn. (Because those tubes really sucked to put in...)
10-10-2016 19:45
Billfred
|
So I suppose I should have clarified. I agree that structurally the tube concept is overkill. It adds support the rail doesn't really need. We did this because we felt that just pressing the bearings into the rail would cause them to fall out easily. Is that not the case? Does 1/8" wall easily support bearings without them falling out? Because in my experience that hasn't happened. If someone could tell me how to put the bearings in without them falling out I would be happy to learn. (Because those tubes really sucked to put in...)
|
10-10-2016 22:45
Joe Finkel|
So I suppose I should have clarified. I agree that structurally the tube concept is overkill. It adds support the rail doesn't really need. We did this because we felt that just pressing the bearings into the rail would cause them to fall out easily. Is that not the case? Does 1/8" wall easily support bearings without them falling out? Because in my experience that hasn't happened. If someone could tell me how to put the bearings in without them falling out I would be happy to learn. (Because those tubes really sucked to put in...)
|
10-10-2016 23:04
Chris is me|
So I suppose I should have clarified. I agree that structurally the tube concept is overkill. It adds support the rail doesn't really need. We did this because we felt that just pressing the bearings into the rail would cause them to fall out easily. Is that not the case? Does 1/8" wall easily support bearings without them falling out? Because in my experience that hasn't happened. If someone could tell me how to put the bearings in without them falling out I would be happy to learn. (Because those tubes really sucked to put in...)
|
10-10-2016 23:05
Fusion_Clint
11-10-2016 09:25
Chris is me|
Why are the holes offset from each other? It appears that the inner hole is at least 0.125" further to the left as pictured that the outer hole showing the damage.
|
13-10-2016 10:33
MamaSpoldi|
I can't speak for 230, but 4901 never replaced any of their 1/8" wall tubing through two competitions and demos. The final exam would be next weekend at SCRIW.
|