|
|
|
![]() |
|
|||||||
|
||||||||
This is the first custom chassis I have designed. It is inspired by this robot:
http://www.chiefdelphi.com/media/photos/15197
It uses 4 toughboxes, 4 CIMs, and 4 basketballs.
It is mostly likely useless for competition because of weight/size. It might make a great demo bot though if you mount something on it (t-shirt cannon). The basketballs wouldn't be ripped up by asphalt or cement like omni wheels or mecanums. It also would look really cool when it drives around.
16-04-2016 23:30
BernsternThis looks awesome! We might have to try something like this ourselves
...
Would moving diagonally be an issue though, with the scrub force on the wheels you are using to drive the balls? Omniwheels might be better to use to drive the balls.
16-04-2016 23:34
JohnFogarty
I agree, omni wheels theoretically would be a better wheel to drive the balls with.
17-04-2016 00:00
Chak
It might be simpler and easier to replace the red basketball supports with a ball transfer like this. It could also help with the tiny scrub forces from the bearings.
17-04-2016 00:33
Lil' Lavery
Leaving some room for the motor leads may help. 
17-04-2016 00:41
SoftwareBug2.0
17-04-2016 00:41
pilleya
17-04-2016 10:15
Kevin Sevcik
|
I agree, omni wheels theoretically would be a better wheel to drive the balls with.
|
17-04-2016 11:46
JesseK|
I disagree. The balls should never be moving perpendicular to one of those wheels, which is what an omni would help with. Drive just one wheel and the basketball will spin around the other wheel.
I think the problem would be that your traction is based on how much you're compressing ball, since there's no weight transfer from the robot. Plus compressing the ball is likely to make it pop out of where you're capturing it. I'd suggest moving the wheels up to get more weight transfer, but then you would need omnis, and you'd run out of room for the balls unless you used bigger wheels... |
17-04-2016 11:48
Lireal|
I disagree. The balls should never be moving perpendicular to one of those wheels, which is what an omni would help with. Drive just one wheel and the basketball will spin around the other wheel.
|
17-04-2016 12:28
Lireal|
This is feasible. Don't expect this to be something useful in a FIRST game though. If you build it I will be interested to see if this ends up with the same sorts of issues as the one I built.
|
17-04-2016 12:42
hotwheel326I would only see this useful in a wide open game or flat floored like overdrive or aerial assist. But it is a very cool concept that I would like to see passed around from what other people can do.
17-04-2016 13:52
Maxwell777Reminds me of this guy's rideable ball balancing robot, that sat on top of a bowling ball
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vx-jCQpHRTo
17-04-2016 15:12
SoftwareBug2.0
05-05-2016 08:45
Team3844It looks like each ball is in contact with 2 wheels. that would make every ball turn at the same rpm since they are all tied together which would just make the bot rotate in circles.
05-05-2016 09:00
Roboshant|
It looks like each ball is in contact with 2 wheels. that would make every ball turn at the same rpm since they are all tied together which would just make the bot rotate in circles.
|
05-05-2016 15:01
JeffrafaI dug up a couple photos in my email of the ball drive Eric was talking about, we were both on the team in 2005 when it was developed in the offseason. As Eric mentioned, it shared a lot of conceptual similarities with yours - 4 corner balls in a square frame, driven by 4 motors between each ball. It was also inspired by the 2-ball omni drive that Technocats built in 2003.
These were taken when we first assembled everything, as a first pass fit/function check of the captive ball. The lego tires shown on the rollers are just placeholders, and we later had to switch to a stronger hinge at the pivot point above the springs.



We tried several different balls to get something to work - we wanted something in the 4-5" diameter range. Many balls we tried were not quite round enough or too rough (dimpled pitching machine softballs). What is pictured are actually garden gazing balls. They were cheap and light, but welded together from two halves, so they had a bit of an oblong shape. The springs helped accommodate this. Also to Eric's point about preventing driving the balls out from under the chassis, our outer corner ball transfer unit was placed below centerline of the ball (much like your latest update) to mitigate this.
Some of the biggest functional issues stem from the contact point between the ball and the driving rollers/wheels. To drive, you need friction here to transmit torque to the ball, necessitating a fairly significant normal force on the roller, and a grippy material. When the ball is being driven by the opposite roller, you want the ball to spin freely with low friction about the roller contact point. Finding the right balance here can be tricky.
I do like the use of larger wheels as a single roller contacting two balls. It is simpler (less moving parts) than the belt/roller system we had, and there should be minimal load on the wheel shaft, as the normal forces from the balls on either side are balanced. The layout works pretty well because of your choice of larger, basketball-sized balls.
I'll try and do some more digging. Somewhere I have a low quality video of ours driving down a hallway.
06-05-2016 18:36
BotDesignerThank you everyone for the help! From what you have have told/shown me it looks as though I am moving in the right direction.
If we build this we would absouloutly have to use these balls.
http://www.amazon.com/Light-Basketball-Uses-Bright-Official-Weight/dp/B009JBJ142/ref=pd_sim_200_18?ie=UTF8&dpID=51KSObOw1YL&dpSrc=s ims&preST=_AC_UL160_SR159%2C160_&refRID=1EEZ0MCBGS AE9NRQ5C5D
Now to find a way to power them from the robot battery
.